3 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

You know she may have a higher IQ who knows. I always believe IQ is over rated. Once again you are wrong I despise her arrogance and the fact that she has the audacity, to tell people they do not know what they voted for. I know those who voted for remain what they voted for, as those who voted leave. Saying they are stupid and uneducated is disgraceful and I have not come anyone with her utter contempt for people, since reading your posts here.

I think your position is quite clear. You have no time for people who disagree with you, for people you believe to have a higher IQ than you, for people you believe to be more intelligent than you. OK, fine. I'm sure you're correct. You'll excuse me if I stay with the arrogant remainers. ?

4 hours ago, rockingrobin said:

Are you saying the subsequent arrests that took place is fake

 

I am saying that she is prone to exaggeration (as stated in my post to which you replied, which you must have missed).

10 minutes ago, Khun Han said:

 

I am saying that she is prone to exaggeration (as stated in my post to which you replied, which you must have missed).

On what basis are you making this  ' prone to exaggeration ' statement ?

4 minutes ago, rockingrobin said:

On what basis are you making this  ' prone to exaggeration ' statement ?

 

On the basis of the Reuters interview that I linked, and another interview where she was suggesting that most of her co-claimants had dropped out of the claim because of personal abuse, when the truth was that it was a simple legal procedure to combine the claims.

6 minutes ago, Khun Han said:

 

On the basis of the Reuters interview that I linked, and another interview where she was suggesting that most of her co-claimants had dropped out of the claim because of personal abuse, when the truth was that it was a simple legal procedure to combine the claims.

So without any  evidence  contrary to the abuse , and in light of the courts comments and action with regards the abuse. The police advice and subsequent arrests , you conclude G.Miller is prone to exaggeration .

One of the claimants did not attend the SC ruling due to the level of abuse

I think it is you yourself exaggerating    

13 minutes ago, rockingrobin said:

So without any  evidence  contrary to the abuse , and in light of the courts comments and action with regards the abuse. The police advice and subsequent arrests , you conclude G.Miller is prone to exaggeration .

One of the claimants did not attend the SC ruling due to the level of abuse

I think it is you yourself exaggerating    

 

No, Gina Miller highlights her own exaggerations. I don't need to enhance them, I only have to reference them. But, nice try at obfuscation. Are you a lawyer?

They are going to make it as difficult as possible for the UK,to

deter any other EU countries jumping a sinking ship.

It the EU (Common Market) had of just stayed as that,things would

have been great,but they wanted more and more integration,more

laws,regulations, and this divorce settlement of Billions they are 

expecting,just tell them to EUCK off

regards Worgeordie

21 hours ago, worgeordie said:

They are going to make it as difficult as possible for the UK,to

deter any other EU countries jumping a sinking ship.

It the EU (Common Market) had of just stayed as that,things would

have been great,but they wanted more and more integration,more

laws,regulations, and this divorce settlement of Billions they are 

expecting,just tell them to EUCK off

regards Worgeordie

Quite apart from the UK telling the EU to f... off over the EU claim that 50/60 bn is owed for future obligations - I thought this would be more than offset by the UK's share of EU assets?