Jump to content

do you believe in Dawin theory


Bomonster

Recommended Posts

Where did Darwin come from?

He came from a gene pool situated on a small group of islands you've never heard of. Basically, he started out as a fish in that pool but managed to crawl out as a turtle then climb a tree as a monkey. The view from up top was so good he declared himself God and got murdered for his sins. Now we give thanks to him by giving awards to stupid people to remind us we are only three steps away from a mud bath.

Remember: fish + turtle + monkey = Darwin/God.

(On a small group of islands you've never heard of, and even if you found the place he ate all the dodos already.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did Darwin come from?

He came from a gene pool situated on a small group of islands you've never heard of. Basically, he started out as a fish in that pool but managed to crawl out as a turtle then climb a tree as a monkey. The view from up top was so good he declared himself God and got murdered for his sins. Now we give thanks to him by giving awards to stupid people to remind us we are only three steps away from a mud bath.

Remember: fish + turtle + monkey = Darwin/God.

(On a small group of islands you've never heard of, and even if you found the place he ate all the dodos already.)

Codswallop. Darwin suffered from sea sickness, so never in creation could he have started out as a fish. You need to revise your theories.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Where did Darwin come from?

He came from a gene pool situated on a small group of islands you've never heard of. Basically, he started out as a fish in that pool but managed to crawl out as a turtle then climb a tree as a monkey. The view from up top was so good he declared himself God and got murdered for his sins. Now we give thanks to him by giving awards to stupid people to remind us we are only three steps away from a mud bath.

Remember: fish + turtle + monkey = Darwin/God.

(On a small group of islands you've never heard of, and even if you found the place he ate all the dodos already.)

Codswallop. Darwin suffered from sea sickness, so never in creation could he have started out as a fish. You need to revise your theories.

He developed the sea sickness from blubbering around as a fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The case is closed. Science has put this debate to bed. Darwin nailed it.

In 2005 scientists studying the human genome have proven the chromosomes are a perfect match with our ancestors, the chimp.

There is no missing link.

The religious just haven't kept up with the scientific literature.

By the way. The latest estimates for potential Earthlike planets in the Milky Way Galaxy is 20 billion planets. They are in the 'sweet spot' that may support life.

There are also over 400 billion galaxies.

So there could be 400,000,000,000 X 20,000,000,000 potential Earthlike planets out there.

Edited by joesanunu
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The case is closed. Science has put this debate to bed. Darwin nailed it.

In 2005 scientists studying the human genome have proven the chromosomes are a perfect match with our ancestors, the chimp.

There is no missing link.

The religious just haven't kept up with the scientific literature.

By the way. The latest estimates for potential Earthlike planets in the Milky Way Galaxy is 20 billion planets. They are in the 'sweet spot' that may support life.

There are also over 400 billion galaxies.

So there could be 400,000,000,000 X 20,000,000,000 potential Earthlike planets out there.

But only one Pattaya.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is not a theory.

it is a fairy tale. when the scientists do not find the right answer they will present you junk like this.

In science, a theory is not a hunch or wild guess. A scientific theory is a significant body of proof.

Since 1859 scientists have been scrutinising Darwins theory. So far, 99.9% agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are 480,000 earth scientists, geologists, archeologists, paleontologist and biologists that belong to the American Academy of Science. These are elite scientists

99.9% are backing Darwins theory.

Only the religious and FOX viewers are at war with reality.

So like 97% of the 'merican public anti-Darwin!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The case is closed. Science has put this debate to bed. Darwin nailed it.

In 2005 scientists studying the human genome have proven the chromosomes are a perfect match with our ancestors, the chimp.

There is no missing link.

The religious just haven't kept up with the scientific literature.

By the way. The latest estimates for potential Earthlike planets in the Milky Way Galaxy is 20 billion planets. They are in the 'sweet spot' that may support life.

There are also over 400 billion galaxies.

So there could be 400,000,000,000 X 20,000,000,000 potential Earthlike planets out there.

Good God!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that saying you "believe" in Darwinism is the correct way to put it. I accept the theory of evolution until something scientifically verifiable can can break the Theory, or replace it.

One possibility is that the Universe as we know it is just a computer simulation from a super-intelligent race of beings. A professor of quantum mechanics and supersting theory has stated that you bring the equations to their conclusion, you get a string of zeroes and ones. But not just any string: it's the checksum string developed in the 1940s and, to the best of my knowledge, still in use in programming computers today. What's even more fascinating is that the checksum can be found in our DNA. A relatively simple article that does a pretty good job of explaining this, with references, is http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread832446/pg1

I don't pretend to understand it, but there's a kind of symmetrical beauty to it all.

edited for bloody typos

Edited by noahvail
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quiet night ?

If you are referring to Darwin, it is rumored that he by-passed Thailand.

Yes, otherwise how would all these bitter old farang who retired here, and do nothing but moan all day, and the farang job-seekers, who aren't qualified to work in their own countries, have survived this long. According to Darwin (apparently now called Dawin) they should have been swept from the gene pool long ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is not a theory.

it is a fairy tale. when the scientists do not find the right answer they will present you junk like this.

evolution of the species...survival of the fittest...a fairy tale ???

I am old enough to have seen it happen even in my lifetime

When I was young antibiotics could kill all the bacterial infections in our bodies....however the fittest bacteria survived and multiplied so that now we are facing incurable infections such as MRSA

The story of creation of Adam and Eve is a fairy tale copied in Genesis during the 7th or 8th century BC from the Epic of Gilgamesh written 2800 to 2500 BC

If you are a believer in one single God of the Creation - as I do - you should accept that this God who could create our ancestors from clay (Bible) or from a drop blood (Quran) could also allow one species of the primates to develop brains that allowed them to become us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...