Jump to content

Judge inches toward subpoenas in Clinton email server case


webfact

Recommended Posts

Judge inches toward subpoenas in Clinton email server case
By Laura Koran, CNN

Washington (CNN)A federal judge paved the way Tuesday for possible future subpoenas by the State Department against Hillary Clinton and her longtime aide Huma Abedin.

Judge Emmet Sullivan granted a motion in a lawsuit against the State Department Tuesday that could pave the way for future action including, potentially, an order that the State Department subpoena Clinton and top aide Huma Abedin to obtain personal emails they withheld from the State Department.

Full story: http://us.cnn.com/2016/02/23/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-subpoena/index.html

cnn.com.jpg
-- CNN 2016-02-24

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So not only Clinton, but her close aid, a Muslim, had access to and used that server. Both are wanted by the plaintiffs for depositions. Will someone please just throw Hillary in prison?

Thank you.

Well Abedin may be a Muslim but must certainly be 'progressive' in that case as she is married to a Jewish guy - non other than Anthony Weiner the guy who was in the sexting scandal in New York (?) a while back. Why do you label Abedin as a 'Muslim' rather than what she is - close aide to H Clinton? Do you label any of the current Republican candidates as fanatical Christians rather than by name? Are we having an Islamaphobic moment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So not only Clinton, but her close aid, a Muslim, had access to and used that server.

Well, that certainly didn't take long. coffee1.gif

It took a long time for that to become public. Up until now I though that Hillary used a "private" server with classified emails on it, which is a crime. Now I find out that her close aid, a Muslim also had access to and used that server.

What's not to like? Let's tell the whole world our secrets, eh?

Hillary for Prison.

331

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So not only Clinton, but her close aid, a Muslim, had access to and used that server. Both are wanted by the plaintiffs for depositions. Will someone please just throw Hillary in prison?

Thank you.

Well Abedin may be a Muslim but must certainly be 'progressive' in that case as she is married to a Jewish guy - non other than Anthony Weiner the guy who was in the sexting scandal in New York (?) a while back. Why do you label Abedin as a 'Muslim' rather than what she is - close aide to H Clinton? Do you label any of the current Republican candidates as fanatical Christians rather than by name? Are we having an Islamaphobic moment?

In an attempt to enlighten the unenlightened (my Publicus imitation), permit me to provide a few links that you can read and satisfy yourself as to whether Huma has had any affiliations with the Muslim, or extremist Muslim, community during her life and career.

I would only ask you save yourself and any readers some time by not attacking the source, but rather, attack any information you find to be dubious. My sources are, admittedly, conservative in nature.

Surely if it is so dubious as to raise doubts, there are bound to be sources that support any opposing views you might have. Please post them as well.

Thank you for your cooperation.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/354351/huma-unmentionables-andrew-c-mccarthy

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2556

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2557

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2558

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7747

Edited by chuckd
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So not only Clinton, but her close aid, a Muslim, had access to and used that server. Both are wanted by the plaintiffs for depositions. Will someone please just throw Hillary in prison?

Thank you.

Well Abedin may be a Muslim but must certainly be 'progressive' in that case as she is married to a Jewish guy - non other than Anthony Weiner the guy who was in the sexting scandal in New York (?) a while back. Why do you label Abedin as a 'Muslim' rather than what she is - close aide to H Clinton? Do you label any of the current Republican candidates as fanatical Christians rather than by name? Are we having an Islamaphobic moment?

It's her links to the Muslim brotherhood, not just that she is Muslim. Hillary has been enthusiastically cooperating with the OIC in its attempts to create universal blasphemy laws contravention of the first amendment.

I only hope she's given access to Halal food in prison, it's supposed to be better than the standard menu.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/259805/huma-abedin-security-breach-hillary-still-hiding-frontpagemagcom

Edited by Steely Dan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A muslima and a scandalous jew, that makes a nice couple. So the muslima is not a muslima or she would have been slaughter already for going with a jew. The jew is lucky that his kind is not so murderous, but he will probably serve a good cause for the elite. Always handy a circus couple like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely something in the water today.

This will come to nothing unfortunately for the Republicans. This is CNN pandering to get a piece of the Fox News wingnut audience.

This is the only thing the Republicans can hang their hat one. HRC is going to prison. whistling.gif

Before this nonsense, it was the Benghazi nonsense. Tring it back into her MUSLIM assistant is brilliant. If nothing else you gotta admire the creativity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely something in the water today.

This will come to nothing unfortunately for the Republicans. This is CNN pandering to get a piece of the Fox News wingnut audience.

This is the only thing the Republicans can hang their hat one. HRC is going to prison. whistling.gif

Before this nonsense, it was the Benghazi nonsense. Tring it back into her MUSLIM assistant is brilliant. If nothing else you gotta admire the creativity.

So are you saying Benghazi did not happen? or you saying she was not responsible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If only they could save the indictment until after the conventions. What a hoot. A presidential nominee on video repeatedly invoking the 5th Amendment and repeating "I have no recollection of that" thirty times.

Now THAT's entertainment! Has someone under indictment ever run for president before? Would that be another "first" for Hillary? 'Would look good alongside Bill's only-elected-US-president-ever-impeached trophy, eh?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I see in the headline that a judge "inches" towards possibly issuing a subpoena maybe if and only but, I right away picture a snail crawling over a document where ink is drying.

Very cautious double rubber judge there, "inching" towards something as radical and game changing --not-- as a subpoena is or could be maybe if only and sometimes variably.

