JHolmesJr Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 The way the scandies bend over to people who have no business making demands, I wouldn't be surprised if he wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard W Posted March 13, 2016 Share Posted March 13, 2016 This man murdered innocent children who is he to complain about human rights. They were trainee political activists, of a political persuasion Breivik blames for the humane policies that have allowed him to live. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGLV0121 Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 (edited) Radical/strict Islam is spreading like wildfire through north European prisons. The captive audience makes it a perfect environment for spreading their hate. Authorities are fine with all this. Now, put an individual with strong right wing views in prison and what happens? He is segregated in isolation to stop him spreading his ideals with fellow inmates. Double standards in a socialist country? Am not sure you whether you condone what this guy did. There are other ways to warn about dangers of muslim immigration than killing children and bombing administrative buildings. Am not sure either people up there in northern Europe want to listen what is action meant in his mind. His act of violence predicted what Europe is confronted with now. Edited March 14, 2016 by AGLV0121 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 An off topic post has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazzz Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 There are certain lines which cannot be crossed in this life. Taking the lives of others is one of them. When there are many peoples lives which have been taken, and the families of those victims shattered by this degree of senselessness, a far different set of laws should be applied, even in countries as liberal as Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. The families of the victims should be allowed to slaughter the man themselves. This could prove to be good therapy for them. If there is no degree of doubt, about the crime, there is no reason to let this worm live. Why should the state pay for that? Why should this cockroach be allowed to complain about this human rights? He is not a human being. He relinquished his right to be a human being when he committed this heinous act. It would be too kind to associate him with the human race. He is not a member, anymore. He opted out. So, treat him like the vermin he really is. Do not accord him those rights. Deny him. Give him special exemption status. Keep him in a cold, dark cell until the people can deliver their sentence. Correct, and this principle and respect for human life is exactly why the Norwegian People would never contemplate committing the criminal violations you suggest. Unlike you, their values cannot be manipulated by the evil committed by others. And the one thing in common of the bleeding hearts people like you who spout this rubbish is that your child was not one of the ones slaughtered by this man . Pretty much garranteed if your child was one of the victims your outlook would not be so forgiving. Perhaps you should respect the children he killed and the families left behind to grieve rather than the human life of this monster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spidermike007 Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 There are certain lines which cannot be crossed in this life. Taking the lives of others is one of them. When there are many peoples lives which have been taken, and the families of those victims shattered by this degree of senselessness, a far different set of laws should be applied, even in countries as liberal as Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. The families of the victims should be allowed to slaughter the man themselves. This could prove to be good therapy for them. If there is no degree of doubt, about the crime, there is no reason to let this worm live. Why should the state pay for that? Why should this cockroach be allowed to complain about this human rights? He is not a human being. He relinquished his right to be a human being when he committed this heinous act. It would be too kind to associate him with the human race. He is not a member, anymore. He opted out. So, treat him like the vermin he really is. Do not accord him those rights. Deny him. Give him special exemption status. Keep him in a cold, dark cell until the people can deliver their sentence. Correct, and this principle and respect for human life is exactly why the Norwegian People would never contemplate committing the criminal violations you suggest. Unlike you, their values cannot be manipulated by the evil committed by others. And the one thing in common of the bleeding hearts people like you who spout this rubbish is that your child was not one of the ones slaughtered by this man . Pretty much garranteed if your child was one of the victims your outlook would not be so forgiving. Perhaps you should respect the children he killed and the families left behind to grieve rather than the human life of this monster Correct. The point I was attempting to make is that he no longer has a human life. He is no longer a human being. He gave up that right, and that honor. He is now an insect. He has reduced himself to worm status. How many rights do you accord a worm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaidam Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 He removed the rights of other thus foregoing his rights! Too much emphasis on the "rights" of the criminals and not enough for the victims. You want to take a life, then be prepared to give up your own! End of message to all you bulls hit bleeding heart liberals and holier than thou people. Not true. First, Anders had his rights of free expression taken away by the far left govt. His thoughts and feelings were turned into crimes by the state, and his expressing of his views strictly forbidden. Funnily enough that led to a pressure cooker situation until he exploded and the rest is