Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.
ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

World News

Fresh news brought to you daily from around the world. Hot news, breaking stories as they happen.

Search Andrews Files - survivor pleads

Juliette Bryant demands transparency from the Royals.
Juliette Bryant, who suffered abuse at the hands of Jeffrey Epstein, has called on Buckingham Palace to uncover files relating to Prince Andrew's relationship with the disgraced financier. Bryant, speaking from Cape Town, praised the King's recent pledge to support police investigations but demanded concrete actions over empty statements.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Bryant, who never met Andrew nor accused him, insists it's time for the Royal Family to lead a thorough examination of Andrew's correspondence with Epstein. "They need to go through all Prince Andrew's files and emails," she told the BBC, highlighting the contrast with how her information was previously scrutinised by authorities.

Recent releases from the US Department of Justice have intensified the spotlight. Over three million files included photos of Andrew in compromising positions and suggested he shared confidential state secrets with Epstein during his tenure as trade envoy.

Bryant, a former model, described meeting Epstein in 2002 and enduring repeated abuse on his notorious island and ranch. She expressed hope that authorities will assess Andrew's connections to Epstein thoroughly. "If they have nothing to hide, they should release the information," she asserted.

Epstein operated with impunity due to his manipulative nature, Bryant recalled, branding him a "mastermind criminal." She also condemned Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's accomplice, who remains jailed for sex trafficking. Bryant stressed Maxwell’s role in her abuse and opposed any potential clemency for her.

Maxwell, present during the abuses, declined to testify at a recent US congressional hearing. Bryant remembered Maxwell as intimidating and central to the criminal operations, portraying her fear and powerlessness during those harrowing times.

Royal reactions remain cautious, while Bryant and other victims anticipate meaningful steps. As Andrew maintains his innocence, royal and legal bodies face mounting pressure for transparency. The call for open investigation serves as a stark reminder of victims seeking justice and accountability.

Key Takeaways
Bryant urges Palace to investigate Andrew's Epstein ties.
Released files show Andrew sharing secrets with Epstein.
Bryant condemns Maxwell’s role and opposes her clemency.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 12 Feb 2026
CharlieH
CharlieH

PM Demands Ratcliffe Apology for "Colonised by Immigrants" remarks

Sir Jim Ratcliffe's comments outraged UK politics.
Billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe, co-owner of Manchester United, sparked a political storm with his inflammatory remarks on immigration. He claimed the UK was "colonised by immigrants" and criticised the PM for not taking tough economic measures. Labour's Sir Keir Starmer, alongside No 10, swiftly slammed these comments as "offensive and wrong," demanding an apology.

Get the latest headlines in your email

The controversy erupted following Sir Jim's Sky News interview, where he voiced concerns about the UK's population growth. He suggested that the Prime Minister lacked the resolve to stabilise the economy by making "difficult decisions." The backlash was immediate.

Critics argue Sir Jim's statements fuel divisiveness. "Play into the hands of those who want to divide," warned a No 10 spokesperson. Manchester United fans groups, including the Supporters Trust and Muslim Supporters Club, expressed deep concern. They insisted such remarks should unite, not alienate, supporters.

Football organisations also condemned the billionaire. Show Racism the Red Card and Kick It Out emphasised the need for unity. The 1958 Group criticised Sir Jim for commenting from a tax haven. "Ill-advised," they branded his words, highlighting his Monaco residence to avoid UK taxes.

Sir Jim, however, remains steadfast in his stance. Drawing a parallel to his tough decisions at Manchester United, he argued that addressing major national issues demands courage and unpopularity. Since acquiring 27.7% of the club, he made sweeping changes, including sacking two managers and making hundreds redundant.

The billionaire, with a net worth of £17bn, met Reform UK leader Nigel Farage recently. He described Farage as “intelligent,” sparking further debate. Farage backed Sir Jim's concerns about immigration, challenging Labour's stance.

Prominent political figures joined the fray. Sir Ed Davey insisted the remarks were "out of step with British values" and urged Sir Jim to apologise. Meanwhile, information from the Office for National Statistics contradicted Sir Jim's claims, estimating the UK's population slightly lower.

Sir Jim's multi-faceted empire, INEOS, known for everything from chemicals to luxury brands, remains under scrutiny. Yet, his controversial statements have placed him at the centre of a heated national discussion.

Key Takeaways
Ratcliffe claimed the UK was "colonised by immigrants."
Political leaders and fan groups demand an apology.
ONS data contradicts Ratcliffe's population claims.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 12 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Iran's Revolution Anniversary Overshadowed by Unrest and Discontent

The 47th anniversary of Iran's revolution was marked by a blend of celebration and underlying unrest. In Tehran, a vibrant display of fireworks lit up the night sky, accompanied by chants of "God is greatest" from rooftops. Yet, amid these celebrations were cries of "death to the dictator," indicative of deep-rooted societal divisions and recent widespread protests.
Get the latest headlines in your email

Last month's protests erupted over skyrocketing prices and calls to end clerical rule, encountering unprecedented lethal force. This has left a dark shadow over the usual festivities. The mood now contrasts sharply with previous visits, as economic hardships and political tensions heighten public dissatisfaction.

The streets of Tehran were awash with government loyalists, waving flags and chanting anti-American and anti-Israel slogans. On the surface, these public displays reflect allegiance to the current regime. However, the undercurrent is one of frustration—residents are grappling with economic pressures and political constraints.

During the celebrations, Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian addressed a crowd in Azadi Square, attributing the unrest to foreign "malicious propaganda." He acknowledged the government's shortcomings, particularly regarding economic management, and expressed a willingness to listen to public grievances. Despite these conciliatory gestures, real power lies with the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who has vowed no leniency for those deemed troublemakers.

Conversations with Tehran locals reveal a populace burdened by economic woes. Many struggle with high unemployment, skyrocketing costs of basic goods, and the lingering impacts of international sanctions. Emotions are raw and frustrations palpable, as demonstrated by Raha, a 32-year-old who broke into tears discussing her hardships. "Why should I be so ravished and depressed?" she lamented, reflecting widespread despair.

Dori, a 20-year-old who has stopped wearing the mandatory headscarf, described last month as "terrible." After witnessing graphic images of violence upon the restoration of internet access, she expressed heartbreak over the attacks on her fellow citizens. For people like Dori, the government's narrative of blaming foreign influence is unconvincing.

The public sentiment was captured by Akhtar, a 62-year-old concerned about escalating living costs and the high price of food. Her worries are echoed by many who express a desire for their voices to be heard by the government. Amir, a young Iranian, emphasized the need for basic needs and freedoms, a call resonating throughout the country.

Despite government assurances of addressing economic issues, the challenges are deeply tied to decades of sanctions and internal governance struggles. The nation's leadership faces mounting pressure to manage citizen demands while navigating external threats, including warnings from the US of potential military action if diplomatic talks fail.

