gamb00ler

The change in US regulations only applies to parcels. No need to return the 7162 as anything other than a normal letter.

I suggest that those with brains but not a relevant education or experience should realize they shouldn't be trying to persuade people about the topics where they're ill informed. That doesn't mean they don't have the right under the first amendment.

Good thing you're not earning a living entertaining people as a mentalist. You failed at reading my mind.

..... I certainly agree. That's why I don't write any articles about it. I don't claim she doesn't have the right to write about. I merely suggest not giving her opinion much credence. ... but exactly what is your point?

Sounds like it is the same thing the flat-earthers do. Are you irritated because they stole a page out of your playbook?

This may be the biggest whopper you're ever produced. Please enlighten us with a 2 word synopsis of the fundamental algorithm/procedure/process that is underpinning the recent AI models? This is a super easy question. It should take you 5 seconds.

Approaching our 6 year anniversary of moving to CM... We've sent the replies once with the Thai Post tracking option and 3/4 times with the cheapest Thai Post option. All arrived.

To form an opinion based on the opinions of others while not having relevant experience or education.... sounds more like a rumor mill.

Lots of well written beliefs to be found in the underbelly of the internet (substack, YouTube, X). She doesn't bother to say if she has any education or experience pertinent to the things she believes. I guess blind faith is sufficient for some folks.

Well then.... I've got some great info for you. Formerly favored medical treatments. Some from before Koch's era and some after: from https://time.com/4982099/quackery-medicine-history/ "medieval doctors would press a sacrificed puppy, kitten, rabbit or lamb on top of a tumor because they thought that cancer was like a “ravenous wolf” that would rather “feed off the sacrificed animal rather than the human patient,” as Dr. Lydia Kang and her co-writer Nate Pedersen put it in their new book Quackery: A Brief History of the Worst Ways to Cure Everything." AND after Koch: "In the early 1900s, when people walked into the spa by in Joachimsthal, Czech Republic, they immediately breathed in irradiated air circulating in the lobby. The source of the radiation was a hot spring that emanated radon. Patients soaked in irradiated water and inhaled radon directly through tubes. A few early studies had claimed that radium placed near tumors could shrink the tumors, so doctors at the time thought more was better. “It’s like the difference between treating something with a bomb and treating something with a scalpel,” says Kang." Considered by some to be the pinnacle of treatment of their time. WAKE UP... science has moved on but you haven't.

One of the most convincing examples from your trove of posts showing an utter lack of evidence to support your twisted opinions. Just claim after nonsensical claim. You should go work for a company manufacturing machines that spread manure in the fields. When you apply for the job, take along a copy of your AN posts to demonstrate your extensive experience.

Did you ever work in a movie theater? You seemed exceptionally skilled at projection.

I still have dumb TV's.... I prefer to make them smart with a more general purpose computing device.

no.... it is a personal computer... no caps.... generally PC means Windoze... otherwise almost everybody just calls it a mac.

a dumb TV works just as well... only need an HDMI input

I just tried this URL: https://usa.visa.com/support/consumer/travel-support/exchange-rate-calculator.html Using my debit card that charges no foreign transaction fee would yield: 20000 THB = 621.201662 USD% Mark-up over European Central Bank Rate = 0.18 1 THB = 0.031060 USD 1 USD = 32.195664 THB

You're a fine one to be talking about not seeing the truth. You're fixated on 1890's medical science and ignoring 130+ years of progress. Koch was good for his time but sadly outdated now.

I don't deny that there are some cases of injury from vaccinations. I do believe that many other prophylactic practices also cause harm but the science shows the net benefit is better than without. The history of vaccination has made the determination of value quite clear. Do you use your turn signals? Some harm from their use is possible. Often, in Thailand motorcycle riders forget to turn them off and other drivers may make a bad decision based on the rider's mistaken usage. Let's ban turn indicators!

is it considered to be a lie when you deny that you posted under a previous account name? You yourself provided the evidence that you're the same person. No detectives needed.

Sociopaths also have reasons. They're just not what sane people see as 'reasonable'.

Alter AI only provides guidance in forming a query, it does not have its own LLM. It uses the mainstream AI provider's LLMs.

I don't think it's very considerate of them to encroach upon your specialty. They should stick to their lane.

In that case why post the preamble... just post the link to the specific tweet. If you think the preamble is meaningless... why waste the reader's time?

You posted a reference to a tweet that made silly claims. Did you refer to that tweet because you also agree that it contains nothing meaningful? That would go against the grain of every other post you've made on AN. I explained why the tweet was pure nonsense. Do you agree the new CDC statement merely states that it is impossible to prove a such a negative assertion? That statement covers material learned in freshmen logic class.

A typical failure in simple logic that is your trademark. The phrase tweet you quoted does not mean what you seem to claim. I hope your job in entertainment doesn’t require an excellent understanding of English… because…. that is definitely NOT an ability exhibited in your posts on AN. The quoted tweet implies some earth shattering admission by the CDC. Such is definitely NOT the case. The CDC merely admitted that they cannot prove a negative assertion. Which is absolutely true. Read the following: Proving a negative statement is generally difficult or impossible when it requires an exhaustive search of an unbounded or infinite domain (e.g., "ghosts do not exist"). However, it is quite easy to prove negatives within closed, finite systems (e.g., "there is no orange in this bag"). The difficulty lies in universality, not negativity. Key Aspects of Proving Negatives: The Problem of Universality: It is nearly impossible to prove a general negative statement because it requires examining every single possibility in the universe, which is rarely practical. The change in the CDC’s statement, merely recognizes the above.