Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Your the one that's in denial.

Just to inform you, (as you seem unaware) Thaksin is her brother who planted her in the job and then gave out orders from Dubai etc.

DO YOU SEE THE CONNECTION ???----google it OK.

stunning, ginjock returns to the news forum to inform us Thaksin and Yingluck are related.

Well at least there is a basis of fact behind his post - which is unusual enough to raise a comment.

Still no doubt we will soon be revealed as a desperate MINORITY all pursuing an AGENDA...

Terrible when the truth hurts you, as least it is not as ancient as your minority friends favourite----elections---Prayuths non elected etc. amazing denial of why it all happened.----think PTP not conformed to the oath of democratically run government. easy, like it or lump it.

Perhaps I should explain - the factual bit was that Thaksin and Yingluck are related.

As for the rest - well, normal service would appear to have been resumed.

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Posted

You still overlooked the point I made---I was not informing the poster they were related---just reminding him not to forget the facts---OK

try not to mislead with your reply-----twist it anyway you like--but please go back to original post on the topic.......did you conveniently forget what your mate posted ??

Posted

Election Commission will file a civil suit to demand 2.4 billion baht compensation from her over an aborted general election in February 2, 2014.

This suit is paradoxical for a number of reasons.

- The EC as an Independent Organization should shoulder the entire cost of the February election because it failed to carry out its prescribed constitutional responsibility to hold the election within 60 days of the dissolution of Parliament. EC first claimed it wasn't prepared, then claimed a royal decree was required before the date could be set. Yingluck countered that the Constitution already covered the process without a decree. The EC took the issue to the Constitutional Court who ruled in the government's favor, saying only that the date should be agreed to by both the EC and the government.

- In the alternative EC members individually should bear the entire cost of the election.

- EC has no grounds for the suit. The election was not aborted. The election date of February 2, 2014 was agreed to by both the government and EC, after which a royal decree was issued, and the election was held.

- The EC should be suing the PDRC. The election was not aborted. The election was held on February 2, 2014 subsequent to Early Voting a week prior. However, because a number of voting polls were blockaded by the PDRC that prevented 10% of voters from carrying out their constitutional mandate to vote, the EC and the Yingluck government agreed to hold a followup election date later in February to enable those people who were prevented from voting to vote.

Subsequently, those denied voters were able to vote but the Constitutional Court then invalidated 100% of the entire election vote because it claimed there was no provision in the Constitution for an additional voting date. The CC required a completely new election.

- The EC as an Independent Organization should share the cost of the alleged aborted election. It was complicit in setting the election on February 2, 2014 and the followup election date.

After the CC ruled for a new election, the EC continued to stonewall again for an election date within 60 days of the ruling, ie., May 2014 date. The EC seemed to want to defer the election well into summer 2014. Perhaps with the hope there would by some event be no election. Of course in May 2014 the military overthrew the government and abolished the Constitution.

Wait, wait, wait! This is about the rice scheme/scam, wo-ho, hold your horses until a topic is started about the EC and the 'honest, democratic' (LOL) 2014 elections, OK? You're a bit off-topic (though slightly helped by the reported question asked to lil' Poo) with your detailed and slightly(?!) biased post. ...Or were you just attempting to draw a bit of attention away from the family's stinking rice mountain? Business as usual then?

Now we know that you don't read even exceptionally short articles before spouting off... cheesy.gif

From the OP:

Upon arrival, she was asked to comment on a report that the Election Commission will file a civil suit to demand 2.4 billion baht compensation from her over an aborted general election in February 2, 2014.

Fun reading your reaction, which shows you have not read my post's '(though slightly helped by the reported question asked to lil' Poo)', or are the hearings about Ms Yinglucks dereliction of duty and negligence in the rice scheme/scam not the present topic...?

blah blah blah, ...

man up to the fact that you didn't read before attacking posting.

Posted

You still overlooked the point I made---I was not informing the poster they were related---just reminding him not to forget the facts---OK

try not to mislead with your reply-----twist it anyway you like--but please go back to original post on the topic.......did you conveniently forget what your mate posted ??

If by "my mate" you mean LannaGuy, well he said "ahh 'but, but, Thaksin' give it a rest it's pathetic".

​I'm at a loss to understand how I am supposed to be misleading. But never mind, being at a loss when debating/arguing with you is not exactly a new sensation.

