Jump to content

New bodies not needed to steer country through crises: CDC


Recommended Posts

Posted

New bodies not needed to steer country through crises: CDC
KASAMAKORN CHANWANPEN
THE NATION

BANGKOK: -- CHARTER drafters believe that the Constitutional Court and other existing agencies are sufficient as "mechanisms to steer the country through crises", their spokesman said yesterday.

In response to a suggestion by the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO) that the new constitution include "mechanisms to break deadlocks during critical times", the Constitution Drafting Commission (CDC) decided that there was no need for new agencies to be set up, spokesman Chartchai na Chiangmai said.

"We haven't really gone into details [about such mechanisms], but there are no special organisations emerging [on the CDC's table] so far. The drafters see that we already have plenty of mechanisms that should be able to do the job [of pulling the country through crises]," Chartchai said.

The CDC was discussing the Constitutional Court's authority and duties.

The Constitutional Court would be authorised as the final adjudicator on any constitutional conflict, including disqualifying political office holders, the CDC spokesman confirmed.

Impeachment cases against political office holders can be taken to court by either members of the public or relevant agencies such as the National Anti-Corruption Commission, Chartchai said.

The charter writers want to ensure that the court can perform its tasks effectively and efficiently, as it played an essential role in protecting the constitution and the rule of law, the spokesman explained. He added that the panel was trying to be prudent in deliberating on the matter.

The CDC also revealed a tentative timeline for the charter-writing process yesterday. By January 8, the first draft of all sections in the charter should be completed, with comments from all the parties involved.

On January 11-17, the CDC is scheduled to finalise the entire draft during a retreat upcountry.

Chartchai said the purpose of the retreat was not to avoid lobbyists, but to enable drafters to focus on their work.

The first draft, according to the timeline, should be made public on January 29, and the "Five Rivers" of power will have until February 15 to submit their responses.

The final draft - after being revised in line with public comments - is set to be completed by March 29.

Chartchai said a national referendum could be held in July next year, but before that the drafters would tell the public how the new charter could help the country move forward.

In a related development, the National Reform Steering Council's subcommittee on political reform has proposed to the CDC that the new charter include a clause to severely punish those who commit electoral fraud.

Those found guilty should not get a suspended sentence, the subcommittee's spokesman Wanchai Sornsiri said. He added that those found guilty in political cases should be banned for life from politics.

On the subject of party-list MPs, Wanchai said there should be only 400 constituency MPs in total.

The panel's chairman Seri Suwanpanon had earlier explained that party lists were often full of "fat cats" who invested in MP seats looking to gain profit.

Chartchai said the drafters had yet to discuss these proposals and would consider them after completing the court section of the draft charter.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/New-bodies-not-needed-to-steer-country-through-cri-30273670.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2015-11-25

Posted

"the Constitutional Court and other existing agencies are sufficient as "mechanisms to steer the country through crises"

That is the right decision by the Committee. But ultimately it will depend on Meechai who represents the NCPO. He has shown himself to rigidly follow the NCPO agenda for the draft constitution and the Five Rivers seem to want mechanisms to weaken political parties and leadership to the extent that coups are no longer necessary to reset elected government behavior.

"The charter writers want to ensure that the court can perform its tasks effectively and efficiently, as it played an essential role in protecting the constitution and the rule of law"

The 2007 Constitution in Part 13, Article 68 "Right to Protect the Constitution," was designed to ensure protection of the constitution. Clearly it failed as the military considers its authority lies outside the people's constitution. That Artilcle was deleted in the draft 2015 Constitution.

Article 68 needs to be reinstated in the 2015 draft but the basic problem lies with the military. Prayut should renounce as an addition to Article 68 the military's perceived authority to act unilaterally in any capacity to control the soveriegnty of the Thai people and agree that it cannot invoke amnesty for its actions, whether it be political or military in nature. Any provision less than such restrictions on the military will cause any constitution to be a sham of the people's exclusive soverneignty.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...