As the Islamic Republic of Iran stands at this crossroads, confronting its most serious challenges since the historic revolution almost fifty years ago, its future direction remains uncertain. Citizens and officials alike are keenly aware that how these social and economic tensions are managed will define the nation's trajectory in the coming years.

The anniversary, usually a time of national unity and pride, has instead highlighted the fractures within Iranian society. As international observers watch closely, the country's ability to reconcile internal discord with external pressures will be crucial in sustaining its stability.

Key Takeaways:
Iran's revolution anniversary marred by recent unrest and economic hardship.
Leadership faces increased pressure to address citizen grievances.
Future stability hinges on balancing internal challenges and external threats.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 12 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

The Challenge of Ghost Ships in the English Channel

The issue of "ghost ships" in the English Channel has become a glaring concern. On 26 January, an email from a crew member aboard a tanker near Singapore revealed complaints about unpaid wages and mistreatment. The tanker, sailing under the name Beeta, was identified as the sanctioned American vessel Gale, implicating it in a broader problem of shadow fleets operating outside maritime regulations.

Get the latest headlines in your email


The shadow fleet, comprising tankers transporting Russian and Iranian oil, has grown rapidly. Currently, it includes around 1,468 vessels, nearly triple its size following Russia’s 2019 invasion of Ukraine. These ships represent about 18-19% of the global tanker fleet and carry 17% of all seaborne crude oil.

These vessels, often called "ghost" or "zombie" ships, manipulate identification systems to evade detection. They frequently shut off their Automatic Identification Systems (AIS), making them difficult to track. Many of these ships are poorly maintained and use tactics like changing names, flags, and fake insurance to hide their true identities.

Denis, a Russian engineer, recounted his experience aboard a sanctioned tanker, Serena, revealing the poor conditions and deceptive practices common on these ships. He described damaged equipment and fraudulent inspection certifications, highlighting the perils faced by crew members. The lack of transparency around vessel ownership compounds these problems, making it challenging to address grievances or secure fair treatment for seafarers.

Zombie ships like the Gale illustrate the extreme measures taken to operate under sanctions. After being sanctioned, these ships disappear and reemerge with stolen identities and faked locations, as evidenced by technology onboard allowing them to spoof positions.

The broader geopolitical implications of these operations are significant. The trade of sanctioned oil contributes to international conflicts, prompting Western governments to seek solutions. The US's recent approach in Venezuela, seizing tankers to pressure President Nicolás Maduro's regime, underscores one method of dealing with these rogue vessels. This involved military operations to capture ships like Marinera, previously known as Bella 1, despite risks of international confrontation.

In Europe, there are signs of a shift towards more assertive actions against shadow vessels. France and the UK have engaged in operations to seize Russian-linked tankers, reflecting a growing willingness to intervene. However, the logistics of maintaining seized ships and dealing with their cargoes pose substantial challenges. Holding these tankers, especially older and environmentally risky ones, requires substantial resources and poses legal and ethical dilemmas.

The international effort has largely focused on bureaucratic measures, including sanctioning vessels and tightening regulations in countries that flag these ships. The European Commission has introduced rules necessitating proof of insurance for vessels entering EU waters. However, shadow fleet ships often evade such measures or alter courses when challenged.

Ultimately, the increasing number of ghost ships strains global resources and challenges maritime security. With suspicions of these vessels being involved in undersea cable sabotage or surveillance, national security concerns add urgency to addressing the problem. The coordinated warning issued by the UK and other Baltic and North Sea nations about AIS manipulation highlights the growing threat to maritime safety.

In conclusion, the issue of ghost ships in the English Channel requires a multifaceted approach, combining regulatory oversight, international cooperation, and potentially assertive actions. As the shadow fleet continues to grow, the need for vigilance and innovation in maritime policy becomes increasingly critical to ensure both maritime and national security.

Key Takeaways:
Shadow fleets evade sanctions by using deceptive practices.
Growing international effort to regulate and intercept these vessels.
National security concerns drive urgency for solutions.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 12 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Key Points from Pam Bondi's Fiery Testimony on Epstein Files

US Attorney General Pam Bondi faced intense scrutiny during a congressional hearing on the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. As tensions flared, Bondi defended the Justice Department amidst pointed questions and partisan clashes.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Epstein Victims Watch as Bondi Defends Redactions
Epstein victims attended the hearing, prompting lawmakers to focus on how the Justice Department handled file releases. Bondi expressed regret over the abuse victims suffered but faced criticism for failing to redact victims' names as required. Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal highlighted instances where "nude images" of survivors were improperly released, prompting all victims present to stand in solidarity. Bondi labeled Jayapal's approach as "theatrics" and insisted officials acted swiftly to rectify inadvertent releases.

2. Republicans Join In Over Epstein Complaints
The heated discussion included bipartisan dissatisfaction with redacted names in the Epstein files. Lawmakers pressed Bondi on accountability for the redactions, questioning why certain figures, such as billionaire Les Wexner, were initially protected. Republican Thomas Massie described the situation as "bigger than Watergate," prompting Bondi to call the issue a "political joke." FBI Director Kash Patel noted a lack of evidence tying Wexner to trafficking, reinforcing his role as a source of information instead.

3. Lawmaker Asks About Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor
California Representative Ted Lieu introduced a photo from the Epstein files depicting Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, raising questions about why it hadn't led to prosecution. The context of the images remains unclear, with Bondi suggesting Lieu address such concerns to former Attorney General Merrick Garland. Lieu criticized Garland's handling of the matter, agreeing that opportunities were missed.

4. Democrats Push for Minneapolis Investigation
Beyond the Epstein files, Bondi was challenged over federal immigration agents' actions in Minneapolis, where shootings sparked nationwide protests. Representative Steve Cohen described the incidents as "executions" warranting investigation. Bondi defended federal actions, blaming tensions on officials who obstructed law enforcement. Republicans, including committee chair Jim Jordan, supported Bondi's stance while highlighting her role in enforcing immigration policies.

