KhunHeineken

I have said in another thread that many Aussie expat retirees are going to be in for a shock at some stage in the not so distant future as the ATO, Centerlink, and Immigration data bases spit out the names of people outside of Australia for more than 183 days of a year. Many will be cut off, or taxed at the non resident rate, which is a killer.

How do you send it to them, by Thai Post, or scan and email?

This is an interesting article. A Korean company looking to sell Novavax to Thailand and Vietnam. https://www.kedglobal.com/covid-19_vaccine/newsView/ked202112240013

Ok. I didn't know mirroring was given a RAID category, but you are correct. One thing I don't quite understand is "parity." You can have a 4 bay NAS, and somehow, on the the 4th HDD for example, the data of the other 3 HDD's is stored on it to rebuild a HDD should it go down. How can one HDD store the same data as the other 3 HDD's, or, have I got it wrong and the data of each HDD is spread over the other HDD's, so all of the other HDD's can rebuild the HDD that went down? In some of my research they talk about needing a HDD for parity, and I took this to mean one whole HDD will be used for nothing else but parity.

They have quite a comprehensive suite of programs in the package center. I have no use for a lot of them, but will use several of them. I recently connected the NAS to my UPS. I was lucky, my UPS was supported by Synology.

I haven't tested remote access yet, but will do shortly. I tried with hotspotting my phone, but I don't think my celluar data speed was good enough. I have set up Open VPN back to my NAS. I was under the impression that once I connected to my home network via VPN, I could just go into the NAS by clicking on the Synology Assistant app and entering username and password. Being the connection is via VPN, I thought this was safe. I have set this up. Thanks for the tip. What I mean was, can't a virus be encrypted and decrypted over a VPN, just like all the other data you send over a VPN tunnel? Ok.

Good question, and I'll explain my reasoning. You are correct, a 4 bay NAS was an overkill for me, but I always wanted more than one bay. A single HDD NAS would not provide the redundancy I would like. The logical solution was to look at a 2 bay NAS, and while they can't do a RAID configuration, they can mirror, so if one HDD goes down, you have the mirror and all is good. The chances of both HDD's going down, at the same time, would be slim. When I started looking at 2 bay NAS units, I quickly discovered the 4 bay units were less than $100 more, and sometimes only $50 or $60 more than the 2 bay units. I thought this was strange, so compared many websites, but it was correct. I guess the processor and RAM and OS is the same, and it's not much more to just add two extra bays, so I paid the extra and got a 4 bay NAS. You must have a minimum of 3 bays for a RAID configuration, so I have a 4 bay NAS with 3 HDD's in it and running SHR. If I need more storage in the future, I can add a fourth HDD. I viewed the NAS as a device that would meet my needs for years to come, so went bigger and better to offer some future proofing. To keep the price down, I went for the DS918+ which was superseded by the DS920+, so I got it cheaper, but the previous models do hold their value. Also, I preferred the 918+ over the 920+ for reasons I set out in another post. I don't think I have wasted my money, especially as I learn more and more about the capabilities of this NAS.

Remote access is one of the main features why I purchased my NAS. I travel a lot, and take a lot of photos. I was backing up photos, and a small amount of music, to a large USD drive which I would carry on a key ring. This meant the laptop and camera were in the hotel room / condo, and the USB drive was on my person, so I had the data on two different devices, in two different locations. The USD drive only held photos, video, and a small amount of music, but I wanted to back up system images and large folders, so I went for a NAS. I set up the VPN to the NAS, as you have done. Couldn't a virus or malware just be encrypted and decrypted in the VPN tunnel? I have made the two user accounts also. I haven't done the Recycle Bin setting yet. That sounds like a good idea. Thanks. I understand that any device on the internet is vulnerable. We access so many servers in our daily life that I thought I would set up a small one of my own. I have a large HDD at a relative's place, but that would not get backed up until a return from my travels, and while it's still handy to have, I would like a system that is more instant, at the time of camera upload.

Cheers. The more I learn about my NAS, the more versatile it becomes.

My paid sports streaming service has an app. They apply very strict geo blocking to the app. The servers to my home country have been blacklisted on two paid VPN companies. I'm hoping they can't geo block / blacklist a decentralized VPN so easily, and if they did, you would just be re-routed to another node in the country of your choice, not playing the never ending game of emailing your VPN company and asking them for new IP address, only to find their IP addresses are blacklisted again a few weeks later.

