Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Brexit’s Legacy Still Divides Britain a Decade Later

Ten years after voters chose to leave the European Union, Brexit remains one of the most consequential and divisive events in modern British history.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

In the June 23, 2016 referendum, 52% of voters backed leaving the EU, setting the United Kingdom on a path that ultimately ended nearly five decades of integration with the European bloc. Although the vote was close, it triggered sweeping political, economic and social changes. The formal departure process took almost five years to complete.

Brexit emerged amid growing public frustration with the EU and broader dissatisfaction following the 2008 global financial crisis. Supporters argued that Britain would regain control of its affairs and unlock new economic opportunities outside the bloc. Critics warned that leaving would damage trade, weaken economic growth and reduce the country's international influence.

Economic Impact Remains a Key Debate

Brexit supporters envisioned a more agile economy able to thrive independently through new trade relationships and greater policy flexibility. However, the expected economic revival has yet to materialize.

Businesses have faced additional barriers when trading with the EU, which remains the UK's largest trading partner. While British exports are not subject to EU tariffs, firms must contend with customs procedures, certification requirements and other regulatory checks. Several trade agreements promoted during the Brexit campaign, including a major deal with the United States, have not been achieved.

screenshot_3919.jpg

Economists estimate the British economy is between 4% and 8% smaller than it would have been if the country had remained in the EU. Critics say this has reduced living standards and limited funding available for public services, including the National Health Service.

According to analysts, Brexit's effects have been gradual rather than sudden, weighing on trade, investment and productivity over time.

Supporters of Brexit counter that the long-term benefits should not be judged solely on short-term economic performance, arguing that greater national control over policies, particularly immigration, remains a significant achievement.

Immigration Remains a Flashpoint

Ending free movement between the UK and EU was a central Brexit objective. Migration from EU countries has fallen sharply, but arrivals from outside Europe increased after visa rules were expanded to address labor shortages in sectors such as social care.

Overall net migration has declined significantly, falling from more than 900,000 in 2023 to 171,000 last year.

However, public concern remains focused on irregular migration, particularly migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats. Although these arrivals represent only a small share of total migration, the issue has become a major political battleground. Protests have taken place outside accommodation facilities housing asylum seekers, with some demonstrations turning violent.

Public Opinion Has Shifted

Britain's political landscape has been reshaped by Brexit. Support for the traditionally dominant Conservative and Labour parties has weakened, while the anti-establishment Reform UK party, led by Nigel Farage, has gained ground and led many opinion polls.

screenshot_3920.jpg

Surveys suggest public sentiment has become increasingly skeptical about Brexit. Recent polling indicates a majority of Britons would support rejoining the EU, while many believe Brexit has produced worse outcomes than expected.

Rejoining the EU Remains Unlikely

Despite growing public dissatisfaction, a return to the EU appears politically difficult.

The governing Labour Party has ruled out reversing Brexit or re-entering the EU's single market. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has instead pursued a limited reset of relations with Brussels aimed at improving cooperation and reducing trade friction.

His potential successor, Andy Burnham, has also rejected calls to seek renewed EU membership, arguing that the result of the 2016 referendum should be respected.

A decade after the vote, Brexit remains unresolved in one important sense: while the UK has left the EU, the debate over whether it was the right decision continues to shape British politics and public opinion.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 22 June 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Tyke Silver Member

Tyke

Advanced Member

Farage and johnson were largely responsible for degrading the UK's economy, border security and world standing. Reform would do even more damage. Farage, reform and restore are toxic.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member

Sore losers lacking the maturity to accept the democratic process when it goes against them.

Vive la Brexit.

Palatus Senior Member

Palatus

Member
7 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Sore losers lacking the maturity to accept the democratic process when it goes against them.

More a case of the democratic process allows for more people who don't know what they are voting for get what they deserve?

Democracy’s double-edged sword, right? It holds power accountable, but also hands it to whoever’s loudest or most misled. Brexit was less "vive la liberté" and more a Rorschach test for national frustration. The real cost? Clarity. Once the dust settled, even the winners had to ask: What exactly did we vote for?


You see it everywhere — when emotion drowns out detail, the "democratic win" can feel more like collective self-sabotage. But calling voters "sore losers" or "deserving" misses the deeper rot: systems that don’t educate, leaders who don’t clarify, and campaigns that weaponize hope.

So maybe the democratic process works… until it reveals how broken the foundation really is.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, Palatus said:

More a case of the democratic process allows for more people who don't know what they are voting for get what they deserve?

We are talking about Brexit not Starmer becoming PM.