Key Takeaways:
Bondi faced backlash for redaction issues in Epstein files.
Bipartisan dissatisfaction emerged over protected names.
Lieu questioned the lack of action on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.
Minneapolis shootings added to the hearing's contentious topics.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 12 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Suspect Identified in Deadly Canada School Shooting

Canadian police have identified the suspect behind a mass shooting that left eight dead and several wounded in northeast British Columbia. The tragedy unfolded at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School and a local home, with the suspect, an 18-year-old local resident, found dead from a self-inflicted injury. Investigations into the motive are ongoing.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Six victims were tragically killed at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School, marking the deadliest school shooting in Canada in decades. Among the victims were several students and a teacher. Two additional victims, identified as the suspect’s relatives, were discovered at a residence in the small town of 2,400 people. Authorities initially reported a higher death toll but later confirmed one injured victim survived.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney conveyed his condolences to the Tumbler Ridge community, stating, "the nation mourns with you." Mass shootings are notably rare in Canada, which enforces stricter gun control laws compared to the US.
As the investigation progresses, the focus remains on understanding the reasons behind this devastating event and providing support to those affected in the tight-knit community. Authorities continue to gather information and urge anyone with insights into the suspect’s background or possible motive to come forward.
The incident has reignited discussions on gun control and the need for comprehensive measures to prevent such tragedies. As Canada grapples with the shock of this event, the authorities emphasize the importance of community resilience and unity in healing and moving forward.
Key Takeaways:
An 18-year-old suspect identified in Canada's deadliest school shooting in decades.
Eight victims, including students, a teacher, and relatives, confirmed.
Prime Minister Carney extends national condolences and solidarity.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 12 Feb 2026


ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Shot his daughter after arguing about Trump

British Woman's Death in Texas Linked to Trump Argument
Lucy Harrison, a 23-year-old British woman from Warrington, Cheshire, was shot dead by her father while visiting him in Texas. An inquest revealed that the father-daughter duo had argued about then-President Donald Trump earlier that day. The incident occurred in Prosper, near Dallas, on 10 January 2025.

Get the latest headlines in your email

Harrison’s father, Kris Harrison, had moved to the US when Lucy was a child. Despite the police investigating her death as possible manslaughter, no criminal charges were brought against Kris after a grand jury in Collin County decided not to indict him.
At the Cheshire Coroner's Court inquest, Lucy’s boyfriend, Sam Littler, provided insights into the "big argument" they had about Trump. Lucy often became upset about her father's gun ownership and previous alcohol issues, which came to a head during their visit.
Kris Harrison admitted in a statement that he relapsed on the day of the shooting, consuming around 500ml of white wine. On that fateful morning, Lucy questioned her father’s reaction if she were a victim of sexual assault, to which he responded indifferently, upsetting her further.
Before they were due to leave for the airport, Kris took Lucy to his bedroom to show her a Glock 9mm handgun he kept for "security." According to Kris, the gun accidentally discharged as he lifted it, striking Lucy fatally. He claimed he couldn't remember if his finger was on the trigger.
Luciana Escalera, a police officer, noted the smell of alcohol on Kris’s breath after the shooting, and CCTV footage confirmed his purchase of wine earlier that day.
Kris’s attorney, Ana Samuel, argued for the coroner to recuse herself due to alleged bias, but the request was denied. Lucy’s mother, Jane Coates, described her daughter as a "force of life," passionate about important issues and debates.
The inquest has been adjourned, with the coroner’s conclusions expected shortly. Lucy’s tragic death has highlighted the emotional and complex family dynamics surrounding gun ownership and political disagreements.
Key Takeaways:
Lucy Harrison was fatally shot by her father after a political dispute.
The accident involved Kris showing Lucy his handgun, which discharged.
No criminal charges were filed as a grand jury declined to indict.

Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 11 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

At least seven dead after school shooting in British Columbia, Canada, police say

BREAKING STORY !

Summary
At least seven people have been killed in a shooting at a school in British Columbia, Canada, police say
Six people were found dead inside Tumbler Ridge Secondary School, while a seventh died on the way to hospital
An individual believed to be the shooter was also found deceased with what appears to be a self‑inflicted injury, according to officials
Another two people were found dead at a separate location, which police believe was connected to the incident

'The scene was very dramatic', police chief says
RCMP Chief Supt Ken Floyd says it is too early to say whether the death toll will rise.
The roughly 25 people who suffered non-life-threatening injuries are still being assessed by medical professionals, he says.
"The scene was very dramatic and there were multiple victims that are still being cared for," he says.

developing story


Join the discussion?

Already a member?



  Adapted by ASEAN Now · Source · 11 Feb 2026
ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Russia could invade to protect nuclear assets ?

Norwegian Defence Chief Highlights Potential Russian Threats
General Eirik Kristoffersen, Norway's chief of defence, has issued a stark warning about the possibility of a Russian invasion aimed at protecting nuclear assets in the far north. While Russia does not show conquest ambitions akin to those in Ukraine, its nuclear arsenal on the Kola Peninsula, near the Norwegian border, presents a strategic vulnerability.

Kristoffersen outlined the importance of these nuclear resources, suggesting their protection could lead to aggressive actions by Moscow. "We don’t take that off the table," he stated, referencing scenarios where Russia might act to safeguard its second-strike capabilities. This highlights the broader strategic calculations that shape tensions in the region.

In a comprehensive interview with the Guardian, Kristoffersen also criticized remarks made by former U.S. President Donald Trump concerning Greenland. He dismissed Trump’s assertions about allied roles in Afghanistan and emphasized Norway's significant contributions, including frontline missions and substantial sacrifices.

The geopolitical landscape has shifted significantly, especially with Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Norway has responded by bolstering its defenses and strengthening alliances with Sweden and Finland, who have joined NATO. Kristoffersen stressed the dual nature of the threats, combining traditional military risks with modern hybrid tactics.

Despite these challenges, Norway maintains open lines of communication with Russia, particularly regarding search and rescue missions in the Barents Sea. Kristoffersen has advocated for a military hotline between the nations to avoid accidental escalations, noting that recent airspace violations were likely due to pilot inexperience rather than intentional aggression.

Regarding the Svalbard archipelago, Kristoffersen confirmed Norway's adherence to the 1920 treaty prohibiting its militarization. He dismissed Russian accusations of stealth militarisation as unfounded, asserting that Moscow does not genuinely believe in these claims, but uses them for propaganda purposes.

Addressing Trump’s broader comments on Greenland, Kristoffersen found the claims of military designs by China and Russia "very strange." He reinforced that Norway’s intelligence services have a comprehensive view of Arctic activities, focusing on traditional Russian operations rather than new threats in Greenland.

French President Emmanuel Macron has added to the dialogue, urging European nations to stand firm against intimidation and strategic pressures. Macron described a "Greenland moment," warning that perceived threats could lead to increased dependency without proper resistance.

Kristoffersen’s insights underline the complexities involved in maintaining Arctic security, particularly given the growing geopolitical tensions. By advocating for preparedness, strong alliances, and channels of communication, Norway seeks to manage these challenges while preventing unnecessary escalations.

As the Arctic continues to be a focal point of strategic interest, the role of nations like Norway, with its balanced approach of resilience and diplomacy, becomes crucial. The broader international community watches closely, recognizing that developments in this region have significant implications for global stability.

Key Takeaways:
Norway warns of potential Russian moves to protect nuclear assets.
Emphasis on strong NATO alliances and Arctic security preparedness.
Open communication with Russia crucial in managing tensions.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Islamists are 'embedded' in UK education and police

Farage Warns of Islamist Influence in UK Institutions
Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, has raised concerns about Islamist influence within British society, claiming that Islamists are "embedded" in the nation's education, politics, and police. He delivered this warning during the launch of his party's Jewish Alliance.

