Jump to content

Yingluck's assets seizure case to be wrapped up in few days: Dr Wisanu


webfact

Recommended Posts

On 9/16/2016 at 4:17 PM, smutcakes said:

 

 

You cannot punish someone or find someone guilty about what they might have done in the future, if theoretically something had happened!:cheesy:

 

Funny how despite all the corruption, the prices of most of the schemes PTP came up with the prices of them have increased under the Junta. Make of that what you may.......

 

Care to share prices of what went up? seems to be the same if not dropping due to low demand around the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

On September 16, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Baerboxer said:

 

You do include the Shins in the Chinese elite do you? Which of course they are, and most certainly not interested in raising the standard of anyone's life but their own.

If politicians were negligent in managing schemes, and deliberately dressed those schemes up to keep them off budget, away from scrutiny and refused to reveal accounts, then yes, they'd probably get prosecuted too in most countries.

 

now you are just making stuff  up.... 

 

Unless the actions were illegal (under EXISTING laws) then of course most countries would have NO REASON to prosecute such a politician. 

 

Which leads me to believe that you are simply and purposefully ignoring the reason that Yingluck is being taken to trial. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎16‎/‎09‎/‎2016 at 8:28 AM, Valentine said:

There is no one on trial for those.

 

On ‎16‎/‎09‎/‎2016 at 8:42 AM, jamesbrock said:

 

That's kind of my point.

 

What kind of country seizes the personal assets of officials responsible for costly, failed, poorly implemented schemes?

 

In 2009 Australia's then PM Kevin Rudd implemented the the ill-fated $2.8 billion Home Insulation Program (HIP), part of the economic stimulus strategy after the GFC. Four lives were lost, several workers were injured and about 120 houses caught fire in a program employing more than 12,000 people in the space of a year before it was terminated. The ensuing Royal Commission into the scheme described it as "a litany of errors". There was never a call to seize Mr Rudd's personal assets - the very thought is ludicrous.

 

Wasn't the scanner approved by the General? But you are right JB the ones judging now are the ones involved in the projects u raised. Go figure.:thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...