Jump to content
All visa questions and fresh Immigration updates here ×

Koh Tao: Suspects found guilty of murdering British backpackers

Jonathan Fairfield

By Jonathan Fairfield
in Thailand News

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

fayou Apprentice Member

fayou

Posted
Posted (edited)

Statement from Arakan National Party to Prayuth Chan o Cha today Dez 31,2015 (Both accused are Buddhists from Rakhine)post-151207-0-40259900-1451546849_thumb.

Subject: Submission of Request for Reviewing the case of two Myanmar workers.

We Arakan National Party Members of Union Parliament of the Republic of the Union of
Myanmar present our compliments to and have the honor to convey to Your Excellency our deep sense
of disbelief, horror and sorrow at the recent death sentences passed by the Koh Samui court upon our
two young Myanmar workers in Thailand.

As members of parliament upholding international norms. We do respect the Thai Judicial system. However, we honestly believe that the investigation of the case and trial were inconsistent with the facts. The two young Myanmar workers have strenuously denied the charges brought against them. had spoken out very clearly on how they were ill treated, and proclaimed their innocence with strong Evidence

We firmly believe that the dictum ‘Beyond a reasonable doubts’ is the highest standard of proof that must be met in any thrill is overall the benchmark that must be met by the prosecution's evidence in a criminal prosecution that no other logical explanation can be derived from the facts except that the defendants committed the crime thereby overcoming the presumption that a person is innocent until proven guilty.“

Any deviation from the standard would be a terrible and costly miscarriage of justice.
We sincerely believe this standard has not been adhered to. We therefore submit for your wise consideration out of the goodness of your heart for a thorough review of the case with a fair investigation and to arrive at a fair and fair decision.
Allow us to avail ourselves of this opportunity to convey to Your Excellency, the assurances of our High Esteem

Sincerely.

Dr.Ayc Mating
Chairman
Auk-n National Party

Edited by fayou
Link to comment
Share on other sites
StealthEnergiser Silver Member

StealthEnergiser

Posted
Posted

Activist group in Burma Face book page

attachicon.gifnumber9.jpg

I'm glad that the script is too small without enough definition. It saves me from wasting valuable time in attempting to read this (obvious) garbage and I can move onto the next post!!

That's up to you Lucy you can go finish your ironing if like your comments make no difference to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lucky11 Advanced Member

lucky11

Posted
Posted

Activist group in Burma Face book page

attachicon.gifnumber9.jpg

I'm glad that the script is too small without enough definition. It saves me from wasting valuable time in attempting to read this (obvious) garbage and I can move onto the next post!!

That's up to you Lucy you can go finish your ironing if like your comments make no difference to me.

I don't do the ironing I'm afraid - our maid does it!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iReason Gold Member

iReason

Posted
Posted

Another nonsense alert:

(Phoenix Diver, is that you?)

Mon does not own the beach.

No one can.

All of Thailand's beaches, belong to the King.

Mon escorted the police?

I suppose that's one way of putting it.

cheesy.gif clap2.gifcheesy.gif

I've seen Mon escorted by the police as well...

post-206952-0-89671100-1451547277_thumb.

post-206952-0-82561700-1451547301_thumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
daveAustin Ruby Member

daveAustin

Posted
Posted

Mon was photographed inside the crime scene a few hours after the bodies were discovered also on a Thai TV News reprt footage aswell as I remember.

So why the hell was he not a witness for the defence? A member of the public inside a crime scene? Why?

He has to tell why he was inside that police line!

He was inside the crime scene (AGAIN) so he could later be exonerated!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites
smedly Star Member

smedly

Posted
Posted (edited)

Is he the land owner?

I thought he and his family were tennants.

Are the islands not owned by people who can't be spoken of?

