Lite Beer Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Yingluck's total assets drop by Bt4.9 millionThe NationBANGKOK: -- FORMER PM Yingluck Shinawatra's assets dropped by Bt4.9 million a year after leaving office last May, the anti-corruption agency disclosed yesterday.Yingluck's assets total Bt612.3 million, but she owes Bt33 million to her brother, former premier Thaksin. Her total net assets were listed at Bt579.3 million, including cash, bank deposits, investments, land plots, 36 buildings, nine vehicles, jewellery and other luxury items, the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) said.This shows a drop of Bt4.9 million compared to when she stepped down on May 8, 2014.Yingluck was dismissed after the Constitutional Court found that her government's transfer of former National Security Council secretary-general Thawil Pliensri was unlawful. Her assets at present show an increase by Bt38.1 million from when she assumed the post of PM in 2011, according to Thawatchai Sirisathanapan, director of the NACC office on political-sector asset audit.He said the NACC would need to conduct a more in-depth investigation into the rise in her assets.Meanwhile, former deputy PM Plodprasop Suraswadi was the richest among Yingluck's former Cabinet members, with assets worth Bt966.1 million.Former labour minister Chalerm Yoobamrung has assets of Bt169.7 million; former finance minister Kittiratt Na-Ranong has Bt53.2 million; ex-PM's Office minister Santi Prompat Bt15.3 million; former ICT minister Anudit Nakornthap Bt14.8 million; and former deputy agriculture minister Siriwat Kachornprasart Bt46.7 million.The assets of ex-deputy PM Pracha Promnok dropped to Bt75 million from Bt396.6 million after his divorce in February. Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Yinglucks-total-assets-drop-by-Bt4-9-million-30263259.html -- The Nation 2015-06-27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaphod reborn Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Shouldn't money transfers from a fugitive be examined by AMLO? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denim Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 He said the NACC would need to conduct a more in-depth investigation into the rise in her assets. Really, they need to make their minds up on this. They just got through telling us she was richer now we are being told she is poorer. Perhaps tomorrow it will be announced that like the Duke of York she is neither up nor down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halloween Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 (edited) This is based on the asset declaration of a person known to have perjured herself about the same subject. Credibility factor quite low. Also have personal experience of a Thai woman claiming debts to, and repayment of debts from, family members to prevent recovery of monies owed. Edited June 27, 2015 by halloween Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Haggis Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 (edited) This is based on a NACC investigation... Get over yourself !! Do you think the transfer of assets by Prayuth from his father to a company a week old isn't worth of a thorough investigation then? Edited June 27, 2015 by Fat Haggis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaphod reborn Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 This is based on a NACC investigation... Get over yourself !! Do you think the transfer of assets by Prayuth from his father to a company a week old isn't worth of a thorough investigation then? Is Prayuth's father a convicted criminal and fugitive? Poor choice for a comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
worgeordie Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Mushroom futures must have had a big drop,don't feel sorry for her she still has 612 million THB, if I was her I would tell Thaksin if he wants his 33 Million THB back he will have to come to Thailand to collect it. regards worgeordie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robby nz Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 (edited) This is based on a NACC investigation... Get over yourself !! Do you think the transfer of assets by Prayuth from his father to a company a week old isn't worth of a thorough investigation then? It isn't based on an investigation at all it is based on her own declarations of wealth. Try and get over yourself. What it does do is give an indication of what can be seized should she be found guilty by the court on the charges she now faces. Edited June 27, 2015 by Robby nz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapout Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 the british government as well as a middle east lawyer have taken a feww bob out of the shin treasury and it is all same family money what about puggy and family, what have they squirled away during past few years? put the dogs on the entire group of theives/ sic em, run them down and return to the thai people what is rightfully theirs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
