Clinton: Obama should use trade fight to his advantage

[webfact]

Clinton: Obama should use trade fight to his advantage
By KEN THOMAS

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday that President Barack Obama should use a setback in Congress to seek the best possible trade agreement with 11 other Pacific Rim nations, pointing to the stumbles over the pact as an opportunity to address Democrats' concerns about job protections and wages.

"Let's take the lemons and turn it into lemonade," Clinton told more than 700 supporters at the Iowa State Fairgrounds, addressing the controversial Trans Pacific Partnership trade proposal that has splintered Obama from House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi and rank-and-file Democrats.

Courting Iowa voters, Clinton sought to address Democratic opponents of the trade legislation, including liberals and labor unions, who have said the Obama-backed plan will cost U.S. jobs. The agreement has not been finalized or submitted to Congress.

Clinton sought to distance herself from Obama, urging him to listen to Pelosi and Democrats "to make sure we get the best, strongest deal possible. And if we don't get it, there should be no deal."

"I have held my peace because I thought it was important for the Congress to have a full debate without thrusting presidential politics and candidates into it," Clinton said at a house party in Burlington, Iowa. "But now I think the president and his team could have a chance to drive a harder bargain."

The White House and Republican leaders in Congress now face long odds in reviving the legislation after congressional Democrats helped defeat a job retraining program in a blow to Obama's attempt to secure so-called fast track authority. Without the authority to negotiate trade deals that Congress can approve or reject, but not amend, the president would face difficulty in securing the Asia trade deal after years of work.

Pelosi decided to side with House Democrats and oppose Obama's plan, saying it required "a better deal for America's workers."

Clinton appeared to seek middle ground, saying while some support the deal and others vehemently oppose it, "I kind of fall in the group that says 'what's in it?' And 'let's make it as good as it can be, and then let's make a decision.'" She said Obama had an "amazing opportunity" to negotiate better terms that included worker protections, wages and national security provisions that she said she would seek in a final deal.

Clinton said any deal should include the scuttled program to help retrain workers.

Trade has emerged as an early divider within the Democratic primary. Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who was campaigning in Iowa on Sunday, again called on Clinton to oppose the measure.

"It is a failed trade policy, and I would hope that the secretary joins (Massachusetts Sen.) Elizabeth Warren, and the vast majority of Democrats in the Congress in saying, 'No, we've got to defeat this piece of legislation,'" Sanders said Sunday on CBS' "Face the Nation."

Former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley has also opposed the deal and likened it to the North American Free Trade Agreement signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1993. In a statement that did not mention Hillary Clinton by name, O'Malley said Democratic leaders should "step up and urge Congress not to fast track this bad trade deal. We've seen this movie before with NAFTA — a bad trade deal that devastated communities across the country and cost a million American jobs."

The Obama administration expressed confidence Sunday that Congress will approve the trade provisions. Republican leaders generally support Obama's proposal and have suggested they may try to revive the bill as early as this week. "Republicans delivered," said Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., on "Fox News Sunday." ''The question is, are the Democrats going to do this to their president."

While Clinton has refused to take a position on TPP since announcing her candidacy, she called the pact the "gold standard" of trade agreements while serving as secretary of state. Criticism came quickly on Sunday from Republican National Committee spokesman Michael Short.

"By waffling on a trade deal she helped negotiate and once called a "gold standard," Hillary Clinton continues to show why voters overwhelmingly see her as dishonest and untrustworthy," Short said in a statement.

Clinton was spending most of the weekend in Iowa after formally launching her campaign in New York City, seeking to build an organizational edge in the state that tripped up her first presidential campaign against Obama. Sanders was campaigning across the state and former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb, who is exploring a potential Democratic bid, also was holding events in Iowa on Sunday. O'Malley held a day's events in the state last week.
___

Associated Press writer Catherine Lucey in Burlington, Iowa, contributed to this report.


-- (c) Associated Press 2015-06-15

[Cats4ever]

I, as an Aussie, am deeply sceptical about trade deals. They are not free trade deals; otherwise there would not have to be negotiation, beyond when & where do we sign. The USA/Oz deal has meant little for Australia. I am deeply suspicious of foreign governments or companies being able to sue sovereign governments. Ethics and big business are now divorced. By all means open up trade, but make it free and avoid the secrecy.

[Loptr]

The fact that the text of these agreements is not being released to the general public is enough evidence for me to conclude that they are not in the best interests of the people, but are created for the benefit of big companies, so as to be excluded from the sovereign laws of each participating country... If these treaties are good for the people, then make the content public...The EU suspended voting on their version of the treaty due to pushback from the populace...

[GoodThaiGirl]

in the end its all about us corperate profit..not joe public lets get real..mrs clinton the us version of yingluk

[Ulic]

Free Trade Agreements are a euphemism for trade agreements. Free trade deals are excellent

allowing the strong sectors of a country to prosper and weak areas to wither and die or become

more efficient. The people overall win with lower prices of consumer goods. What passes these

days for free trade (in particular with the US) is how can we access your markets without

restriction while protecting our markets from your goods. Usually, how can we sell you

machinery and technology but protect our farmers and manufactures form things you produce

cheaply. Not every sector of a countries economy will be happy with trade deals, there are

always winners and losers. In the US where lobby groups control politicians, fare trade deals

are difficult. Deals with the US are like deals with Walmart. Be careful what you wish for, you

may get it, but it is not what you thought it was. Give and take.

Edited June 15, 2015 by Ulic