Jump to content

Koh Tao murder trial rescheduled


Lite Beer

Recommended Posts

Koh Tao murder trial rescheduled
The Nation,

KOH SAMUI: -- Court sets hearing dates from July; Myanmar embassy arranges bail guarantee money for the two suspects

The trial of two Myanmar men accused of murdering a pair of British tourists on Koh Tao will be heard in the second half of next year, after the Koh Samui Court agreed yesterday to postpone the case.

The first hearing has been scheduled on July 8 and will be followed by 11 hearings, one each for five witnesses from both the prosecution and defence, the Koh Samui Court said.

The hearings are scheduled on July 8, 9, 10, 22, 28, then on August 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28 and on September 1, 2, 22, 24, 25, 26, judges said.

A senior Myanmar embassy official said more than Bt2 million had been prepared for bail of the two suspects - Zaw Lin and Wai Phyo.

A defence lawyer had earlier made a request to the court, asking for extra statements from more than 15 Myanmar workers on the tourist island included as defence witnesses. It said they earlier had fears for their lives if they gave statements to the Thai police while in Thailand.

But this request was turned down by the court, on grounds that all existing witnesses were already on the lists, including 60 people on the public prosecutors' list who are local police, forensic police personnel and footage from surveillance cameras, a court source said.

The defendants' parents and some relatives were present at yesterday's hearing. One of them said the defence had crucial evidence and confidence that they would defend the suspects.

Zaw Lin and Wai Phyo, both 21, were arrested in October and "confessed" to the crimes, but later withdrew their statements saying they were tortured.

They were in Koh Samui provincial court to hear opening statements from the prosecution, a court official told DPA.

The defence requested that the case be postponed because they had had inadequate time to prepare. The badly beaten bodies of David Miller, 24, and Hannah Witheridge, 23, were found on a beach on Koh Tao on September 15.

British and Myanmar envoys have raised concerns about the investigation, with London sending a police team as observers. The National Human Rights Commission of Thailand also expressed concern about the alleged forced confessions. Thai police denied the accusations of torture or misconduct.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Koh-Tao-murder-trial-rescheduled-30250774.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2014-12-27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were they given bail, or is a bail hearing separate?

With assurances from the Myanmar Embassy there cant be a reason not to grant it without saying they don't trust the Myanmar Government.

Embassies cannot act as guarantor full stop. If they were to succeed (they wont) all foreign detainees worldwide could cite the case while demanding same. Pie in the sky/non starter. Edited by evadgib
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2) You will not use ThaiVisa.com to post any material which is knowingly or can be reasonably construed as false, inaccurate, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of any law.

You also agree not to post negative comments criticizing the legal proceedings or judgments of any Thai court of law.

11) You will not post slurs, degrading or overly negative comments directed towards Thailand, specific locations, Thai institutions such as the judicial or law enforcement system, Thai culture, Thai people or any other group on the basis of race, nationality, religion, gender or sexual orientation.

Posts in violation of the above have been removed and will continue to be removed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this is an effort to have people watching this circus lose interest.

Maybe that's why they did not state the year in their precise schedule

The hearings are scheduled on July 8, 9, 10, 22, 28, then on August 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 28 and on September 1, 2, 22, 24, 25, 26, judges said.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were they given bail, or is a bail hearing separate?

With assurances from the Myanmar Embassy there cant be a reason not to grant it without saying they don't trust the Myanmar Government.

Embassies cannot act as guarantor full stop. If they were to succeed (they wont) all foreign detainees worldwide could cite the case while demanding same. Pie in the sky/non starter.

I believe that the statement about the 2 million Baht having been prepared was by a spokesman for the Myanmar embassy. It didn't say that the embassy was posting bail or offering sureties did it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this is an effort to have people watching this circus lose interest.

Imagine what would happen if they disappeared. No trial?.... they'd be free and the police wouldn't lose face at trial.... then other than a diplomatic row, things would eventually be forgotten?

Just a cynical thought.coffee1.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A defence lawyer had earlier made a request to the court, asking for extra statements from more than 15 Myanmar workers on the tourist island included as defence witnesses. It said they earlier had fears for their lives if they gave statements to the Thai police while in Thailand.

But this request was turned down by the court, on grounds that all existing witnesses were already on the lists, including 60 people on the public prosecutors' list who are local police, forensic police personnel and footage from surveillance cameras, a court source said.

Can this be true? They were denied because police had enough witness that willing to collaborate with their version and will not allow others to discredit them? And the court allowed this to happen? It just doesn't sound fair. And what is the prospect of more witnesses coming out to give testimony during the trial, will the defense be able to use them?

I wonder sometimes if I can ever rely on the news media to report the news properly.

"I wonder sometimes if I can ever rely on the news media to report the news properly."

It's not the fault of the media if it's about Thai police and Thai courts

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were they given bail, or is a bail hearing separate?

With assurances from the Myanmar Embassy there cant be a reason not to grant it without saying they don't trust the Myanmar Government.

Embassies cannot act as guarantor full stop. If they were to succeed (they wont) all foreign detainees worldwide could cite the case while demanding same. Pie in the sky/non starter.

I believe that the statement about the 2 million Baht having been prepared was by a spokesman for the Myanmar embassy. It didn't say that the embassy was posting bail or offering sureties did it?

See OP or post #21.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this is an effort to have people watching this circus lose interest.

Yeah people like you would think that.......if you had half a brain in your head and didn't spend so much time trolling you would realize It is quite the opposite.

What Thailand are doing via the court is sending a message saying :we are being a fair as we can: and when we prove these 2 are guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt it will shut people like you up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Were they given bail, or is a bail hearing separate?

With assurances from the Myanmar Embassy there cant be a reason not to grant it without saying they don't trust the Myanmar Government.

Embassies cannot act as guarantor full stop. If they were to succeed (they wont) all foreign detainees worldwide could cite the case while demanding same. Pie in the sky/non starter.

Who to believe you or :

Myanmar embassy arranges bail guarantee money for the two suspects

Technically evadgib may be right, I don't know. Shouldn't everyone be afforded bail? Especially when they are only in a suspect status. Some people get bail even after they have been found guilty. Too many examples to post here. And the Myanmar statement doesn't mean that they will use diplomatic means to get bail, but they happen to be one of the guarantor. If the Myanmar govt can not post bail for the two suspects, then they very well can give it to the two parents to do so.

I think evadgib is missing the bigger picture here. The statement such as this couldn't have been made without a very high probability of the two being innocent. And that is yet more ammunition to continue to fight for these individuals rights.

Edited by aimbc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...