little mary sunshine Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Thought I saw Her at Big C having lunch For B25 yesterday. She must be cutting Back on expenses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 This is based on a NACC investigation... Get over yourself !! Do you think the transfer of assets by Prayuth from his father to a company a week old isn't worth of a thorough investigation then? Is Prayuth's father a convicted criminal and fugitive? Poor choice for a comparison. The interesting part of Fatties post is in the "transfer of assets". It does suggest something is amiss. In reality it would seem PM Prayut sold assets which he then transferred to the buyer and divided the sale price amongst his brethern and himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerbalEd Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 So what? 4.9M baht is a mere fluctuation that can easily go up and/or down depending upon the day and the stock market. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerbalEd Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 This is based on the asset declaration of a person known to have perjured herself about the same subject. Credibility factor quite low. Also have personal experience of a Thai woman claiming debts to, and repayment of debts from, family members to prevent recovery of monies owed. You have "personal experience" of a Thai woman lying about money, do you? Aren't you the rare one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fat Haggis Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 This is based on a NACC investigation... Get over yourself !! Do you think the transfer of assets by Prayuth from his father to a company a week old isn't worth of a thorough investigation then? Is Prayuth's father a convicted criminal and fugitive? Poor choice for a comparison. As is your response !! it's about transparency so are you going to answer? Do you think it's all above board that the timing of his coup and the transfers of huge sums of money to a company just a week old is kosher? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolgeoff Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 have not heard the result of the court case but I imagine it will go down further after when she is found guilty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zaphod reborn Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 This is based on a NACC investigation... Get over yourself !! Do you think the transfer of assets by Prayuth from his father to a company a week old isn't worth of a thorough investigation then? Is Prayuth's father a convicted criminal and fugitive? Poor choice for a comparison. As is your response !! it's about transparency so are you going to answer? Do you think it's all above board that the timing of his coup and the transfers of huge sums of money to a company just a week old is kosher? You must not understand money-laundering. Money-laundering is taking ill-gotten assets and transferring them in a manner to make them appear that they were legitimately earned. Thaksin was already convicted of unlawfully profiting from the sale of land. He transferred assets to Yingluck. Shouldn't AMLO take a look at whether the assets transferred to Yingluck were Thaksin's ill-gotten gains? After all, that's what he was convicted of. I'm not aware that Prayuth's profits from the sale of land were in any way illegal. Do you have evidence of that? If not, there's no AMLO violation for transferring the profit to his father. That's why your comparison was misplaced. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrilled Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 I imagine her court case will cost quite A bit more than that.She needs to talk nice to her brother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammygood Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 in this country taking a loan, even you have 500 million, will be seen as a decrease, so why she eventually took a loan ? or she played on the wrong ponies ? or stock did go down ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wabothai Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 did she go shopping yesterday? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 This is based on a NACC investigation... Get over yourself !! Do you think the transfer of assets by Prayuth from his father to a company a week old isn't worth of a thorough investigation then? Is Prayuth's father a convicted criminal and fugitive? Poor choice for a comparison.As is your response !! it's about transparency so are you going to answerDo you think it's all above board that the timing of his coup and the transfers of huge sums of money to a company just a week old is kosher? You must not understand money-laundering. Money-laundering is taking ill-gotten assets and transferring them in a manner to make them appear that they were legitimately earned. Thaksin was already convicted of unlawfully profiting from the sale of land. He transferred assets to Yingluck. Shouldn't AMLO take a look at whether the assets transferred to Yingluck were Thaksin's ill-gotten gains? After all, that's what he was convicted of. I'm not aware that Prayuth's profits from the sale of land were in any way illegal. Do you have evidence of that? If not, there's no AMLO violation for transferring the profit to his father. That's why your comparison was misplaced. Your reasonning is tautological: he's not proven criminal like Thaksin so there is no need to investigate. And as there is no investigation there's no chance to find out if he's eventually criminal. So there will be no investigation, etc.