Jump to content








Questions raised over Prayut's order on LRCT


webfact

Recommended Posts

Questions raised over Prayut's order on LRCT
PRAVIT ROJANAPHRUK
THE NATION

BANGKOK: -- PRIME MINISTER Prayut Chan-o-cha's decision to invoke absolute power under Article 44 and abruptly suspend the selection process of new commissioners for the Law Reform Commission Thailand (LRCT) can either be seen as a move to restructure the agency under the new charter or make it redundant, said Naiyana Supapung.

She is a member of the LRCT panel on gender-equality law reform.

Naiyana said the selection process was nearing completion with 22 candidates having been shortlisted, and the only positive interpretation of Prayut's order is that the role of the commission will be changed under the new charter, so the selection process would no longer be suitable.

She added that the LRCT's existence was necessary, as it offers advice on legislature and reform in a progressive and participatory manner, and played a different role from that of the Council of State.

"If we look at it positively, then they just want [the LRCT] to wait [for the new charter]," Naiyana told The Nation.

However, a negative interpretation would be that there is a lack of understanding of the LRCT's role, which means the organisation's future might be at risk, she said.

Prayut's order on Wednesday includes the removal of all commissioners, whose term expired on May 13 but were still working in caretaker capacity, and to place the LRCT - devoid of new commissioners - under direct supervision of himself as prime minister.

Former LRCT president Kanit na Nakorn said he knew nothing about the motive behind Prayut's order, which was issued in his capacity as leader of the National Council for Peace and Order. Kanit added he had complied with the order and stopped working as caretaker chief of the LRCT as of the end of Wednesday.

When asked what he thought led to this order, Kanit said he did not know.

"There's nothing. You have to ask the secretary-general and the political [decision-maker]," he said, referring to LRCT secretary-general Laddawan Tantivitayapitak.

Laddawan said the move might have stemmed from Prayut's desire to see the commission restructured under the new constitution, which is still being drafted, in order to push for coordinated legal reform.

She admitted that the 22 shortlisted people were not "inspiring", which led to doubts if the new commissioners would be able to serve competently.

Laddawan said the 80-member secretariat, which she leads, would continue working without commissioners. She said she would contact the PM's Office soon for directives, adding that the existence of the LRCT was essential in pushing for progressive law reform.

In a related development, Constitution Drafting Committee (CDC) chairman Borwornsak Uwanno denied that he or other drafters had a role in Prayut's decision on the LRCT.

He added that though one charter drafter was among the 22 shortlisted candidates, nobody had ever raised the topic on whether the commission should be dissolved at any of the CDC meetings. Borwornsak said he might sue the woman, whom he did not identify by name, if she continues accusing him of being behind the order.

Separately, National Legislative Assembly member Somchai Sawangkarn admitted that he knew about the order in advance, claiming that the decision behind the move was to stop the selection process of new commissioners, which was being rigged.

What's the Law Reform Commission of Thailand?

The Law Reform Commission of Thailand (LRCT), consisting of 11 commissioners and a secretariat of some 80 members, was created in 2011 to offer advice and assist all parties with drafting laws.

It offers advice to the Cabinet, the Parliament and citizens, and also educates the public about legal reform in all areas, including people's participation in natural-resource management, labour rights and management, gender equality, women's rights and more.

The 11 commissioners' four-year term expired on May 13.

The LRCT has offered 150 pieces of advice touching on different draft legislation since it was set up.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Questions-raised-over-Prayuts-order-on-LRCT-30264617.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-07-17

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Prayut - O is just warming up , wonder what other absolute power he will over rule or introduce , time Thailand off loaded this egomania, this guy is dangerous.. coffee1.gif

Come into the light.

Everything is going to be alright.

I will take care of all your needs.

Trust the new way.

I am the saviour the truth and the light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like this commission had something useful to provide to the people of Thailand and its law makers.

It would now seem the current government has all the answers and no longer needs this busy-body commission in their way.

All that was good seems to be disappearing little by little, piece by piece.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once you have Power, it's rarely relinquished voluntarily.

He may have started out with noble intentions but they are long gone, similarly is Democracy. Ruling like an Autocrat. Heading down the path of the word beginning with 'C' that we can't use. Commonly referred to when describing Russia and Chinas governments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How on earth can a body like the LRCT become such a "political" hot potato? It's an advisory body, nothing more, nothing less. I, too, was being skeptical about P's motives until I read this paragraph:

"She admitted that the 22 shortlisted people were not "inspiring", which led to doubts if the new commissioners would be able to serve competently."

If there were doubts, why even shortlist them? The people who need the advice of the LRCT, a body whose importance should not be underestimated, include the poor, the disenfranchised, the threatened. It's an agency that appears not to have any political overtones, and the people on it are more altruistic than self-serving. If anything, Prayut should expand its role, making its members directly accessible to the community, and give it powers that skirt around the parliament's oversight and deal directly with the Council of State. That would remove the political element, something we all should approve.

Writer Pravit needs to delve further into this because the LRCT can be a great help to the people. He needs tp press Prayut for some real answers. Don't worry Pravit, you've already been "attitude adjusted". :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" place the LRCT - devoid of new commissioners - under direct supervision of himself as prime minister."

Abuse of power and conflict of interest come to mind but Prayut is above the rule of law.

And when he isn't, he has automatic amnesty.

If there is to be reform of the judicial system, it has to be by people who are accountable to the judicial system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...