Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

ICC blocks use of 5 witnesses who pulled out of Kenya case

Featured Replies

ICC blocks use of 5 witnesses who pulled out of Kenya case

MIKE CORDER, Associated Press


THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — International Criminal Court appeals judges ruled Friday that statements made by five witnesses who later changed their stories or refused to testify against Kenya's deputy president cannot be used as evidence.

The move is a blow to prosecutors trying Kenyan Deputy President William Ruto on charges of involvement in deadly postelection violence.

Judges last year allowed prosecutors to use the statements as evidence against Ruto and his co-accused Joshua Sang, saying the witnesses effectively pulled out of the case because of intimidation or bribes.

The decision hinged on legal arguments about the court rule used by prosecutors and the trial chamber to admit the statements. Appeals Judge Piotr Hofmanski said the rule was applied "retroactively to the detriment of the accused" and effectively threw out the five witnesses' statements.

Ruto and Sang, who were not in court Friday, have pleaded not guilty to charges of orchestrating violence after Kenya's 2007 presidential elections. Clashes after the flawed vote left more than 1,000 people dead and forced 600,000 from their homes.

Ruto's lawyer, Karim Khan, welcomed the decision but said the prosecution case was fatally flawed even if judges had allowed the statements to remain.

"With these statements or without these statements, there is no case to answer," Khan told The Associated Press. "The case has been brought against the wrong person on the basis of absolutely flawed investigations."

The prosecution office said it "is currently studying" Friday's decision.

Trial judges are also considering a motion by defense lawyers to drop the case for lack of evidence.

Attempts to prosecute the alleged ringleaders of Kenya's postelection violence have been repeatedly hit by allegations of witness interference or a lack of cooperation.

In December 2014, Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda dropped all charges against President Uhuru Kenyatta and accused the Kenyan government of blocking her investigation. Bensouda also has charged three Kenyans with witness interference.

aplogo.jpg
-- (c) Associated Press 2016-01-13

Yes, that's right, the witnesses are threatened, they withdraw there testimony and there

previous sworn testimony is ruled inadmissible. These judges don't understand the facts

of life in a third world country. whistling.gif

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.