Farage stated that senior intelligence sources informed him about the deep infiltration of the Muslim Brotherhood, a Sunni Islamist organization, into various UK structures. Emphasizing the education system, political sphere, and police force, he noted the spreading influence as a significant threat to national stability.

Highlighting "rife and rampant sectarianism," Farage criticized the lack of action against the Brotherhood, contrasting it with certain Arab countries that have banned the group, designating it a terrorist organization. Farage believes this inaction mirrors a broader reluctance to confront security challenges.

His concerns resonate with recent US actions, where the government moved to potentially designate parts of the Muslim Brotherhood as foreign terrorist organizations. US officials cited the Brotherhood's engagement in violence and destabilization across the Middle East, noting threats to American and allied interests.

The US highlighted specific incidents, such as the Brotherhood's involvement in attacks following the events of October 7, 2023, in Israel. According to officials, chapters in Lebanon, Jordan, and Egypt have aligned with militant groups like Hamas and Hezbollah, escalating regional tensions.

Farage's warnings at the Jewish Alliance event were echoed by international concerns regarding the Brotherhood's activities. He pointed out the urgency of addressing embedded threats to protect national security.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has acknowledged the potential threat, stating to Jewish News that the Government is keeping the Muslim Brotherhood under "very close review." This statement indicates a level of governmental awareness and monitoring of the organization's influence within the UK.

Farage's remarks aim to spotlight the importance of proactive measures to safeguard British institutions from foreign influence. By invoking international examples, he underscores the need for vigilance and decisive action.

Key Takeaways:
Farage claims Islamists are embedded in UK institutions.
Aligns with US scrutiny of the Muslim Brotherhood.
UK Government monitoring the Brotherhood's influence.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Farage Warns of Gated Future for British Jews

Farage Warns of Gated Future for British Jews
Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, has issued a warning that British Jews may soon need to live in "gated communities." At his party's Jewish Alliance launch, Farage shared his observations from Strasbourg during his MEP tenure, where Jewish communities faced significant security threats.

Farage recounted passing a Jewish school in Strasbourg where children, aged four or five, were escorted by armed soldiers. He highlighted similar situations in Brussels, noting that successful Jewish residents often reside in gated communities with 24-hour security. "I'm afraid, on the current path, that is the future for the British Jewish community," Farage stated, underscoring his concerns for their safety.

While Farage insisted he is not advocating for "special rights," he emphasized the urgent need for increased protection due to "a direct threat" against British Jews. His remarks highlighted a trend he's observed, urging action to prevent similar circumstances in the UK.

Robert Jenrick also addressed the event, condemning "hate marches" by pro-Palestine protesters as assaults on national unity. His comments aligned with Farage's, promoting a vision of a cohesive, multi-faith, and multi-ethnic Britain.

Despite facing criticism for previous comments about multiculturalism in Birmingham, Jenrick reiterated the importance of tackling antisemitism and ensuring Jewish security. He stressed that the Reform UK party is committed to safeguarding all communities under "one flag."

The event featured speeches from notable figures including Suella Braverman and Richard Tice, who joined in expressing firm support for protecting Jewish life in the UK. Attendees described the launch as a powerful gathering focused on confronting sectarianism and promoting safety for all.

The party's stance reflects a broader effort to address and combat antisemitic threats while fostering an integrated society. Farage's call to action highlights the need for vigilance and proactive measures to ensure the safety and integration of Jewish communities across the UK.

Key Takeaways:
Nigel Farage warns of potential security challenges for British Jews.
Robert Jenrick emphasizes unity in facing antisemitic threats.
Reform UK reinforces the need to protect Jewish communities.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

French Ex-Teacher Charged with Abuse of 89 Teens

Worldwide abuse case spans decades and multiple countries.
Jacques Leveugle, a 79-year-old former French teacher, has been charged with the rape and sexual assault of 89 teenagers, with allegations dating back to the 1960s. The charges emerged after his nephew discovered a USB drive containing detailed accounts of his offences.

The Grenoble prosecutor, Etienne Manteaux, revealed the disturbing breadth of the case, with crimes allegedly committed across France, Germany, Switzerland, Morocco, Niger, Algeria, the Philippines, India, Colombia, and New Caledonia. Leveugle allegedly used his position as an informal teacher at holiday camps to perpetrate these crimes.

Authorities made the rare decision to name Leveugle publicly, hoping unknown victims will come forward, as only about 40 have been identified so far. “If victims wish to come forward, now is the time,” urged Manteaux.

Leveugle was arrested in 2024, while residing in Morocco. His arrest followed his nephew's discovery of incriminating material on the USB, which allegedly contained extensive documentation of his sexual relations with minors.

The timeline of Leveugle’s movements, dating back to 1967, shows a pattern of travel and alleged abuse in multiple countries. He reportedly exploited his role as a tutor to engage with young people, leading to the charges he now faces.

Shockingly, Leveugle also confessed to killing his mother and aunt, claiming he smothered them with cushions during their terminal illnesses in 1974 and 1992. A separate investigation has been launched into these alleged murders.

Despite the statute of limitations covering alleged assaults before 1993, Manteaux stressed the importance of understanding the extent of Leveugle's actions. The detailed records found could be key in piecing together the full scope of his crimes.

This case draws parallels to other high-profile cases in France, where meticulous records kept by offenders have been instrumental in securing convictions. Such documentation has previously led to 20-year sentences in cases like those of Dominique Pélicot and former doctor Joêl Le Scouarnec.

As the investigation continues, French authorities are determined to ensure justice is served, highlighting the significance of evidence in prosecuting historical abuse cases.

Key Takeaways:
Jacques Leveugle charged with abuse across decades and countries.
Authorities name suspect to encourage more victims to come forward.
Separate investigation into Leveugle's alleged familial murders.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Indonesia Prepares 8,000 Troops for Gaza Deployment

Indonesia leads international effort to stabilize Gaza.
Indonesia is gearing up to deploy up to 8,000 soldiers to Gaza as part of the second phase of a US-brokered ceasefire agreement. This marks Indonesia as the first country to commit troops to the International Stabilization Force (ISF).

General Maruli Simanjuntak, the army chief of staff, announced that training is underway, focusing on medical and engineering roles. This initiative is mandated by the UN Security Council to secure borders and demilitarize the area, including the disarmament of Hamas.

Indonesia's move follows its commitment to President Donald Trump’s Board of Peace, which aims to oversee post-war reconstruction and a new Palestinian government in Gaza. The board will meet for the first time in Washington on 19 February.

President Prabowo Subianto's decision has sparked criticism from some Islamic groups in Indonesia, amidst public backlash over US involvement in Gaza’s conflict. However, Prabowo stands firm, emphasizing Indonesia’s role as the world’s largest Muslim nation in pursuing a two-state solution.

