Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Problem with visa extension on Poipet

Featured Replies

Hello. 
Last time when I was crossing the Cambodia-Thailand  Poipet border  to open my another 90 days extension based on marriage non o multi visa, I 've got some nasty surprise. They told me that I must stop to do forth and back, and back to Thailand to make 1 year extension which requires either possession of 400k baht on Thai bank account or income of 40,000 baht from regular job in Thailand. Otherwise, as they told me, I can only leave Thailand but cannot back by land only via airport arrival, however thankfully I've been lucky enough that day to re-enter Thailand by land later. 
My questions are, was it  legitimate for them to ask me to do so? Currently, does that thing happen on other border check points too? Is it some new border regulation? If so, does anyone can post it here.

In short, it means even having a valid non O multi visa, it cannot be extended for a new 90 days entry  in further. Is this correct, or they just tried to frighten me?  

Thanks for replies. 

Edited by Someguyy
edit some details

That is just Poi Pet nonsense. I think they are trying to discourage people from using the crossing.

You would have no problem at another crossing.

Ban Laem is good crossing and is only a little further from Bangkok than Poi Pet.

Another option is Ban Pu Nam Ron crossing in Kanchanaburi to Myanmar.

There was a guy on here a while back who was questioned by H.Yai immigration office that he was on the wrong visa and should be extending rather than bouncing borders on a multi. I don't know the regs on this, but if you think about it, I guess the multi-O in the case of marriage is for those who travel a fair amount and don't spend all their time here, whereas to stay here long-term one should be extending and showing the money. Could they legitimately start making those on these visas extend instead? Would they have any grounds for refusing re-entry? 

They could make grounds to refuse entry if wanted.

Main thing is for users be fussy on port of entry and perhaps have a little holiday rather than a same hour border hop.

You can get 60 day extensions so only need go out the country every 5 months and just before visa expiry if want maximum length from it .

Just use less popular borders, poipet always has been a problem as every bkk boiler room boy and visa vans and bombers used it and the dodgy officers for over a decade .

Absolute awful place and only used as people too lazy go bit further or actually travel for 2 or 3 days

22 minutes ago, BuckBee said:

You can get 60 day extensions so only need go out the country every 5 months and just before visa expiry if want maximum length from it .

 

Aren't you only allowed one 60 day extension per initial visa entry? Would each additional time you do a border hop to get another 90 days on your still valid visa be considered a new visa entry?

I had 2 extensions on one year ME type O before via changwattana whether correct to current rules or rules at time I am unsure as are immigration generally :-)

My understanding was 1 extension possible to every stamped entry .

Edited by BuckBee

18 minutes ago, Suradit69 said:

 

Aren't you only allowed one 60 day extension per initial visa entry? Would each additional time you do a border hop to get another 90 days on your still valid visa be considered a new visa entry?

The restriction is only one per entry. You may be thinking of a person an extension stay that could only do one for the life of it unless a new visa entry was done.

In October (at Samui Imm) I had a nasty shock when I applied for the 60 day extension.

 

Approaching the end date of a one year ext (a string of one year exts) I applied for a 60 day but was refused as I had previously had a 60 day, a few years back. I had been in and out on re-entry permits since then so this kept the link to the original visa 'live'. :crazy:

 

My point is not each and every entry stamp can be extended, it is different on extensions where only one 60 day is allowed for the original visa.

 

It may also differ according to your local office, your appearance, the official's sabainess levels, etc, etc...

Edited by ParadiseLost
Sorry to repeat UJ - he was quicker to the draw.

8 hours ago, ubonjoe said:

That is just Poi Pet nonsense. I think they are trying to discourage people from using the crossing.

You would have no problem at another crossing.

Ban Laem is good crossing and is only a little further from Bangkok than Poi Pet.

Another option is Ban Pu Nam Ron crossing in Kanchanaburi to Myanmar.

 

 

Koh kong is also good whatever people who know nothing tell on their blogs.

 

 

5 hours ago, ParadiseLost said:

In October (at Samui Imm) I had a nasty shock when I applied for the 60 day extension.

