Jump to content

Trump apologizes, but also calls crude remarks a distraction


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Just now, SoiBiker said:

 

Because he wasn't running for president until now, I'd imagine. 

 

It's still a little late in the day I think. But perhaps they think he has a good chance of winning and decided to throw a spanner in the works.

 

But some voters seem to be viewing him as good leader in spite of the damaging video: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-37599788

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Of course no doubt all of the quotes in this link will be lies and Clinton is on par with Mother Theresa isn't she. 

 

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/list-hillarys-filthy-fking-potty-mouth-puts-trump-shame/

 

I could understand if Trump had been caught saying this crap last week, last month or even last year but nearly 11 years ago :shock1:

<deleted> talk about desperation on the Dems side

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SaintLouisBlues said:

True. Whether it was an "error of judgement in allowing it to be recorded" depends on whether you believe that everyone, always, is carefully considering everything that goes on around them every minute of the day.

Trump and Bush were not alone during the discussion—they were accompanied by a two-person camera crew, a bus driver, an Access Hollywood producer, a production assistant, Trump’s security guard, and his press representative.

http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/10/billy-bush-donald-trump-access-hollywood

The locker room was full.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, uksomchai said:

Of course no doubt all of the quotes in this link will be lies and Clinton is on par with Mother Theresa isn't she. 

 

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/list-hillarys-filthy-fking-potty-mouth-puts-trump-shame/

 

I could understand if Trump had been caught saying this crap last week, last month or even last year but nearly 11 years ago :shock1:

<deleted> talk about desperation on the Dems side

 

Whereas going on about what her husband did 20 years ago is fine?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NYT:

Many people, well, many men, are expressing their disgust with Mr. Trump the only way they know how: By invoking their mothers and daughters and sisters — people, presumably, with the anatomy Mr. Trump feels free to assess and knead. Hillary Clinton has been showing us all year, and all her life, that, sure, women can be cherished if you want, but they also can be president.

Meanwhile, right-wing lawmakers are scrambling, sanctimonious and pathetic, to distance themselves from their own hideous progeny, clearly hoping to salvage some personal credibility and perhaps even save their party.

Full article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/09/opinion/sunday/donald-and-billy-on-the-bus.html

Edited by metisdead
Edited as per fair use policy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

US election: Trump camp on attack ahead of debate

 

"The tape recording of Mr Trump dates back to 2005 when he was appearing as a guest on a soap opera. 

In it he says, "you can do anything" to women "when you're a star" and is heard saying "grab them by the pussy".

 

"Mr Trump's third wife Melania - whom he married a few months before the 2005 recording and who was pregnant at the time -  :whistling:

has called his comments "unacceptable and offensive".

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37602090

 

Fancy that.

A married man with a pregnant wife at the time...

 

Deplorable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SoiBiker said:

 

I doubt the emails bothered them much - they don't appear to have revealed anything interesting. 

 

LOL. 

 

Other than shes a stooge of big business whose policies treat hardworking americans like crap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

 

LOL. 

 

Other than shes a stooge of big business whose policies treat hardworking americans like crap. 

Let's see. Trump wants to give billionaires huge tax breaks. He wants to abolish Dodd Frank so Wall Street can go back to endangering the entire U.S. economy. And abolish the Consumer Protection Bureau. You know, the one that just clawed back about 200 million from Wells Fargo.

Clinton wants to raise taxes on the wealthy, and further tighten restrictions on Wall Street.  And she's the stooge of big business?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A question was posed as to why know just before the 2nd debate was this audio released. Some speculated that it was a conspiracy by the Democrats.

Here is the response from NBC:

http://www.aol.com/article/news/2016/10/09/why-wait-ted-cruz-asks-why-nbc-didnt-release-damning-tapes/21577775/

Notably the audio was owned by Mark Burnett, who produced the show and is friendly with Trump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Srikcir said:

A question was posed as to why know just before the 2nd debate was this audio released. Some speculated that it was a conspiracy by the Democrats.

 

 

Conspiracy no. Strategy most likely. Alot of the stuff being released now was public at the time, it's not like it's been buried in some kind of cover up by Trump or the GOP. Hillary got where she is by playing the game better than most and Trump has given her plenty of ammo to use and he continues to do so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama had his "clinging to religion and guns" comment leaked.  Romney's 47% comment. 

 

Trump has crawled down into the bottom of the barrel with this Bill Clinton, sexual predator/rapist theme. Not a smart move for a smart guy like him to chuck moral rocks from his house made of glass.   Sure enough, Murphy's Law strikes and out comes the Access Hollywood bus recording.   Trump's actually dodged a bullet on this one, it could of been much worse.  But in this, there's no ambiguity, no he said/she said he can spin, just a clear insight into the mind of @ Real Donald Trump, in his own words.  He doesn't even deny it.  

 

Instead, he turns right around and associates himself as golf buddies with Bill Clinton, the same guy he's been publicly shaming as a sexual predator and rapist for weeks, and asserts that this kind of locker room banter was normal even for them.  In Trump's Machiavellian way of thinking, that gets it out there as being all good and normal and allows him to parse it by essentially saying, "Yeah, but hey, at least I'm not AS bad as HIM!"   So there you have it, the new gold plated standard for Trump is to compare and contrast his douche baggery with a guy he says is a sexual predator and rapist.   Brilliant move, Donald.  :blink:

 

I wonder what he's going to say when the next handful of @ Real Mud comes out about him, and you know it will, probably very soon.  He's already put himself down in the same league with Bill Clinton, so maybe he'll just shrug his shoulders, grimace into the camera and in his New York accent say, "Yeah yeah, Whud Evaaa".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/8/2016 at 10:23 PM, dunroaming said:

 

Agreed but it's only flagged up because he is standing for President and choosing to try to slur his opponent. Same thing from both sides and it just ends up as a street brawl.  Embarrassing on so many levels!

