zappalot

And your link points out exactly what I am saying: It would be very difficult to doctor around with the data and manipulate it either way, and impossible to eradicate trails leading to the discovery of a possible manipulation. And then, even a president, the most powerful man, with countless institutions acting at his command, does not have a single piece of evidence for his claims? Absolutely nothing? Zero? 2 days ago someone posted an opinion of a right wing project (where even the project marked out that it is an opinion only) claiming to know that the numbers were doctored with, but there was just nothing substantial to it. So far, no evidence for any doctoring around with the data concerned. Correct data collection might be subject to change if we see a trumpist taking over the now vacant position...

1. the revisions were not setting any record (just providing this wrongful information makes me question this basic claim) 2. Normally the one who is accusing someone of wrongdoing should prove something is odd? Especially someone in the highest position in the US should not have the slightest problem to prove something that would be so easy to prove, that is if it really happened..

As a consultant for quality management issues I had some insight about how companies work on, thrive on, hide, point out on certain data. Here is the thing: given some time, usually just a few days, almost everything that is made up or being changed to look different from reality can be discovered and the ones who tried to cheat can be confronted. Now, Trump is a master in accusing institutions or people for anything he does not like. E.g. the rigged election thing. I have never seen any evidence for it, even after he is president again, nothing. Same now for the jobs report issue: where is any, only the slightest piece of evidence for data being tampered with?

Thanks so much, you saved the day (month), now we have an appointment exactly when we wanted it (despite only few slots available in August, and almost none in September...)

At the CW Immigration Center, they have these nice advertisements or signs that it is possible to apply for the extension of stay by making an appointment online. But now, after trying exactly that and selecting the appropriate category as I am married to a Thai national, I get the message shown in the picture attached. Unfortunately, it tells me that it would be only possible if I would be married to a foreigner with a resident certification and alien registration certificate. As I don't give up hope to avoid spending at least half a day in CW, I want to ask if there is anything I maybe have not done right.

I see, did not think they thought that point through. Maybe worth mentioning is that I somehow filled in the flight out section even if I do not have a flight out of Thailand, so i just filled in as fly out date a year ahead and for the flight i gave: not known yet... as we know now that was ok... at least for me...

Came in BKK yesterday, showed the QR code to the IO, which was enough, he did not check at all, could have shown him any QR code found randomly on the web... It would have been ok... They know this whole data collecting thing is nonsense...

Did you show the cracks the administration first? Did they advice to find just anyone to fix the problems?

Cheapest option is the Hatari one for just below 3000 Baht. Because I buy pm 2.5 fabric that I cut by myself to add it in front of the original Hatari filter, thus extending the life span of the Hatari filter by 500%. Effectiveness is 100%, meassured with my pm 2.5 meter... Just for our 60m2 lobby/living room we need 3 purifiers to get pm 2.5 to around 5 ppm on days when outside pm 2.5 exceeds 50 ppm...

The people who build picture content 1 live like picture 2 and 3 Not critizing anything, just find it interesting... Bangkok, Feb 2025

From Feb 13, 2025 about 9 am. AQI is about 150...

must be from many years ago?

I would never obstruct the airflow off the air conditioner in any way. We are using the air purifiers from Hatari since I can easily mount a Filtrete in front of the original Hatari filter. Just takes a few minutes. This makes them very cheap to operate in the long run. The actual filter from Hatari I only replace every one or two years. So in our 50 m² lobby we operate three such air purifiers and get down the AQI index down to about between 15 and 25. In my a bit less than 15 m² office I only operate one such purifier and I have an AQI index between zero and 12. The given values applied to outside AQI about 150.

77 seconds of exposure resulted in the quite active looking picture...