history. Knowing the smug untouchability of the left elite he knew he must do something extreme to get there attention. Well he certainly achieved that, and he alerted the far left to the fact that there are many like Anders that are proud of their culture and heritage and do not see the merit of turning the country into an Islamic state by the govt. Let's accept that the cause of the slaughter was the vile act by the left, of making all open concerns about migration illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Credo Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 He removed the rights of other thus foregoing his rights! Too much emphasis on the "rights" of the criminals and not enough for the victims. You want to take a life, then be prepared to give up your own! End of message to all you bulls hit bleeding heart liberals and holier than thou people. Not true. First, Anders had his rights of free expression taken away by the far left govt. His thoughts and feelings were turned into crimes by the state, and his expressing of his views strictly forbidden. Funnily enough that led to a pressure cooker situation until he exploded and the rest is history. Knowing the smug untouchability of the left elite he knew he must do something extreme to get there attention. Well he certainly achieved that, and he alerted the far left to the fact that there are many like Anders that are proud of their culture and heritage and do not see the merit of turning the country into an Islamic state by the govt. Let's accept that the cause of the slaughter was the vile act by the left, of making all open concerns about migration illegal. It's amazing when people can justify and explain away the actions of this man. He has rights that are protected by his gov't. Something that he has denied a lot of very innocent people. He killed innocent victims and his actions cannot be explained away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lvr181 Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 He removed the rights of other thus foregoing his rights! Too much emphasis on the "rights" of the criminals and not enough for the victims. You want to take a life, then be prepared to give up your own! End of message to all you bulls hit bleeding heart liberals and holier than thou people. Not true. First, Anders had his rights of free expression taken away by the far left govt. His thoughts and feelings were turned into crimes by the state, and his expressing of his views strictly forbidden. Funnily enough that led to a pressure cooker situation until he exploded and the rest is history. Knowing the smug untouchability of the left elite he knew he must do something extreme to get there attention. Well he certainly achieved that, and he alerted the far left to the fact that there are many like Anders that are proud of their culture and heritage and do not see the merit of turning the country into an Islamic state by the govt. Let's accept that the cause of the slaughter was the vile act by the left, of making all open concerns about migration illegal. Are you kidding me? This IS NOT a political debate - this is about criminality! Brevik's "view" and subsequent actions would be against the law in most countries and certainly not those of a decent human. Stop with the blaming of others in order to justify your support of Brevik's views. HE IS A MASS MURDERER in anyone's language. He would know what he was doing was wrong, yet he still did it - that is a criminal act! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splite Posted March 14, 2016 Share Posted March 14, 2016 Remember he didn't get 21 yrs. He got 21 ++ Means they will evaulate him for the rest of his life. He will never get out. Sounds weird but it's the way here. He will be there forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splite Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 (edited) He will loose this case, then the next, and the next, and the final one. Before he takes it to Strasbourg. Then he will not be allowed to be released. And then we will see him again every 5th year (think it's 5 years) Sad but true. But he will never be let out, never. 21++ is never never for him. Edited March 17, 2016 by Splite Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simple1 Posted March 17, 2016 Share Posted March 17, 2016 He removed the rights of other thus foregoing his rights! Too much emphasis on the "rights" of the criminals and not enough for the victims. You want to take a life, then be prepared to give up your own! End of message to all you bulls hit bleeding heart liberals and holier than thou people. Not true. First, Anders had his rights of free expression taken away by the far left govt. His thoughts and feelings were turned into crimes by the state, and his expressing of his views strictly forbidden. Funnily enough that led to a pressure cooker situation until he exploded and the rest is history. Knowing the smug untouchability of the left elite he knew he must do something extreme to get there attention. Well he certainly achieved that, and he alerted the far left to the fact that there are many like Anders that are proud of their culture and heritage and do not see the merit of turning the country into an Islamic state by the govt. Let's accept that the cause of the slaughter was the vile act by the left, of making all open concerns about migration illegal. Are you kidding me? This IS NOT a political debate - this is about criminality! Brevik's "view" and subsequent actions would be against the law in most countries and certainly not those of a decent human. Stop with the blaming of others in order to justify your support of Brevik's views. HE IS A MASS MURDERER in anyone's language. He would know what he was doing was wrong, yet he still did it - that is a criminal act! Perhaps you do not understand that member Jaidam has on a number of occasions posted pro / Neo Nazi support; some posts went too far & were removed for such content. Ipso facto the member supports the extreme far right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now