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Is Prayuth's father a convicted criminal and fugitive? Poor choice for a comparison.As is your response !! it's about transparency so are you going to answerDo you think it's all above board that the timing of his coup and the transfers of huge sums of money to a company just a week old is kosher? You must not understand money-laundering. Money-laundering is taking ill-gotten assets and transferring them in a manner to make them appear that they were legitimately earned. Thaksin was already convicted of unlawfully profiting from the sale of land. He transferred assets to Yingluck. Shouldn't AMLO take a look at whether the assets transferred to Yingluck were Thaksin's ill-gotten gains? After all, that's what he was convicted of. I'm not aware that Prayuth's profits from the sale of land were in any way illegal. Do you have evidence of that? If not, there's no AMLO violation for transferring the profit to his father. That's why your comparison was misplaced. Your reasonning is tautological: he's not proven criminal like Thaksin so there is no need to investigate. And as there is no investigation there's no chance to find out if he's eventually criminal. So there will be no investigation, etc.... Agree. It's just that in PM Prayut's case there only seems to be conflicting rumours which are hyped up by opponents. Suggestions that his dad owned 600 million Baht of land because he was in the army (as tbthailand suggested). No one seems to have been able to find additional details. It's like the usual accusations "I accuse, prove me wrong". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mango66 Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 This is based on a NACC investigation... Get over yourself !! Do you think the transfer of assets by Prayuth from his father to a company a week old isn't worth of a thorough investigation then? Is Prayuth's father a convicted criminal and fugitive? Poor choice for a comparison. As is your response !! it's about transparency so are you going to answer? Do you think it's all above board that the timing of his coup and the transfers of huge sums of money to a company just a week old is kosher? You must not understand money-laundering. Money-laundering is taking ill-gotten assets and transferring them in a manner to make them appear that they were legitimately earned. Thaksin was already convicted of unlawfully profiting from the sale of land. He transferred assets to Yingluck. Shouldn't AMLO take a look at whether the assets transferred to Yingluck were Thaksin's ill-gotten gains? After all, that's what he was convicted of. I'm not aware that Prayuth's profits from the sale of land were in any way illegal. Do you have evidence of that? If not, there's no AMLO violation for transferring the profit to his father. That's why your comparison was misplaced. to sell some property and share with relatives is not Corruption of what thak... did !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted June 27, 2015 Share Posted June 27, 2015 Gosh! I forgot the old adage: don't post on week-ends because rubl is fully available! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KamalaRider Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 (edited) He said the NACC would need to conduct a more in-depth investigation into the rise in her assets. Really, they need to make their minds up on this. They just got through telling us she was richer now we are being told she is poorer. Perhaps tomorrow it will be announced that like the Duke of York she is neither up nor down. I Think you need to take more time reading the article. They said she became richer after becoming PM, she lost some 4.9 mill AFTER the junta took over. When in Power as PM, she gained Money. That's what they said. Edited June 28, 2015 by KamalaRider Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spidermike007 Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 Thought I saw Her at Big C having lunch For B25 yesterday. She must be cutting Back on expenses Wonder which one her 9 vehicles she took to the food court? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yunla Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 She should probably have accepted the free food offered by her kind hosts at those foreign state dinners. I bet she's kicking herself now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toybits Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 I am getting dizzy by this up-down motion. In another thread the NACC says here wealth increased! http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/835951-yingluck-becomes-richer-in-latest-wealth-update-by-nacc/ So which is it. Does it really matter and who cares? She is now a civilian. Unless the posts are politically motivated... Now that is another matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sviss Geez Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 He said the NACC would need to conduct a more in-depth investigation into the rise in her assets. Really, they need to make their minds up on this. They just got through telling us she was richer now we are being told she is poorer. Perhaps tomorrow it will be announced that like the Duke of York she is neither up nor down. Really, you need to read the report again and pay particular attention to the dates, there's two of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sviss Geez Posted June 28, 2015 Share Posted June 28, 2015 I am getting dizzy by this up-down motion. In another thread the NACC says here wealth increased! http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/topic/835951-yingluck-becomes-richer-in-latest-wealth-update-by-nacc/ So which is it. Does it really matter and who cares? She is now a civilian. Unless the posts are politically motivated... Now that is another matter. You must be easily dizzied, read the report the figures are explained very clearly... "a drop of Bt4.9 million compared to when she stepped down on May 8, 2014." "Her assets at present show an increase by Bt38.1 million from when she assumed the post of PM in 2011," It's not difficult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now