When I worked for the feds in employment discrimination law I as a non-lawyer (investigator) got a subpoena anytime I thought I needed one just by taking the filled in form to the office director for a little chat. Enforcable in US District Court it is, as this judge well knows. An inch at a time.

Maybe possibly could be perhaps the subpena might be ready for the 2017 editions of Breitbart and Faux among others but only if.

Youse guyz need bigger hats or longer hooks if you're going to find anything here to hang your hat on. All you got at the moment is a Muslim and it just ain't anywhere near enough. Oh, do pardon me, two Muslims.

Edited by Publicus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So not only Clinton, but her close aid, a Muslim, had access to and used that server. Both are wanted by the plaintiffs for depositions. Will someone please just throw Hillary in prison?

Thank you.

A MUSLIM oh my god she must be a TERRORIST!

blink.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely something in the water today.

This will come to nothing unfortunately for the Republicans. This is CNN pandering to get a piece of the Fox News wingnut audience.

This is the only thing the Republicans can hang their hat one. HRC is going to prison. whistling.gif

Before this nonsense, it was the Benghazi nonsense. Tring it back into her MUSLIM assistant is brilliant. If nothing else you gotta admire the creativity.

So are you saying Benghazi did not happen? or you saying she was not responsible?

Actually the Republican party said she wasn't responsible, but, you know, don't let that cloud your thinking.

And the ambassador twice turned down extra security when it was offered, but don't let that change your narrative either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A muslima and a scandalous jew, that makes a nice couple. So the muslima is not a muslima or she would have been slaughter already for going with a jew. The jew is lucky that his kind is not so murderous, but he will probably serve a good cause for the elite. Always handy a circus couple like this.

It's actually quite painful to read rubbish like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A muslima and a scandalous jew, that makes a nice couple. So the muslima is not a muslima or she would have been slaughter already for going with a jew. The jew is lucky that his kind is not so murderous, but he will probably serve a good cause for the elite. Always handy a circus couple like this.

It's actually quite painful to read rubbish like this.

TITV.

Everything goes into the same bin at the end of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump is running for POTUS and Hillary is running from the FBI. coffee1.gif

Not sure true or not, but Fox today was saying 150 FBI agents are working the case and going through every single email sent and received

Far more than investigated 9/11, you could be forgiven for believing that politics is involved................rolleyes.gif Doh!! It is !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A muslima and a scandalous jew, that makes a nice couple. So the muslima is not a muslima or she would have been slaughter already for going with a jew. The jew is lucky that his kind is not so murderous, but he will probably serve a good cause for the elite. Always handy a circus couple like this.

It's actually quite painful to read rubbish like this.

Whatever mom, see you woke up. Print it out and use it in the toilet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A muslima and a scandalous jew, that makes a nice couple. So the muslima is not a muslima or she would have been slaughter already for going with a jew. The jew is lucky that his kind is not so murderous, but he will probably serve a good cause for the elite. Always handy a circus couple like this.

It's actually quite painful to read rubbish like this.

TITV.

Everything goes into the same bin at the end of the day.

1 browny point for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all the hulabaloo about Trump's father and the kkk and Trump's comments about the kkk and other earth shattering news on the election, it has overshadowed the most recent news about Hillary's fight to remain out of jail.

Recent news releases:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

FEBRUARY 29, 2016 6:36 PM
At least 2,079 Clinton emails contain classified material
BY ANITA KUMAR
At least 2,079 emails that Hillary Clinton sent or received contained classified material, according to the State Department’s final update from its review of more than 30,000 emails.
The State Department released a new batch of 3,871 pages of Clinton’s emails Monday evening in response to a court order. Of those, 261 contain classified information. Most were at the confidential level, which is the lowest level of classification. Twenty-three of them were at the Secret level.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
...and...
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Dept. to withhold two new Clinton emails
By SARAH WESTWOOD
2/29/16 3:17 PM
State Department officials will withhold two emails from the batch of Hillary Clinton's private records set for release Monday but none because they contain "top secret" material, spokesman John Kirby said.
The agency will withhold one email between Clinton and President Obama, bringing the total number of undisclosed emails sent back and forth between the two to 19. It will withhold another email at the request of an unspecified law enforcement agency, Kirby said, although he noted the email was not classified.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
...then...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Senior Clinton aide maintained top secret clearance amid email probe, letters show
By Catherine Herridge, Pamela K. Browne
Published February 29, 2016
NOW PLAYING
EXCLUSIVE: A senior Hillary Clinton aide has maintained her top secret security clearance despite sending information now deemed classified to the Clinton Foundation and to then-Secretary of State Clinton's private unsecured email account, according to congressional letters obtained by Fox News.
Current and former intelligence officials say it is standard practice to suspend a clearance pending the outcome of an investigation. Yet in the case of Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s former chief of staff at the State Department, two letters indicate this practice is not being followed -- even as the Clinton email system remains the subject of an FBI investigation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The new releases just keep making that hole deeper and deeper.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Email Undermines Hillary’s ‘Unmarked’ Classified Info Defense
CHUCK ROSS
Reporter
10:26 PM 02/29/2016
A Hillary Clinton email released on Monday shows the former secretary of state questioning whether she had been forwarded classified information in an unmarked email, suggesting that she was well aware that classified information can be classified regardless of if it is “marked” or “unmarked.”
In defending against critics who say she improperly mishandled classified information on her personal email account and private email server, Clinton has said that she did nothing wrong because none of the hundreds of classified emails she sent or received were “marked” as such when they were created.
But an email she sent to two of her aides on April 25, 2012 shows that she was concerned that it contained classified information, even though it had no markings suggesting it was.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...