Israel’s public broadcaster reported that an area between Rafah and Khan Younis in Gaza has been designated for an Indonesian military base. Although Turkey and Pakistan are considering similar moves, they have stressed their deployments would be strictly for peacekeeping, not disarming Hamas.

Despite these efforts, tensions remain high as Hamas refuses to disarm while Israel occupies parts of Gaza. This complicates the mission, as the situation on the ground is far from a stable peace.

Key Takeaways:
Indonesia to deploy troops under a US-brokered ceasefire agreement.
Tasks include securing borders and post-war reconstruction.
Regional tensions persist, impacting peacekeeping efforts.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Afghan Asylum Seeker Convicted for Raping 12-Year-Old

Ahmad Mulakhil found guilty; case prompts calls for policy change.
Ahmad Mulakhil, a 23-year-old Afghan asylum seeker, has been convicted at Warwick Crown Court for the horrific rape and abduction of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton. The shocking incident occurred on 22 July, when Mulakhil took the girl to a secluded area and committed brutal sexual offences, while also recording an indecent video of her.

During the trial, the victim bravely recounted her terrifying ordeal, explaining that Mulakhil laughed during the attack and ignored her pleas to stop. Prosecutor Daniel Oscroft condemned Mulakhil's attempts to shift blame onto the victim as "stomach-churning."

The conviction has sparked widespread public outrage, with protests erupting due to the initial lack of information on Mulakhil's nationality and immigration status. This has led to changes in guidance for reporting such details in high-profile cases.

Mulakhil, who arrived in the UK from France in March 2025, four months before the attack, now faces a substantial custodial sentence and deportation. His case has drawn criticism from political figures like Nigel Farage, who accused authorities of a "cover-up."

Warwickshire Police initially followed national guidelines that excluded sharing suspects’ ethnicity or immigration status. However, after public pressure, police forces have been encouraged to disclose such details in similar cases.

Mulakhil's co-defendant, Mohammad Kabir, was acquitted of charges related to the incident, including attempted child abduction. Following his acquittal, Kabir was released from custody.

The case has amplified debates over immigration policies. A Home Office spokesperson stated that efforts are underway to reform laws to prevent foreign criminals from exploiting UK laws, emphasizing new measures to tackle illegal migration.

The victim, praised for her courage, will carry the trauma of this crime for the rest of her life. Authorities continue to support and liaise with the Nuneaton community, acknowledging the deep impact this crime has had on local residents.

Key Takeaways:
Ahmad Mulakhil convicted for rape and abduction in Nuneaton.
Public outcry leads to changes in reporting suspect details.
Authorities focus on reforming immigration laws.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Keir Starmer's Leadership Under Scrutiny: What's Next?

Starmer navigates turbulent political waters, securing temporary stability.
Monday was a tumultuous day for Sir Keir Starmer as Prime Minister. Facing calls for resignation, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar almost delivered a decisive blow to his leadership. Yet, in a strategic comeback, Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy and other cabinet members swiftly rallied behind Starmer, showcasing a united front.

The dramatic events unfolded in a day filled with speculation and intrigue. Many believed Starmer might not survive the crisis, with even some Downing Street officials doubting his ability to continue. As tension escalated, Sarwar was poised in Glasgow, prepared to publicly call for Starmer’s resignation. However, Lammy's timely support, followed by a cascade of endorsements from ministers and MPs, shifted the tide.

For now, Starmer retains his position, but the stability of his leadership hangs in the balance. Future challenges loom large, with the May elections on the horizon and the critical Gorton and Denton by-election. These events could become defining moments for Starmer’s tenure, testing his political resilience and party loyalty.

The shadow of Wes Streeting, Health Secretary, and perceived leadership hopeful, looms over the political landscape. Streeting’s release of communications with Lord Mandelson without parliamentary approval fueled speculation about his ambitions, straining relations within the cabinet. Streeting maintains his support for Starmer, yet his actions hint at underlying tensions and potential rivalries.

Other potential leadership contenders in the Labour ranks include Angela Rayner, Shabana Mahmood, John Healey, and Ed Miliband. Despite murmurs of their candidacies, none seem ready to directly challenge Starmer’s authority at present.

The recent resignations within Starmer’s inner circle, including Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney, have added to the uncertainty. The departure of key figures weakens Starmer's team, making forthcoming appointments crucial for his leadership. Decisions about new staff could be pivotal, potentially redefining the direction and structure of his administration.

Starmer is also under increasing pressure to adapt his political agenda. Calls for a bolder, more left-wing approach are growing louder, reflecting dissatisfaction among some Labour MPs. His recent victories within the Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP), while significant, could be tested by future policy decisions and reforms, such as those related to the SEND system.

His ability to balance the diverse factions within his party while delivering on policy promises will be critical. The scepticism from some MPs suggests that any faltering in these efforts could reignite leadership debates.

As Starmer navigates these complexities, his focus remains on addressing key national issues and maintaining Labour's momentum. His speech at the PLP meeting emphasized his commitment to fight for the country he loves and to oppose the agendas posed by rival factions.

In conclusion, while Keir Starmer has weathered this immediate storm, the road ahead is fraught with challenges. Vigilant of internal and external pressures, his leadership will continually be tested. How he maneuvers through these turbulent waters will define not only his future but also the trajectory of the Labour Party in the approaching months.

Key Takeaways:
Starmer solidifies position with cabinet support amidst crisis.
Streeting's actions stir speculation about leadership ambitions.
Upcoming elections and policy challenges may impact stability.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Former police chief claims Trump flagged Epstein's behaviour in 2006.

Trump's Alleged Call About Epstein Surfaces in FBI Files
Explosive allegations have emerged from an FBI document detailing a call between Donald Trump and a former Florida police chief in 2006. The now-president reportedly told the chief, "everyone knows" about Jeffrey Epstein's actions, praising the police for investigating Epstein.

The unnamed police chief, believed to be Michael Reiter, claimed Trump informed him he had expelled Epstein from Mar-a-Lago, citing his "disgusting" reputation. He also alleged Trump labelled Ghislaine Maxwell as Epstein's "operative," warning to "focus on her."

These revelations may challenge Trump's longstanding denial of knowledge regarding Epstein’s crimes. In 2019, Trump claimed ignorance of Epstein’s misconduct, stating, "No, I had no idea."

While the Palm Beach police began probing Epstein for exploiting underage girls in 2006, the case was later handed to federal prosecutors. A controversial plea deal in 2008 shielded Epstein from severe charges.

According to the FBI, Trump reportedly distanced himself from Epstein upon seeing him with teenagers, saying he "got the hell out of there." Reiter asserted Trump was an early informant to police about Epstein.