 

Don't you mean "trying to slur her opponent"? The Dems are digging up the dirt first. He is reacting to it. First the Beauty queen, then the bragging tape. Not an excuse but do you really expect him to say nothing? His slurs on her are not direct;y originated from his camp but multi sources online for months apart from the new Assange ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Srikcir said:

I'm still interested in this thrice attempted suit from the woman who claimed, when she was 13, serviced Trump and was later raped by him while tied to a bed with pantyhose at one of the parties thrown in NYC back in the day by Jeremy Epstein - later convicted for soliciting underage girls for sex/pedophilia.   Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, Jeremy Epstein..... the social connections and interactions between these 3 guys are there.

 

In the last few days, a Federal judge has revitalized this case, which has been bubbling around in the background for a year.  

Fed Judge Order Link

 

Not champing at the bit about this, but if there's fire behind this smoke, which is starting to feel more and more likely, then it deserves some more looking into.

Edited by 55Jay
fix link
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To all the girls, SJWs and Snowflakes on this forum who think that Donald Trump's comments are dangerous, mean, sexist and maybe even against their mental gender... and that Mrs. Clinton supports their sexual orientation or preferences:

WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton Is Privately Against Gays

Many gay voters are realizing the damage she could bring to LGBT communities. An influx of refugees from anti-gay countries is a major conflict with deadly implications for gays. Many refugees share a common value that they should kill gays by throwing them off buildings or executed if outed.

 

Just be careful who or what you cheer for. Mrs. Clinton, who officially has her own private and public opinions, could also have some really ugly surprises in store for you.

 

Don't expect this to be reported by your trusted MSM (or TV for that matter), because they are your friends. Right? Just don't be too much disappointed once you find out the hard way that you were played, too, by her and your trusted media.

Remember? According to her, already ole "honest" Abe did lie... And there is never a problem with a "good lie", especially if it could concerns yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Andreas2 said:

Just be careful who or what you cheer for.

Glenn Beck just announced that Hillary Clinton is the best moral and ethical choice for President.

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/10/glenn-beck-electing-hillary-clinton-moral-ethical-choice/

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/10/10/glenn-beck-electing-hillary-clinton-moral-ethical-choice/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Andreas2 said:

To all the girls, SJWs and Snowflakes on this forum who think that Donald Trump's comments are dangerous, mean, sexist and maybe even against their mental gender... and that Mrs. Clinton supports their sexual orientation or preferences:

WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton Is Privately Against Gays

Many gay voters are realizing the damage she could bring to LGBT communities. An influx of refugees from anti-gay countries is a major conflict with deadly implications for gays. Many refugees share a common value that they should kill gays by throwing them off buildings or executed if outed.

 

Just be careful who or what you cheer for. Mrs. Clinton, who officially has her own private and public opinions, could also have some really ugly surprises in store for you.

 

 

Can you perhaps point out to me that Hillary's current stance is against gays? I took a look at the email from Wikileaks (linked below) and it is about explaining her pivot from being against gay marriage 20+ years ago (different time and mindset) to her current stance on being pro gay marriage. Kudos to her for adapting and moving along with the times. I know several people who have changed their minds over the past 20 some years on gay marriage.

 

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/2631

 

The line you state in your post "Many gay voters are realizing the damage she could bring to LGBT communities" comes from the web article you linked to and is a matter of opinion and not fact. It is not in the Wikileaks email.

Edited by Silurian
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Andreas2 said:

To all the girls, SJWs and Snowflakes on this forum who think that Donald Trump's comments are dangerous, mean, sexist and maybe even against their mental gender... and that Mrs. Clinton supports their sexual orientation or preferences:

WikiLeaks: Hillary Clinton Is Privately Against Gays

Many gay voters are realizing the damage she could bring to LGBT communities. An influx of refugees from anti-gay countries is a major conflict with deadly implications for gays. Many refugees share a common value that they should kill gays by throwing them off buildings or executed if outed.

 

Just be careful who or what you cheer for. Mrs. Clinton, who officially has her own private and public opinions, could also have some really ugly surprises in store for you.

 

Yawn. :coffee1:

 

Alex Jones anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll take much more than an apology for trump ...

Just make him STOP! :post-4641-1156693976:

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/donald-trump-is-four-centuries-too-late/2016/10/11/a1e86e02-8fec-11e6-9c85-ac42097b8cc0_story.html?hpid=hp_no-name_opinion-card-c%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.60eb84201c17

 

 

Quote

 

Donald Trump is four centuries too late

The man is a 70-year-old adolescent,

A playboy, a teen queen, a juvie.

Take him away, give him a suppressant,

Mr. Trump would have enjoyed the 17th century, the tumult, the divine right of kings, the suppression of Parliament. Vituperation was normal discourse, the idea of privileged sexual aggression was common in high places, money flowed freely, rich men commissioned great monuments to themselves. He was in excellent form on Sunday night, strutting, stalking, words and phrases flowing out of him like water from a hose — “disaster” and “horrible” over and over — and if you put him on Grub Street in 1650, he’d be magnificent in his great swirling robes, surrounded by courtiers and sycophants, ranting against the Puritans, supporting the monarchy, smiting his enemies.

 

 

Edited by Jingthing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone told me that Trump is doing unexpectedly well in the polls with the gay vote; I suspect it's the great hair, good teeth and snappy dressing that are favoured by the gay community , perhaps rather than policies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Prbkk said:

Someone told me that Trump is doing unexpectedly well in the polls with the gay vote; I suspect it's the great hair, good teeth and snappy dressing that are favoured by the gay community , perhaps rather than policies.

No. That is NOT happening. Why would you post such idiotic garbage? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...