Jump to content








OAG told to indict three ex-Pheu Thai MPs in Supreme Court


webfact

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, ramrod711 said:

 

 deliberating cutting short the time for debating on the amendments draft to just one day to prevent opposition members for debating on the draft

 

But, but, they were elected and that means that they are entitled to do anything they want, no matter how underhanded.

 

The original 1997 constitution that was enshrined by the people already had it's rules of election of the senate. It was illegally changed, while the people were ordered to accept the changes or no elections by underhanded soso's.

The government that was elected back in "again" simply tried to change it back to the true will of the people. I don't understand why the first change ordered by the barrel of a gun is legal and the second change by the elected government is illegal. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...