However, Trump has maintained he severed ties with Epstein years before the arrest due to employment disputes. "He was fine, and then not too long after that, he did it again and I said 'outta here'," Trump stated about Epstein allegedly attempting to recruit Mar-a-Lago staff.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged the alleged call, aligning with Trump's narrative that he expelled Epstein for inappropriate behaviour.

Amidst the resurfacing of these allegations, Maxwell recently refused to testify before Congress about Epstein, invoking the Fifth Amendment. Her lawyer stated that Maxwell would "speak fully" if given clemency by Trump—a prospect Trump has denied considering.

The Justice Department has said there's no corroborating evidence of Trump's reported call, keeping the speculation alive about what the president knew and when.

Key Takeaways:
Trump allegedly called to alert police about Epstein in 2006.
FBI document raises questions about Trump's Epstein knowledge.
Maxwell remains silent, offering to speak if granted clemency.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.10
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Maxwell’s Silence - who is she protecting ?

Ghislaine Maxwell's refusal to testify before Congress draws backlash.
Ghislaine Maxwell chose silence over answers during a closed-door congressional deposition, invoking her Fifth Amendment right. This move has drawn sharp criticism, with Democratic Representative Robert Garcia questioning, “Who is she protecting?”

Garcia, part of the oversight committee pushing to release Jeffrey Epstein’s investigative files, slammed Maxwell for providing no information about Epstein's network. He accused the Trump administration of giving her special treatment in a low-security prison, alleging a White House cover-up.

Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year sentence for her involvement with Epstein, was advised by her attorney David Oscar Markus to remain silent. Markus stated that Maxwell's current habeas petition demonstrates her conviction was based on an unfair trial, hence her decision to invoke the Fifth.

According to Markus, Maxwell is willing to reveal everything if granted clemency by President Trump. "Only she can provide the complete account," he insisted, suggesting that both Trump and Clinton are innocent of any wrongdoing related to Epstein.

The White House, approached for comment, reiterated previous statements that pardoning Maxwell was not under consideration.

Ro Khanna, another Democratic representative, pointed out inconsistencies in Maxwell’s stance. Previously, she willingly engaged in an interview with Trump’s Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche without invoking her rights.

Maxwell answered all questions without hesitation during that meeting, said her lawyer. This shift from openness to silence raises questions about her motivations and potential protections.

Khanna had prepared pointed questions for Maxwell, seeking clarity on co-conspirators and secret settlements she once acknowledged. The Department of Justice claims no list of names exists, despite suspicions fueled by released documents and legal claims.

Maxwell’s silence has intensified demands for transparency amid ongoing investigations. As her lawyer suggests the truth could emerge with clemency, the political and legal drama surrounding Epstein's network continues unabated.

Key Takeaways:
Maxwell refused to testify, invoking her Fifth Amendment rights.
Her silence spurred allegations of a cover-up and raised questions.
Calls for transparency in Epstein's investigation intensify.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.09
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

UK, UN, and EU slam the "monumental injustice." over Jimmy Lai's 20-Year Sentence

UK, UN, and EU slam the "monumental injustice."
The global community has erupted in condemnation over the 20-year jail sentence handed to pro-democracy activist Jimmy Lai in Hong Kong. At 78, this harsh sentence is essentially a life term for Lai, a staunch critic of the Chinese government and founder of the Hong Kong newspaper, Apple Daily.

UK Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper expressed outrage, calling Lai's prosecution politically motivated. "For 78-year-old Jimmy Lai, 20 years is an effective life sentence," she stated, urging Hong Kong to end Lai’s ordeal and free him.

Sebastien Lai, Jimmy's son, voiced fears of his father dying alone, while the legal team declared Lai the world’s highest profile political prisoner. The UN rights chief, Volker Türk, also decried the verdict as contrary to international law, calling for its reversal.

Lai's sentence is the harshest under Hong Kong’s national security law, introduced by Beijing in response to pro-democracy protests. Critics argue the law suppresses dissent, while Beijing claims it's necessary for stability.

The EU joined the chorus of criticism, with spokesperson Anitta Hipper demanding Lai’s immediate release. "This outcome highlights the breadth of Hong Kong’s vague security law," she noted.

Since his 2020 arrest, Lai faced accusations of colluding with foreign forces. His son Sebastien revealed the sentence brought unexpected relief, marking the end of a “farce.”

In recent discussions with China’s President Xi Jinping, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer addressed Lai’s case. However, tangible progress remains unclear. The UK’s visa scheme expansion for Hongkongers juxtaposes Lai’s imprisonment, highlighting tense UK-China relations.

Meanwhile, Hong Kong and Chinese authorities defend the verdict. John Lee, Hong Kong’s chief executive, claimed Lai committed "heinous crimes," asserting justice was served. China’s foreign ministry spokesperson labeled Lai the "mastermind" of past unrest, defending the prosecution’s legitimacy.

Lai’s conviction underscores the high-stakes battle over media freedom and democracy in Hong Kong. As international pressure mounts, the focus remains on Beijing’s response and the potential impact on global diplomatic relations.

Key Takeaways:
Worldwide outcry over Jimmy Lai's sentence.
UK and global entities call for his release.
Hong Kong authorities defend their actions.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.09

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Deadly Cold Snap Claims 18 Lives in NYC

Sub-zero temperatures wreak havoc, leaving 18 dead in NYC.
New York City is reeling from an unprecedented cold snap, claiming 18 lives since late January. For 13 days, temperatures plunged to 0°C (32°F) or below, marking one of the longest icy stretches in decades. Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced the grim toll and urged residents to "stay safe, stay indoors."

The city faced arctic conditions, causing severe "wind chills" that risked hypothermia and frostbite. Despite a forecasted rise in temperatures, the mercury remains lower than usual for this time of year. The National Weather Service noted that highs should typically reach around 4°C.

Mayor Mamdani has been proactive since declaring a Code Blue emergency on 19 January. This declaration eased the intake procedures for homeless shelters, leading to about 1,400 placements. To further tackle the crisis, an additional 64 hotel rooms have been added to the city's shelter capacity, with 150 outreach workers deployed on the streets.

Tragically, at least 10 victims were discovered outdoors. The remaining circumstances surrounding the other deaths remain unclear. The city remains vigilant as warnings persist about potential dangers. Melting snow and ice could fall from buildings, while refrozen streets and pavements pose serious hazards.

Despite the challenges, efforts to keep New Yorkers safe are relentless. Mamdani emphasised their ongoing commitment, noting, "We will continue to hold their families in our thoughts and work tirelessly to protect our residents."

As New York battles the elements, Mamdani's call to "keep looking out for one another" resonates deeply. The extreme weather has united the city in grief and resolve, underscoring the need for community vigilance in the face of adversity.

Key Takeaways:
18 dead due to NYC's extreme cold spell.
Over 1,400 moved to shelters amid crisis.
Temperatures set to rise but remain below average.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.09
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Sir Keir Starmer fights to stay in No 10 as speculation grows.

Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has thrown a political grenade, urging Sir Keir Starmer to step down as Prime Minister. Sarwar held nothing back, declaring the Downing Street chaos as "not good enough" and citing "too many mistakes" at the top.

Yet Starmer isn’t backing down. Cabinet heavyweights rallied around him, flooding social media to show support. The Prime Minister, grappling with criticism over the appointment of Peter Mandelson as UK ambassador to the US, addressed a charged meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party. He declared, "I am not prepared to walk away from my mandate."

His defiant stance received applause, but tension simmers. Inside sources revealed MPs didn't hold back, with many firing tough questions at Starmer. Former Minister Justin Madders voiced his support for more of what he termed the PM’s "fighting spirit."

As Starmer spoke, Health Secretary Wes Streeting, seen as a potential leadership rival, published messages with Lord Mandelson. Streeting slammed government strategies and denied a close friendship with Mandelson, aiming to counter whispers of scandal.

Despite a standing ovation for the PM, scepticism lingers. Sarwar’s call for resignation comes amid mounting pressure over Mandelson’s appointment. Chief of Staff Morgan McSweeney resigned, owning "full responsibility" for the controversial decision.

Labour backbenchers and two senior advisers have followed suit, shaking No 10. Yet Sarwar maintains his allegiance is to Scotland amid looming elections, voicing dissatisfaction with the government’s broken promises.

The party remains divided. Starmer's leadership has been under scrutiny for months, but the row over Mandelson has intensified discussions. It’s a critical moment for Starmer, who’s expected to announce changes to his team in response to the resignations. Allies like Chancellor Rachel Reeves urge everyone to focus on their mandate, stressing that voters want results from this administration.

Meanwhile, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and Liberal Democrat deputy leader Daisy Cooper criticise Starmer's grip on power. They argue that the British public needs a government addressing the pressing issues of the day, not trapped in internal struggles.

In the aftermath, Sir Keir vowed to prove politics can be a force for good, despite the scandals. He addressed No 10 staff, urging them to repair public trust through tangible efforts. He paid tribute to McSweeney, highlighting his enduring loyalty, noting their successful campaign history and their vision for the Labour Party.

Critics within his party voice concerns about his leadership style, suggesting changes are needed to prevent a "boys' club" mentality. Polly Billington, vice chair of the Parliamentary Labour Party, calls for significant personnel changes to address these issues.

Starmer's place remains precarious as the public and political landscape watch closely. Will his determination be enough to silence the growing discontent, or is this just the beginning of the end for his leadership?

Key Takeaways:
Sarwar calls for PM Starmer’s resignation.
Cabinet ministers publicly back Starmer.
Resignations fuel leadership speculation.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.09
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Israeli Actions in West Bank Draw Global Condemnation

de facto annexation ?
Israel's recent actions in the West Bank have sparked significant international backlash. Announced by Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, these measures are seen by many as steps toward de facto annexation, potentially altering the region’s political landscape.

The new policies ease restrictions on land sales to Jewish settlers, removing long-standing prohibitions against direct purchases. This is coupled with the declassification of local land registry records, a move that Israel claims enhances transparency. However, critics, including several international bodies, argue these changes facilitate land appropriation and undermine Palestinian claims.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has described the measures as "dangerous," asserting they are an open attempt to legitimize settlement expansion and land confiscation. He has called on the United States and the UN Security Council to intervene immediately, framing the actions as a direct threat to Palestinian sovereignty.

The global response has been swift and strong. The UK has condemned the move, declaring it inconsistent with international law. Additionally, foreign ministers from countries such as Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia have warned that these actions could escalate regional conflict and represent illegal annexation efforts.

Within Israel, the NGO Peace Now expressed alarm, suggesting that the decision could dismantle the Palestinian Authority and facilitate extensive land appropriation. The organization accuses the Israeli government of breaking barriers and paving the way for significant land theft.

These developments precede Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's meeting with US President Donald Trump. While the Trump administration has previously advised against outright annexation, it has not actively curtailed Israel's rapid settlement expansion.

The situation complicates the peace process, originally outlined in the Oslo Accords. The West Bank, divided into Areas A, B, and C, is witnessing increased settlement activity. Currently, over 700,000 Israeli settlers reside in the West Bank and East Jerusalem.

Israel's cabinet recently approved plans for new settlements, including the contentious E1 project near Jerusalem, which threatens to geographically sever parts of the West Bank, making a contiguous Palestinian state more challenging.

The UN has reported record numbers of Israeli settler violence and significant Palestinian displacement in recent years. The Israeli government, which includes many pro-settler members, views the West Bank as integral to its history and identity, which further complicates the conflict.

An advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice has stated that Israel's occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal under international law. Despite this, Netanyahu remains opposed to the establishment of a Palestinian state, citing it as a potential security threat to Israel.

Land sales in the area are fraught, with transactions often involving middlemen. Such sales are considered treasonous by the Palestinian Authority and are technically punishable by death, though usually result in imprisonment.

Smotrich's plan also involves transferring licensing powers for construction in volatile areas like Hebron solely to Israeli authorities, heightening tensions in a region already steeped in religious and political significance. This includes the Cave of the Patriarchs, a site revered in Judaism and Islam.

The plan gives Israeli bodies oversight in environmental and archaeological matters in PA-administered areas and revives a committee to allow Israel to make proactive land purchases in the West Bank, consolidating land reserves for future settlement.

As Netanyahu, facing an election, seeks to appease pro-settler factions within his coalition, these moves may solidify his base but risk international censure. For Palestinians, the measures represent an existential threat to their national aspirations, fueling further unrest and confrontation.

Key Takeaways
Israel's new West Bank policies are seen as de facto annexation steps.
Global condemnation includes warnings of increased conflict risk.
Israeli settlement expansion complicates peace process efforts.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.09
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

King Charles Offers Palace Support in Epstein Inquiry

King Charles has intervened in the ongoing Epstein scandal, stating that Buckingham Palace is ready to assist police with their investigation into his brother, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. This comes as pressure mounts following new allegations against Andrew.

A Palace spokesperson emphasized the King's "profound concern" over the allegations. Thames Valley Police are currently assessing whether there are grounds to investigate a complaint from the anti-monarchy group Republic. The group claims Andrew is guilty of misconduct in public office and breaching official secrets.

Newly released emails from the Epstein files indicate Andrew may have passed on confidential information. These emails suggest that in late November 2010, Andrew forwarded reports of his visits to places like Singapore, Hong Kong, and Vietnam to Epstein just minutes after receiving them. He also allegedly shared confidential details about investment opportunities in Afghanistan in December 2010. Trade envoys are required to maintain the confidentiality of such sensitive information.

The Palace's statement underlined the King and Queen's continued sympathy for all victims of abuse. During a visit to Clitheroe, King Charles faced a heckler demanding to know his awareness of the allegations against Andrew. The crowd quickly silenced the man.

