rooster59 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Court Warns Against Sharing Videos of Raging JudgeBy Teeranai CharuvastraStaff ReporterJudge Chidchanok Paensuwan is parodied in this t-shirt sold at an online shop. Photo: “We Sell Everything in the Universe” / FacebookBANGKOK — Those sharing videos of a mentally-ill judge going on a rampage may face prosecution, according to a court spokesman.Chidchanok Paensuwan, who was seen yelling and throwing a plastic water bottle at civil servants in a now-viral video, has a mental disorder and is therefore protected by law from public humiliation, spokesman Suebpong Sripongkul said.Suebpong cited Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, which stated that “No person shall disclose information relating to the health of a patient in a manner that may cause damage to them.”“Therefore, those who posted video clips of Ms. Chidchanok with messages that potentially cause damage to her will be considered as breaking the law,” Suebpong was quoted as saying by Spring News yesterday. “They may face both jail terms and fines.” Full story: http://www.khaosodenglish.com/detail.php?newsid=1453523081 -- Khaosod English 2016-01-23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orac Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Surely the ones who disclosed information about her were the courts themselves who told everyone about her mental disorder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thequietman Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phoenixdoglover Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Yet another example of how officials try to intimidate people who are engaging in free speech. There is no disclosure of medical information, other than by the court spokesperson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernard Flint Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Got far more important things in my life, than too look at a deranged guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_smith237 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Yet another example of how officials try to intimidate people who are engaging in free speech. There is no disclosure of medical information, other than by the court spokesperson. OK, so she has a mental disorder, which in the video shows she is not able to control her emotions... But she's allowed to drive ???.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z42 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 And to add to the level of stupidity that has been displayed up to now. The reason the judge was acting so disgracefully was that she reportedly did not take her medication. I guess the only (potential) silver lining here is that her days as a judge are surely over now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riki Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 taking care of one of their own ,how the hell did she become a judge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominique355 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 How about the damage this person may cause to the public? How is the law protecting the public from these people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NongKhaiKid Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 But stable enough to be permitted to drive a car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dominique355 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 This law is very convenient. The government should use it for its own protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reigntax Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Yet another example of how officials try to intimidate people who are engaging in free speech. There is no disclosure of medical information, other than by the court spokesperson. You would expect if they know she has a mental problem, they have a duty of care to all others to ensure she does not pose any danger to anybody else. She obviously is a danger, is being allowed to continue to drive and presnts a danger to all road users and pedestrians, or anyone who crosses her path. The court has once again failed to deal with an issue in a competent and professional manner. They have applied their normal standard of shoot the messenger and ignore the cause, especially as she is one of their muppets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 "Suebpong cited Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, which stated that No person shall disclose information relating to the health of a patient in a manner that may cause damage to them. So you'll be prosecuting yourself soon then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCC1701A Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) so the first thing you say to a thai cop is "i have a mental disorder." so they can't parade you around or photograph you. right? love the tee shirt. Edited January 23, 2016 by NCC1701A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacky54 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Mental dis order is what the hiso always use to get out of prosecution/ or a iight sentence if any, and gives them absurd legal protection from their immature brat like behavior. WIll she pay the fine no, nothing will happen to her including having to have her 'disorder' diagnosed, I diagnose severe Thaialightis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuckBee Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 ^ spot on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MZurf Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 And to add to the level of stupidity that has been displayed up to now. The reason the judge was acting so disgracefully was that she reportedly did not take her medication. I guess the only (potential) silver lining here is that her days as a judge are surely over now "I guess the only (potential) silver lining here is that her days as a judge are surely over now" I wouldn't be so sure about that. Having all your mental faculties in order does not seem to be a prerequisite for obtaining senior public positions in this country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCC1701A Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 "Chidchanok Paensuwan, who was seen yelling and throwing a plastic water bottle at civil servants in a now-viral video, has a mental disorder and is therefore protected by law from public humiliation, spokesman Suebpong Sripongkul said." "Suebpong cited Article 16 of the 2008 Mental Health Act, which stated that “No person shall disclose information relating to the health of a patient in a manner that may cause damage to them.” oops... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaxLee Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Mental dis order is what the hiso always use to get out of prosecution/ or a iight sentence if any, and gives them absurd legal protection from their immature brat like behavior. WIll she pay the fine no, nothing will happen to her including having to have her 'disorder' diagnosed, I diagnose severe Thaialightis Yep that makes everybody in power and their spoilt brats, mentally ill, especially the ones at the top, that must not be named due to forum rules..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCC1701A Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 OMG, I had a TV member disagree with one of my comments! WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE? DON'T YOU KNOW WHO I AM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoboGeisha Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 I didn't know that the average "Do you know who I am?" behavior of many Thai "VIP's" is considered a mental disorder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ceruhe Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 This country produces gold, albeit referring to stories, like no other. Keep it coming, I'm ready for more lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawk Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 I do not believe that she has a certified mental disorder at all, she was clearly having a hi-so tantrum. She is rich so she believes she can do and she pleases. No accuses for such medieval, hi-so bad behaviour. She needs a hard slap around her big head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bridge2bridge Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Another case of the Legal System protecting their own SCUM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phitsanulokjohn Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Mentally ill and driving?Nothing unusual there,I'm up against mental driving all day long here. No,I think it's more a case of the judge being the recipient rather than the administer of the punishment,and found the fact hard to take. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) While she is having these mental health issues, it is pleasing to see that she is still able to hold a drivers licence(or is that an assumption as she is Hi-So) and free to drive about, even if she is few kangaroos short in the top paddock ... Edited January 23, 2016 by Artisi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trogers Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 That video does not show three vital points: 1. She is mentally deranged 2. She is still holding the position of a judge, though inactive 3. She is still allowed to drive a one tonne vehicle on public roads. How can any distributor or viewer construe that she is mentally deranged? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ldiablo Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) I had no idea she had a mental disorder until i was informed by Suebpong. So in essence Mr/Ms Suebpong has in fact disclosed information relating to the health of a patient in a manner that may cause damage to Ms. Paensuwan and has therefore broken the law himself/herself. Edited January 23, 2016 by ldiablo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jacky54 Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 (edited) will she be hearing the cases against those accused of showing her up as a spoilt ill mannered brat? Her husband must be proud, poor sod Edited January 23, 2016 by jacky54 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupatria Posted January 23, 2016 Share Posted January 23, 2016 Chidchanok Paensuwan, who has a mental disorder and is therefore protected by law from public humiliation. If that’s a fact in a civilized country the court would revoke her driving license to protect the rest of the population from her outrage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now