Jump to content

Judge in Texas temporarily blocks Obama's transgender rules


webfact

Recommended Posts

Judge in Texas temporarily blocks Obama's transgender rules

By PAUL J. WEBER

 

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge in Texas has blocked the Obama administration's order that requires public schools to let transgender students use the bathrooms and locker rooms consistent with their chosen gender identity.

 

In a temporary injunction signed Sunday, U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor ruled that the federal education law known as Title IX "is not ambiguous" about sex being defined as "the biological and anatomical differences between male and female students as determined at their birth."

 

The judge said the order would apply nationwide. The ruling, he said, was not about the policy issues of transgender rights but about his conclusion that federal officials simply did not follow rules that required an opportunity for comment before such directives are issued.

 

"This case presents the difficult issue of balancing the protection of students' rights and that of personal privacy ... while ensuring that no student is unnecessarily marginalized while attending school," he wrote.

 

The ruling was the second recent setback for transgender advocates. Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a Virginia school board can block for now a transgender male from using the boys' restroom while justices decide whether to fully intervene.

 

Texas and 12 other states challenged the White House directive as unconstitutional.

 

The judge also sided with Republican state leaders who argued that schools should have been allowed to weigh in before the White House mandate was announced in May.

 

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, had argued that halting the Obama order before school began was necessary because districts risked losing federal education dollars if they did not comply. Federal officials did not explicitly make that threat upon issuing the directive, although they also never ruled out the possibility.

 

"This president is attempting to rewrite the laws enacted by the elected representatives of the people and is threating to take away federal funding from schools to force them to conform," Paxton said. "That cannot be allowed to continue, which is why we took action to protect states and school districts."

 

The Justice Department issued a brief statement saying it was disappointed in the ruling and was reviewing its options. If the Obama administration challenges the injunction, the case would head next to the New Orleans-based 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

 

Supporters of Obama's directive also questioned how a district judge in Wichita Falls, Texas, could issue a blanket injunction for the entire U.S. when higher courts elsewhere have upheld transgender rights.

 

One example is the Virginia school board case: Even though the Supreme Court is keeping the status quo for now, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the board discriminated against the transgender student.

 

"It's Wichita Falls. It doesn't have jurisdiction over the entire country," said Josh Block, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union.

The ruling does not prohibit schools that allow transgender students to use the facilities of their choice from continuing to do so.

 

Paul Castillo is a Dallas attorney for the gay rights group Lambda Legal, which had urged the court to let the White House directive stand. He said the latest ruling was a continuation of attacks on transgender people.

 

"I think today is going to be a hard day for transgender students," Castillo said. "The decision is certainly emotional and certainly an attack on transgender students' dignity."

 

The federal government issued the mandate days after the Justice Department sued North Carolina over a state law that requires people to use public bathrooms that correspond with the sex on their birth certificate. U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch likened that law to the policies of racial segregation. Republicans have argued such laws are commonsense privacy safeguards.

 

The Obama administration had told the court that recipients of federal education dollars were "clearly on notice" that anti-discrimination polices must be followed. Texas alone gets roughly $10 billion in federal education funds.

 

The lawsuit was filed in May by Texas, Alabama, Wisconsin, West Virginia, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Utah and Georgia, and the Republican governors of Maine, Mississippi and Kentucky. Two small school districts in Arizona and Texas, which have fewer than 600 students combined and no transgender persons on their campuses, also joined the effort to prevent the directive from being enforced.

 

Last year, O'Connor granted an order that temporarily blocked federal rules that would have expanded medical leave benefits to some gay couples.

 
ap_logo.jpg
-- © Associated Press 2016-08-23
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Let's just cut to the chase.  Declare that all people must become bi-sexual, anyone refusing sex with a same sex suitor or a person of different ethnicity will be arrested and treated at a sexual promiscuity treatment center, there will be only one toilet to be used by all, toilet areas have official approval as an acceptable place for consenting adults to engage openly in sex, (no more hiding behind stall doors), people having children will be severely taxed and have to take their children to the nearest wooded area to use the toilet, and women who become pregnant need only contact a local abortion doctor for an in-home procedure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Rod Gold said:

Let's just cut to the chase.  Declare that all people must become bi-sexual, anyone refusing sex with a same sex suitor or a person of different ethnicity will be arrested and treated at a sexual promiscuity treatment center, there will be only one toilet to be used by all, toilet areas have official approval as an acceptable place for consenting adults to engage openly in sex, (no more hiding behind stall doors), people having children will be severely taxed and have to take their children to the nearest wooded area to use the toilet, and women who become pregnant need only contact a local abortion doctor for an in-home procedure. 

 

Wasn't it a certain Texas senator who was worried about "mandatory gay marriage"?

:whistling:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Pinot said:

Texans don't like queers. What's $10 billion when there is a principle involved? Queers gotta pee where god wants em to pee. Or something like that. Texans. Asshats. 

Don't pee on the Alamo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Texans have such a double standard and morale, of course the drill sergeant will say so, he love to abuse young gays. There is a very high procentage of S/M interested specially sadistic dominant guys in Texas and they don't mind if it's a male or female they are using. Seems that they get off more using males.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Justice Department issued a brief statement saying it was disappointed in the ruling and was reviewing its options

Since when was the justice department allowed to be regretful in public? Their job is to enforce the law, not go around telling everybody that they don't like what the law is.

This exposes everything that is wrong with the, IMO, politically  biased justice department in Obama's government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Rod Gold said:

Let's just cut to the chase.  Declare that all people must become bi-sexual, anyone refusing sex with a same sex suitor or a person of different ethnicity will be arrested and treated at a sexual promiscuity treatment center, there will be only one toilet to be used by all, toilet areas have official approval as an acceptable place for consenting adults to engage openly in sex, (no more hiding behind stall doors), people having children will be severely taxed and have to take their children to the nearest wooded area to use the toilet, and women who become pregnant need only contact a local abortion doctor for an in-home procedure. 

Sounds more heaven than hell really,  but that' s just me and who am I to begrudge you your dystopian sex nightmare. Might I add just one little thing? You've forgotten the animals. There are always animals in this type of straight man night sweat. The kind that get and give rectal abuse and are then  married to sex warped bipeds. No, I've seen it in my dreams.

 

You wanna speak to Guillerom Del Toro about this scenario - maybe he can develop it into one his movies. One like Pans Labyrinth. Be sure though to ask Donald if he can come to the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Boon Mee said:

Excellent decision.

I don't want to find a 'transgender' in my daughter's bathroom when she as to go...:thumbsup:

 

Surely the girls' toilets have private cubicles? What are your thoughts on unisex changing rooms?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Neurath said:

Sounds more heaven than hell really,  but that' s just me and who am I to begrudge you your dystopian sex nightmare. Might I add just one little thing? You've forgotten the animals. There are always animals in this type of straight man night sweat. The kind that get and give rectal abuse and are then  married to sex warped bipeds. No, I've seen it in my dreams.

 

You wanna speak to Guillerom Del Toro about this scenario - maybe he can develop it into one his movies. One like Pans Labyrinth. Be sure though to ask Donald if he can come to the US.

I will give you credit to being true and open about your moral decay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...