Thingamabob Diamond Member

Thingamabob

Advanced Member

Brits now have the worst of two undesirable alternatives. They are living in a country that has declared Brexit but has not implemented it, the alternative being trying to re-enter the corrupt EU at enormous cost. What a mess.

animalmagic Gold Member

animalmagic

Advanced Member
31 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

The UK doesnt have a president.

It has Brexit though. Its the topic of this thread.

Thank you for that clarification, I really didn't know.

But you are all for democratic processes that deliver the result you desire, and then not permitting another democratic process should the people change their minds at a later date due to better insight and greater understanding?

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
22 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Brits now have the worst of two undesirable alternatives. They are living in a country that has declared Brexit but has not implemented it, the alternative being trying to re-enter the corrupt EU at enormous cost. What a mess.

We just need a right wing government that believes in the country.

It can still be done properly. Just needs the balls to do things like leave the ECHR and close the borders.

We have the tools now we just need a government who wishes to use them.

BritManToo Star Member

BritManToo

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, animalmagic said:

Thank you for that clarification, I really didn't know.

But you are all for democratic processes that deliver the result you desire, and then not permitting another democratic process should the people change their minds at a later date due to better insight and greater understanding?

Brexit hasn't been implimented though.

Project fear removed all the benefits of being in the EU, but kept all the rules Brexit was supposed to remove.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, animalmagic said:

Thank you for that clarification, I really didn't know.

But you are all for democratic processes that deliver the result you desire, and then not permitting another democratic process should the people change their minds at a later date due to better insight and greater understanding?

Deliberately false.

If a government is elected on a mandate to run a rejoin referendum and then the people vote rejoin in that referendum then I would accept that even though I would dislike the result.

Its called respecting the democratic process.

It's a shame so many remainers lack the maturity to do so.

Thingamabob Diamond Member

Thingamabob

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

We just need a right wing government that believes in the country.

It can still be done properly. Just needs the balls to do things like leave the ECHR and close the borders.

We have the tools now we just need a government who wishes to use them.

Agreed plus, in my opinion, the need to get a grip on energy policy by exploiting to the full Britain's oil and gas reserves.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Brexit hasn't been implimented though.

Project fear removed all the benefits of being in the EU, but kept all the rules Brexit was supposed to remove.

They deliberately botched it so they could say "look it didnt work".

That's how treacherous they are.

animalmagic Gold Member

animalmagic

Advanced Member
15 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Deliberately false.

If a government is elected on a mandate to run a rejoin referendum and then the people vote rejoin in that referendum then I would accept that even though I would dislike the result.

Its called respecting the democratic process.

It's a shame so many remainers lack the maturity to do so.

I totally agree with your point on accepting a democratic mandate and then accepting the result.

Purdey Diamond Member

Purdey

Advanced Member

Britain bored against remaining in the EU because they were told that it could trade with other countries. Australia and India for instance. Except they didn't make up for the losses in the EU.

They were promised that millions would be paid into the NHS which never happened.

I think that when politicians promise something will be done and a positive outcome will be achieved, no one man blame voters of they have buyers regret and want to return to a period they were at least familiar with.

boloaf Senior Member

boloaf

Member
4 hours ago, Tyke said:

Farage and johnson were largely responsible for degrading the UK's economy, border security and world standing. Reform would do even more damage. Farage, reform and restore are toxic.

It only divides Britain on the Remain side, they haven't stopped whinging since they lost the vote even though we've never properly left. It's only left wingers and Tory wets who want to remain and the reason is obvious, the EC is a huge socialist edifice under the control of a central unelected body. A globalist's wet dream.

Palatus Senior Member

Palatus

Member
4 hours ago, JonnyF said:

We are talking about Brexit not Starmer becoming PM.

So was I, leaving you with deflection as your only defense.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, Palatus said:

So was I, leaving you with deflection as your only defense.

We knew exactly what were were voting for.

Unlike Labour voters.

retayl Advanced Member

retayl

Member
5 hours ago, JonnyF said:

We are talking about Brexit not Starmer becoming PM.

Is your SDS going to be replaced by BDS?

retayl Advanced Member

retayl

Member

I voted for brexit! Part of my rationale being the belief that UK should move closer to the US as an ally. That direction of travel has been comprehensively trashed by Trump and to a lesser extent Biden (who was no friend of the UK). With the US no longer a country that can be plausibly trusted I see no alternative than to realign with Europe.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Brits now have the worst of two undesirable alternatives. They are living in a country that has declared Brexit but has not implemented it, the alternative being trying to re-enter the corrupt EU at enormous cost. What a mess.

What would have been the real implementation of Brexit?