Mon wasn't just walking around the crime scene he was rearranging stuff around the murder weapon being a fine example, he was probably handling clothes touching the bodies leaving footprints speading his dna all over the place in front of the police and cameras, then he became a suspect - good luck dna testing anything around there he was all over it

But the hoe is the best of them all, how on earth did he know it was the murder weapon and that it had been moved, it was at least 60m away from the bodies when he finally got the person who moved it to put it back under the tree.......seriously!!!!!!!!!!!

why would he want them to find the hoe ? because it was wiped down and both victims dna was put all over it, the simplistic idea is that Hannah and David killed each other - thought up by a couple of geniuses

Edited by smedly
Link to comment
Share on other sites
StealthEnergiser Silver Member

StealthEnergiser

Posted
Posted

Follow

@daveoli I will quote you a top DNA expert "It is totally incorrect that one can determine race or ethnicity from a forensic DNA profile"

Follow

@daveoli "This is scientifically unsupported in the forensic community world wide.” That is from Jane Taupin. You can check her credentials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Islandlife Senior Member

Islandlife

Posted
Posted

Is he the land owner?

I thought he and his family were tennants.

Are the islands not owned by people who can't be spoken of?

Mon wasn't just walking around the crime scene he was rearranging stuff around the murder weapon being a fine example, he was probably handling clothes touching the bodies leaving footprints speading his dna all over the place in front of the police and cameras, then he became a suspect - good luck dna testing anything around there he was all over it

But the hoe is the best of them all, how on earth did he know it was the murder weapon and that it had been moved, it was at least 60m away from the bodies when he finally got the person who moved it to put it back under the tree.......seriously!!!!!!!!!!!

why would he want them to find the hoe ? because it was wiped down and both victims dna was put all over it, the simplistic idea is that Hannah and David killed each other - thought up by a couple of geniuses

ok,im shure you know better.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AleG Platinum Member

AleG

Posted
Posted

Activist group in Burma Face book page

attachicon.gifnumber9.jpg

Sean McAnna never said what they claim he said, it's a complete falsehood.

The rest is just more the the unsubstantiated rumors, gossip and made up "facts" that constitutes the bread and butter of the narrative that Wei Phyo and Zaw Lin didn't murder Hannah Witheridge and David Miller.

No wonder you all think the Burmese are scapegoats, that seems to be your preferred method for solving crimes, find someone you don't like and then try to frame them for something, just make up a story, any story and run with it; never check the sources, never question the "facts", never corroborate. If it goes against the Burmese being guilty it's all good and welcome.

You are the ones looking for scapegoats, you've always been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DiscoDan Newbie

DiscoDan

Posted
Posted

Say what!!!!!!!!!!!! - are you sure this is authentic DD or is it a spoof?

If it is for real then I wonder what has made him change his stance so dramatically?

Looking forward to see where this is heading!!

Sensational?

Can't say for sure maybe he has been hacked whistling.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
StealthEnergiser Silver Member

StealthEnergiser

Posted
Posted

Say what!!!!!!!!!!!! - are you sure this is authentic DD or is it a spoof?

If it is for real then I wonder what has made him change his stance so dramatically?

Looking forward to see where this is heading!!

Sensational?

Can't say for sure maybe he has been hacked whistling.gif

Can't say for sure but i don't think Anonymous would be finding any of your comments amusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
lucky11 Advanced Member

lucky11

Posted
Posted

Breaking news Jonathan Head now backing verdict

https://mobile.twitter.com/pakhead/status/682102623546118144?p=v

Say what!!!!!!!!!!!! - are you sure this is authentic DD or is it a spoof?

If it is for real then I wonder what has made him change his stance so dramatically?

Looking forward to see where this is heading!!

Sensational?

I've just read it and it is true. Well done Jonathon Head, I salute you for being brave enough to admit that you erred in judgement in such a serious way. I'll forgive you now for your love affair with Yingluck. Now if you changed your tune on this one then you will be a true reporter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MrTee Silver Member

MrTee

Posted
Posted

Activist group in Burma Face book page[/size]

attachicon.gifnumber9.jpg

Sean McAnna never said what they claim he said, it's a complete falsehood.

The rest is just more the the unsubstantiated rumors, gossip and made up "facts" that constitutes the bread and butter of the narrative that Wei Phyo and Zaw Lin didn't murder Hannah Witheridge and David Miller.