 

Approaching the end date of a one year ext (a string of one year exts) I applied for a 60 day but was refused as I had previously had a 60 day, a few years back. I had been in and out on re-entry permits since then so this kept the link to the original visa 'live'. :crazy:

 

My point is not each and every entry stamp can be extended, it is different on extensions where only one 60 day is allowed for the original visa.

 

It may also differ according to your local office, your appearance, the official's sabainess levels, etc, etc...

 

I recall a similar problem described in another post a few months back.  I believe the consensus was that a "re-entry permit" entry does not count as a "new entry" for purposes of getting an extension on that entry - but entries on a multiple not using a "re-entry permit" do allow one extension per-each. 

 

Please correct me if if I am wrong on this (perhaps varies by immigration-office?)

9 hours ago, Someguyy said:

My questions are, was it  legitimate for them to ask me to do so? Currently, does that thing happen on other border check points too? Is it some new border regulation?

The ME Non 'O' Visa, within the visa system, is meant for frequent visits and not as a method to live in Thailand. Those that want to live in Thailand with their wife are supposed to apply for an extension of stay, or a visa that provides long term permission to stay. It seem that this border crossing is, for some reason, trying to enforce the system.

 

There are plenty of other border crossings that you will be able to do an out/in border hop for a new 90 day permit to stay (not an extension).

11 hours ago, ubonjoe said:

That is just Poi Pet nonsense. I think they are trying to discourage people from using the crossing.

You would have no problem at another crossing.

Ban Laem is good crossing and is only a little further from Bangkok than Poi Pet.

Another option is Ban Pu Nam Ron crossing in Kanchanaburi to Myanmar.

They wouldn't let me cross in 89,a couple of KR kids with rifles they could hardly hold up.Never been there again.

4 hours ago, elviajero said:

The ME Non 'O' Visa, within the visa system, is meant for frequent visits and not as a method to live in Thailand. Those that want to live in Thailand with their wife are supposed to apply for an extension of stay, or a visa that provides long term permission to stay. It seem that this border crossing is, for some reason, trying to enforce the system.

 

There are plenty of other border crossings that you will be able to do an out/in border hop for a new 90 day permit to stay (not an extension).

 

 

This is your way to understand but nothing tell that we cannot live here with a multiple O.

Facts are against what you are saying or people could not live here 20 years with a multiple O...

The only reason to make a year extension is to avoid going out every 3 months, Nothing else.

 

 

 

 

 

1 hour ago, elviajero said:

IME visas being used to live in the country are now on the radar.

 

 

You are dreaming your life. So ridiculous.

 

 

  • Author
14 hours ago, elviajero said:

The ME Non 'O' Visa, within the visa system, is meant for frequent visits and not as a method to live in Thailand.

 

Can you show any OFFICIAL records? Unless they make an official document  stating that thing you've just said, then this is nothing more than nonsense.  

After all,  even they'll make it official rule, I'm sure it will be criticized by vast majority of farangs because it seems Thai authorities barriering  them from their beloved spouses, and forcing to leave Thailand for not holding job or that 400k baht. 

15 hours ago, elviajero said:

The ME Non 'O' Visa, within the visa system, is meant for frequent visits and not as a method to live in Thailand. Those that want to live in Thailand with their wife are supposed to apply for an extension of stay, or a visa that provides long term permission to stay. It seem that this border crossing is, for some reason, trying to enforce the system.

 

There are plenty of other border crossings that you will be able to do an out/in border hop for a new 90 day permit to stay (not an extension).

 

Can you explain to everybody how this "system" works?

 

Feel free to link to a Official site if you wish

16 hours ago, elviajero said:

The ME Non 'O' Visa, within the visa system, is meant for frequent visits and not as a method to live in Thailand. Those that want to live in Thailand with their wife are supposed to apply for an extension of stay, or a visa that provides long term permission to stay. It seem that this border crossing is, for some reason, trying to enforce the system.

 

There are plenty of other border crossings that you will be able to do an out/in border hop for a new 90 day permit to stay (not an extension).

a lot of assumptions for one post, tinged with a bit of scare posting

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.