Pressure has increased with further claims linked to Epstein, including allegations that a second woman was sent to the UK for a sexual encounter with Andrew. Photographs from the files also appear to show Andrew in compromising positions.

Adding to the controversy, emails signed by his ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, reveal appeals for financial support from Epstein. Recently, Andrew was unexpectedly relocated from Royal Lodge in Windsor to Sandringham.

Back in October 2025, Andrew was stripped of his royal titles amid a previous wave of Epstein-related revelations. Despite the ongoing allegations, Andrew has consistently denied any wrongdoing, reminding the public that being named in the Epstein files does not imply guilt.

Key Takeaways
King Charles readies support for police concerning Andrew.
New evidence suggests Andrew shared confidential information.
Allegations continue to mount, increasing pressure on Andrew.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.09
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Outrage Over South Korean Official's Comment on 'Importing' Women

Expulsion follows uproar over birth-rate suggestion
A South Korean official, Kim Hee-soo, faced expulsion from the ruling Democratic Party after proposing "importing young women" from countries like Vietnam and Sri Lanka to boost birth rates. His comments, made during a town hall, sparked widespread anger and a diplomatic protest from Vietnam.

Kim suggested these women could marry young men in rural areas, as South Korea struggles with one of the world’s lowest birth rates. The statement was televised, leading to days of public outrage.

Despite issuing an apology, Kim's attempts to quell the backlash failed. He claimed his comment aimed to address population issues in rural regions but admitted it was "inappropriate."

South Jeolla Province publicly apologized, acknowledging the pain caused to Vietnamese people and women. The Vietnamese Embassy condemned the remarks as offensive to migrant women and minority groups.

The Democratic Party’s Supreme Council voted unanimously to expel Kim. Women and migrant rights activists plan to rally against his comments, highlighting ongoing tensions over values and attitudes towards minority groups.

Key Takeaways
South Korean official expelled over controversial remarks.
Comments sparked diplomatic protest from Vietnam.
Activists plan to rally in response to the remarks.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-01-31
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

US Sets June Deadline for Ukraine-Russia Peace

June ultimatum as energy strikes escalate war tension
The United States has set a June deadline for Ukraine and Russia to agree on ending the ongoing war, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced. As Russian attacks cripple key energy sectors, pressure mounts on both nations to reach an accord.

Zelenskyy revealed that the US plans to push both parties towards a summer resolution. He noted that the Trump administration is adamant about ending the conflict, proposing new talks in Miami next week. Ukraine has agreed to participate.

In negotiations, Russia presented a $12 trillion economic proposal dubbed the “Dmitriev package,” involving US economic agreements. However, the offer is clouded by Russia's continued strikes on Ukraine’s infrastructure.

Overnight, Russia launched more than 400 drones and 40 missiles targeting Ukraine's energy systems. Reports from Ukrenergo indicate this was the second major strike of the year, reducing output from nuclear plants and escalating nationwide power outages.

The latest US-driven deadline comes after earlier talks in Abu Dhabi stalled. Key issues remain unresolved, with Russia demanding Ukraine's retreat from Donbas—a position Kyiv firmly refuses. Zelenskyy stated, "We stand where we stand."

Managing the contested Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant is another unresolved issue. Zelenskyy expressed doubts about US suggestions to transform Donbas into a free economic zone as a compromise, citing differing perspectives on implementation.

During the latest talks, discussions centered on technically monitoring a ceasefire, with the US pledging involvement. Prior Russian strikes continue to disrupt Ukraine’s energy, resulting in widespread blackouts amid a harsh winter.

The US has proposed a truce focusing on energy infrastructure. While Ukraine is open to honoring such a ceasefire, Zelenskyy pointed out Russia's past violations of temporary pauses.

As the June deadline looms, both Ukraine and Russia face mounting international pressure to find common ground and end the destructive conflict.

Key Takeaways
June deadline set by US for Ukraine-Russia truce.
Russian strikes severely impact Ukraine's energy grid.
Key disputes include Donbas and nuclear plant management.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.08
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Israeli President visits amid outcry and protests

Herzog Faces Mixed Reception in Australia
Israeli President Isaac Herzog arrives in Australia at a deeply divisive time. Invited by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Herzog's visit aims to show solidarity with a grieving Jewish community after a horrific massacre at a Hanukkah festival. However, protests are planned nationwide, labeling Herzog a war criminal.

Albanese’s gesture comes after 15 people were killed near Sydney, and his administration stresses social cohesion. Yet, Herzog's association with Israel's controversial actions in Gaza has ignited public anger. Foreign Minister Penny Wong emphasizes the visit's focus on supporting the mourning community.

Protests organized in over 30 cities target Herzog's state visit, demanding accountability for the conflict in Gaza. In Sydney, pro-Palestinian activists plan significant gatherings despite government-imposed restrictions. "We will be there in huge numbers for a peaceful protest," stated Josh Lees from the Palestinian Action Group.

Jewish communities broadly support Herzog's presence, claiming his visit brings much-needed comfort. Alex Ryvchin of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry calls Herzog a "patriot" with a unique ability to empathize with communities in their darkest times. Despite this, Herzog’s role remains largely ceremonial, separate from Israel's military decisions.

Controversy surrounds Herzog as a UN inquiry accused him of inciting genocide, a charge he strongly denies. Protected by diplomatic immunity, Herzog faces no legal threat in Australia, as confirmed by its authorities. However, Doron Almog, part of Herzog’s delegation, lacks such protection, leading to additional legal scrutiny.

Herzog intends to address misinformation about Israel during his visit, but his presence draws significant criticism. The Jewish Council of Australia accuses the government of using Jewish grief for political purposes. An open letter in major newspapers echoes this sentiment, stating Herzog's presence exacerbates antisemitic tensions.

Since the Bondi attacks, over 3,700 anti-Jewish incidents have been recorded, intensifying fears within Jewish communities. In response, the government has enforced stricter laws on hate speech and firearms. Herzog's visit, occurring amidst these tensions, raises questions about its impact on the country's social fabric.

Police negotiate with activists to ensure peaceful protests, maintaining compromise locations to prevent escalations. The political and social anxieties surrounding Herzog's visit highlight Australia’s broader struggles with Middle Eastern conflicts.

As Herzog arrives, Australian society finds itself at a crossroads, navigating the challenges of supporting its Jewish citizens while addressing the broader implications of international controversies. The coming days may prove pivotal in shaping the nation's response to global political dynamics.

Key Takeaways
Herzog's visit ignites widespread protests.
Reactions underscore deep divisions over Gaza.
Herzog's diplomatic immunity prevents legal actions.




  
Adapted by ASEAN Now from Source 2026-02.08
 

 

ASEAN NOW News
ASEAN NOW News

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications
Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.