"

Posted

And the reply was to Lanna Guy ?? and so on ?? twist it to suit you -----I have read it several times and you are omitting certain items posted to suit....oh well it is usual with your following. Your only debating is elections---anti Prayut, no matter what good is being done or attempting to rectify. In 2 years more is being accomplished that all the years of Yingluck and co.........That is the truth--------and you do not have to be an army follower to see it.

Posted

And the reply was to Lanna Guy ?? and so on ?? twist it to suit you -----I have read it several times and you are omitting certain items posted to suit....oh well it is usual with your following. Your only debating is elections---anti Prayut, no matter what good is being done or attempting to rectify. In 2 years more is being accomplished that all the years of Yingluck and co.........That is the truth--------and you do not have to be an army follower to see it.

Ginjag - how can I break it to you, your post makes no sense, not least because you appear to have edited out all the content in the three posts you quote!

Posted

Jag #36

the system was not allowing me to post unless earlier posts were cut. sorry, the gist of it all was the slagging of an army run government rather than an elected one.

Seemingly Prayuth is on a loser in his bid to clean up a mega mess...............I would suggest the few that persist in their daily ritual get the rewards by having PTP back.

Posted

Jag #36

the system was not allowing me to post unless earlier posts were cut. sorry, the gist of it all was the slagging of an army run government rather than an elected one.

Seemingly Prayuth is on a loser in his bid to clean up a mega mess...............I would suggest the few that persist in their daily ritual get the rewards by having PTP back.

You must realize by now that I "slag off" an army run government because it has taken the place of an elected government. It could ( should) have ensured that an elected government was the result of the 2014 election. Instead it chose to take power itself ( and for itself).

The mess the country is in is a result of that.

This position, which I share with several others (who you consistently refer to as a "minority") is based on a fundamental belief in the importance of electoral democracy, and the right of the people of this ( our adopted) country to enjoy it.

Nothing twisted, nothing spun, and certainly no personal gain.

It's as simple as that. Disagree by all means, but please don't imply dishonesty.

Posted

Jag #36

the system was not allowing me to post unless earlier posts were cut. sorry, the gist of it all was the slagging of an army run government rather than an elected one.

Seemingly Prayuth is on a loser in his bid to clean up a mega mess...............I would suggest the few that persist in their daily ritual get the rewards by having PTP back.

You must realize by now that I "slag off" an army run government because it has taken the place of an elected government. It could ( should) have ensured that an elected government was the result of the 2014 election. Instead it chose to take power itself ( and for itself).

The mess the country is in is a result of that.

This position, which I share with several others (who you consistently refer to as a "minority") is based on a fundamental belief in the importance of electoral democracy, and the right of the people of this ( our adopted) country to enjoy it.

Nothing twisted, nothing spun, and certainly no personal gain.

It's as simple as that. Disagree by all means, but please don't imply dishonesty.

The mess the country is in (your belief) it inherited a prosperous one ?????? and is in the mess now--(your saying) is because of Prayuth.cheesy.gifcheesy.gifcheesy.gifcheesy.gif ...This confirms what I thought about you and others. Blinkers come to mind. suppose a trillion baht lost apart from the mega corruption --tablets etc, was super democracy. and elections solve everything--because ?????? sorry not in this case.

Thanks for putting me in the picture to confirm your anti-PM stance.

I believe in democracy TRUE ONES. Do you honestly believe that without protests and intervention Thailand was heading in a good direction ?? The people here vote out governments when not paid---or are not told the truth about who is controlling them, and where the money is going into who's pockets..........not the Issan peoples---who elected them-------please confirm the small rice farmers were better off with PTP ???........this is a view from the top of the fence. without blinkers on but you will disagree with the facts, so no use in us talking further. It does not matter if there are, or are not elections---or who is ruling if the country is moving forward--the people will be happy----happy hens lay eggs.--------

Posted

Well you're right in one respect - there is no use us talking further.

Good luck with your happy hens.

Posted

Well you're right in one respect - there is no use us talking further.

Good luck with your happy hens.

You're right. There's absolutely no point in discussing the political situation in Thailand with people who actually believe that original sin started with Thaksin, is the root of all evil and that the junta really wants to change Thailand for the better.

And still believing this even after Uncle Too refused to reform the military, police and judiciary reveals a level of naivety bordering on the mentally disturbed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...