No wonder you all think the Burmese are scapegoats, that seems to be your preferred method for solving crimes, find someone you don't like and then try to frame them for something, just make up a story, any story and run with it; never check the sources, never question the "facts", never corroborate. If it goes against the Burmese being guilty it's all good and welcome.

You are the ones looking for scapegoats, you've always been.

There is actually a screenshot of McAnna saying who he believes did it on an FB post..

are you saying its false?

If so how?

forged?

Not McAnna's FB ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MrTee Silver Member

MrTee

Posted
Posted

Breaking news Jonathan Head now backing verdict

https://mobile.twitter.com/pakhead/status/682102623546118144?p=v

Say what!!!!!!!!!!!! - are you sure this is authentic DD or is it a spoof?

If it is for real then I wonder what has made him change his stance so dramatically?

Looking forward to see where this is heading!!

Sensational?

I've just read it and it is true. Well done Jonathon Head, I salute you for being brave enough to admit that you erred in judgement in such a serious way. I'll forgive you now for your love affair with Yingluck. Now if you changed your tune on this one then you will be a true reporter.

Are you chaps really having a circle jerk over an out of context Tweet..

lol - you have just made my day

Link to comment
Share on other sites
StealthEnergiser Silver Member

StealthEnergiser

Posted
Posted

Breaking news Jonathan Head now backing verdict

https://mobile.twitter.com/pakhead/status/682102623546118144?p=v

Say what!!!!!!!!!!!! - are you sure this is authentic DD or is it a spoof?

If it is for real then I wonder what has made him change his stance so dramatically?

Looking forward to see where this is heading!!

Sensational?

I've just read it and it is true. Well done Jonathon Head, I salute you for being brave enough to admit that you erred in judgement in such a serious way. I'll forgive you now for your love affair with Yingluck. Now if you changed your tune on this one then you will be a true reporter.

Your taking it out of context and i suggest you contact him to verify before making misleading headlines.

post-155768-0-07192200-1451549418_thumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AleG Platinum Member

AleG

Posted
Posted

Is he the land owner?

I thought he and his family were tennants.

Are the islands not owned by people who can't be spoken of?

Mon wasn't just walking around the crime scene he was rearranging stuff around the murder weapon being a fine example, he was probably handling clothes touching the bodies leaving footprints speading his dna all over the place in front of the police and cameras, then he became a suspect - good luck dna testing anything around there he was all over it

But the hoe is the best of them all, how on earth did he know it was the murder weapon and that it had been moved, it was at least 60m away from the bodies when he finally got the person who moved it to put it back under the tree.......seriously!!!!!!!!!!!

why would he want them to find the hoe ? because it was wiped down and both victims dna was put all over it, the simplistic idea is that Hannah and David killed each other - thought up by a couple of geniuses

So you haven't thought that since Mon wasn't the first person at the scene, someone that arrived had arrived earlier had noticed the hoe before it was moved, they knew who it belonged to (as people in a small community would) so they knew who to look for to see where it went?

Or is that explanation less likely than the scenario that they carefully staged the crime scene at their business's door to drive suspicions away from them. :rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MrTee Silver Member

MrTee

Posted
Posted

Breaking news Jonathan Head now backing verdict

https://mobile.twitter.com/pakhead/status/682102623546118144?p=v

The joys of taking something out of context and using it as your truth.. Oh Dear.

Out of context!!!

That was the whole tweet in it's entirety!!

Oh you do make me laugh:cheesy:.

yeah, I mean no tweeter ever writes several tweets in a row.

Enjoy..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
iReason Gold Member

iReason

Posted
Posted

Endless talk of the hoe.

If you've seen the grim photos of the wounds on these poor souls, you would know the hoe was at best, an afterthought.

There was plenty of savage, vicious violence before they attempted to distort the initial wounds with the infamous hoe.

And the vested Trolls have come back, feebly attempting to misdirect once again.

This time with tweets.facepalm.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...