Jump to content

Bangkok ranked the poorest of 300 cities for economic performances


webfact

Recommended Posts

Bangkok ranked the poorest of 300 cities for economic performances

23-1-2558-15-34-27-wpcf_728x409.jpg

BANGKOK: -- The Brookings Institution and JP Morgan Chase ranked 300 major cities worldwide for economic performance last year with Bangkok coming at the last of the ranking.

Macau, the Chinese territory known for casino gambling, finished No 1, outperforming the rest of the world’s major cities economically, according to its report on economic performance ranking 2013-2014.

The report said cities in the developing world, especially China, dominated the top of the annual economic rankings of 300 cities worldwide.

But with one exception, it said Bangkok, Thailand, performed poorest of all 300 cities surveyed as its economy was wrecked by political strife.

Kuala Lumpur, Ho Chi Minh City, Jakarta, Singapore, all outperformed Bangkok coming at 19, 23, 34, 61 respectively.

Macau has enjoyed a tourism boom, with gamblers coming to bet at more than 30 casinos, including the Venetian Macau, the world’s largest.

Cities in wealthy, developed countries tended to lag behind.

Though most of the cities surveyed around the world have recovered from the Great Recession, 65 percent of European and 57 percent of North American cities have not, according to the study, which ranks cities by growth in employment and in economic output per person. Some highlights:

Joseph Parilla, a Brookings research analyst who co-wrote the report, said he was surprised by the “incredible differentiation within what are considered monolithic economic blocs.” Latin American cities, for instance, mostly sputtered. But Medellin, Colombia, and Lima, Peru, both broke into the top 50.

Cities in wealthy countries tended to perform poorly. But U.S. and British cities showed improvement. Three U.S. cities — Austin and Houston, Texas, and Raleigh, North Carolina — cracked the top 50. In the United Kingdom, London came in No. 26, Manchester No. 60.

The United States and Britain have begun to pick up economic momentum 5½ years after the recession ended.

“In developed economies like North America and Western Europe, cities like London and Houston are flying high, while others like Rotterdam and Montreal are struggling,” Parilla said.

The report said 27 of the 50 top-performing cities were Chinese. Increasingly, strong growth occurred in the traditionally underdeveloped cities of China’s interior, rather than its booming coastal cities. Land-locked Changsha, for instance, enjoyed economic growth per person of 8.6 percent last year and wound up No. 15 in the overall rankings.

The coastal manufacturing powerhouse of Dongguan, next door to Hong Kong, registered per-capita economic growth of just 5.2 percent (unimpressive by Chinese standards) and finished No. 70. Companies have begun to move inland as the cost of labor and land rises on the Chinese coast. And the Chinese government has invested heavily on infrastructure in the interior.

The 18 cities worldwide that specialized in producing commodities such as oil registered the highest rates of growth in economic output per person (2.6 percent) and employment (1.9 percent).

“The recent rise in oil and gas production in North America partly explains the success of metropolitan areas like Calgary, Denver, Houston, and Tulsa, which are epicenters of the region’s shale revolution,” the report said.

Next year’s rankings may be different. Oil prices have plunged to less than $48 a barrel from $107 a barrel last June, jeopardising the prospects of cities that had been riding the energy boom.

Source: http://englishnews.thaipbs.or.th/bangkok-ranked-poorest-300-cities-economic-performances

thaipbs_logo.jpg
-- Thai PBS 2015-01-23

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the study, which ranks cities by growth in employment and in economic output per person

We assume this is factors the registered population and not the actual... sad.png

But than again 'growth in employment' is a bit meaningless if you have about 0.1% unemployment. blink.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the study, which ranks cities by growth in employment and in economic output per person

We assume this is factors the registered population and not the actual... sad.png

But than again 'growth in employment' is a bit meaningless if you have about 0.1% unemployment. blink.png

It ranks growth in employed people not the rate. No matter whether unemployment is 0.1% or 10%, if there is less people working now than the previous period, then the city is not growing. So it is relevent.

Edited by Time Traveller
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is growth rather than might, so seeing any US, UK or Euro zone cities on it is great news after the global crisis. It means people are being hired again (out performing job loses) and those extra people are making more money per head!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whistling.gif This is an example of poorly defined "statistics".

Precisely what is meant by "economic performance"?

The term is so vague and poorly defined it could mean anything.

For that reason it is meaningless and pointless as an indicator of anything.

As the saying goes; "There are three kinds of lies; Lies, Outright Lies, and Statistics".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whistling.gif This is an example of poorly defined "statistics".

Precisely what is meant by "economic performance"?

The term is so vague and poorly defined it could mean anything.

For that reason it is meaningless and pointless as an indicator of anything.

As the saying goes; "There are three kinds of lies; Lies, Outright Lies, and Statistics".

Vague?....read the report. It's very simple how they calculated it. In fact it can't get more easy to calculate.

Economic performance = growth in GDP per capita + growth in employment (i.e number of people employed)

As such Bangkok came last with a -0.5% change in real GDP per capita and a -1.7% fall in total employed people.

Edited by Time Traveller
Link to comment
Share on other sites

whistling.gif This is an example of poorly defined "statistics".

Precisely what is meant by "economic performance"?

The term is so vague and poorly defined it could mean anything.

For that reason it is meaningless and pointless as an indicator of anything.

As the saying goes; "There are three kinds of lies; Lies, Outright Lies, and Statistics".

wa wa wa waaaa waa wawawa :-)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...