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member

The old chestnut about, 'Brexit hasn't really been implemented/ done correctly', is getting a good airing here.

Truth - and problem - is that when challenged to explain and expand on what they mean, those espousing this view have little to no idea what the 'real Brexit' should look like.

I'll concede that there is, at least, one exception to this accusation:@JonnyF seems to believe that all laws which originated from the EU are bad laws and would remove them all from the UK stature book. Yep, that'll work🤦

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
24 minutes ago, retayl said:

Is your SDS going to be replaced by BDS?

I'll let you know if he actually comes out and tells us what he stands for and what he plans to do as PM.

So far he's a pair of glasses on a blank face.

Thingamabob Diamond Member

Thingamabob

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, candide said:

What would have been the real implementation of Brexit?

Just for openers repeal remaining retained EU laws, negotiate independent trade agreements world wide, and vastly improve border controls.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
39 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Just for openers repeal remaining retained EU laws, negotiate independent trade agreements world wide, and vastly improve border controls.

Why would just repealing retained EU laws improve UK's situation by miracle? In particular without a clear policy for the new laws. According to which policy or model would they be replaced by other laws? A more liberal economics model a la Chicago boys, with less taxes, lower social budget and less worker protections? A less environment friendly model? Reduced safety and health criteria?

Since Brexit, the UK is already free to negotiate its own trade agreements. It brought peanuts (as expected).

Control borders? Fine. How?

retayl Advanced Member

retayl

Member
5 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Just for openers repeal remaining retained EU laws, negotiate independent trade agreements world wide, and vastly improve border controls.

and comprehensively destroy all trade agreements with our biggest trading partner! Sounds like “the Art of the Deal”

Palatus Senior Member

Palatus

Member
19 hours ago, JonnyF said:

We knew exactly what were were voting for.

10 years later, has it finally sunk in what you voted for?

Thingamabob Diamond Member

Thingamabob

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, retayl said:

and comprehensively destroy all trade agreements with our biggest trading partner! Sounds like “the Art of the Deal”

14 hours ago, candide said:

Why would just repealing retained EU laws improve UK's situation by miracle? In particular without a clear policy for the new laws. According to which policy or model would they be replaced by other laws? A more liberal economics model a la Chicago boys, with less taxes, lower social budget and less worker protections? A less environment friendly model? Reduced safety and health criteria?

Since Brexit, the UK is already free to negotiate its own trade agreements. It brought peanuts (as expected).

Control borders? Fine. How?

Certainly less taxes, a lower social/welfare budget, a sensible environmental budget which allows for the full exploitation of Britain's domestic oil and natural gas resources, and the employment of experienced, skilled negotiators to handle trade agreements.

Eric Loh Star Member

Eric Loh

Advanced Member
9 minutes ago, Thingamabob said:

Certainly less taxes, a lower social/welfare budget, a sensible environmental budget which allows for the full exploitation of Britain's domestic oil and natural gas resources, and the employment of experienced, skilled negotiators to handle trade agreements.

But but was the UK economy better or worse after Brexit.

Economic analyses show that the UK economy was stronger and on a higher growth trajectory before Brexit. Most estimates indicate that Brexit has made the UK economy 6% to 8% smaller than it would have been if the country had remained in the European Union.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Palatus said:

10 years later, has it finally sunk in what you voted for?

Of course.

It's a shame it wasn't implemented properly but like I said that was deliberate.

Maybe when Reform get in?

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Certainly less taxes, a lower social/welfare budget, a sensible environmental budget which allows for the full exploitation of Britain's domestic oil and natural gas resources, and the employment of experienced, skilled negotiators to handle trade agreements.

That's very general and largely unrelated to Brexit. It sounds like manage the country a little bit better (which can certainly be done). Nothing prevented any government from lowering taxes or welfare budget before Brexit, apart from import tariffs. Do you advocate for lowering current import tariffs?

Moreover, in order to make a difference, the low tax/low welfare should be significant. Do you think people living in the North, who voted Brexit because they had been left behind by the guys in the City, would approve a liberal economics policy? The type of policy which will make them easier to get fired, and reduce the amount of welfare they get, while the guys working for the 'City' will make even more money than before?

Finally, '"better negotiators" is just wishful thinking. There is no reason why a middle economic power could get better deals than a large economic power such as the EU.

RayC Ruby Member

RayC

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Of course.

It's a shame it wasn't implemented properly but like I said that was deliberate.

Maybe when Reform get in?

Rinse and repeat.

In a previous thread, you agreed with my (sarcastic) suggestion that a 'proper Brexit implementation' would have entailed removing all EU laws from the UK statute book.

What could have possibly gone wrong.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.