I enabled the Synology AV, and it took hours to scan. My question is, does it offer any protection while the NAS is just sitting idle, 24/7?

I've been reading up on decentralized VPN's. It's an interesting concept, but I have more to learn. If I understand correctly, people all around the world can rent their unused bandwidth on their home or business network, and instead of connecting to a company's VPN server, as most of us have been doing for sometime, you connect to someone's house, or business, and go through their network, which means you are given an IP address that's most likely not blacklisted or geo blocked, which means it would be great for streaming services, which is why I am considering it. With a decentralized VPN you are not on a server with many other people, so just about zero chance of the IP address being blacklisted because it's just a house or business in the suburbs you are connecting to. Is anyone using a decentralized VPN? Is anyone renting out their network to a decentralized VPN? I'm thinking of trying it, but a bit concerned that even though the connection is encrypted, the owner of the node can see all my traffic. Also, what if the owner of the node is up to no good by drug dealing, child porn, terrorism etc and is under surveillance, could your device, and therefore yourself, be flagged? The other side to that is say the decentralized VPN user is up to no good, could the owner of the node be in some trouble? I can VPN back to my house in my home country, but I have a slow internet connection, so not great for streaming. This guy's quick review of the Mysterion DVPN is pretty good.

I am not saying every guy in Issan is like this, but there are quite a lot, but talk to them, and like most guys here, they will say they have never been scammed in Thailand or made a wrong decision. ????

Thanks for the explanation. I was more concerned about the way these hackers scan for ports, not so much what I look at on the internet. I'm pretty careful about opening a link in an unsolicited email. If they can get into an open port, they will have my NAS. I purchased the NAS mainly so I could do some offsite back up, so I am in Thailand, but can store photos and things on my NAS that is back in my home country. I suppose if I am not doing anything on the internet on my home network because I am overseas, that's a considerable less chance of becoming a victim by downloading a malicious file, but that also means the network I am using in Thailand could pose a risk. I do have AV on my laptop, so maybe it's just same same.

I suppose it helps that they are outside of the NAS. From what I read if you use standard hard drives in the NAS the vibration from the spinning discs shorten their life, unless they are specific NAS hard drivers that have been made to handle it.

Do you leave them on 24/7?

Bumping the thread. My NAS has been running for a while now and I am now familiar with some basic features. I'm learning about new features all the time. The NAS is quite a versatile device. I have a few questions, but will start with this question that I asked before, but never received a reply, and that is, antivirus on a NAS. The Synology came with AV, and I enabled it, but all it seems to do is scan the files I am storing. What about some type of attack? The Synology AV doesn't seem to run the same way as my PC antivirus, and the NAS is online 24/7. What do you guys do to protect your NAS from some type of attack, particularly ransomware?

EDIT: 12TB's of storage, not 8TB's.

I purchased my first NAS a little while ago. I'll update a thread I started about it because I have a few questions. I love the NAS also,and I am still playing with it and learning how to use it to its full potential, but I nearly fell off my chair when seeing the price of Seagate Ironwolf Pro NAS hard drives. I have 8TB of storage as well but if you have a lot of TB's to store the cost can really start to mount up, but from what I read the NAS hard drives are reliable. I didn't know you could torrent with a NAS. I'll check that out.

The 183 day rule goes both ways. Stay in Australia 6 months of the year and you will be fine, stay outside of Australia for more than 6 months of the year and you have exposed yourself to the ATO for at minimum, a please explain, to at worse, a tax bill at the non-resident rate, from dollar zero. Who wants to spend 6 months of the year, every year, in Australia? Who can afford to pay non-resident tax rates, and who would pay, on principle? Most have been flying under the ATO radar for the last several years, including myself, but as I previously posted, I have always had the feeling the day was coming when the ATO starts chasing money from expat retirees by declaring them non-residents for taxation purposes. I have been relying on the domicile test should they go after me, but an adjustment to the 183 day rule, making it override the other tests, could make things very difficult or expensive. Given Australia has record debt, the ATO will be chasing every dollar they can, from everyone they can, and being outside of Australia for 183 days of the year makes expat retirees an easy target. I hope I'm wrong, but only time will tell. If, or when, that day comes, the only options I see for myself is staying 6 months in Australia, or selling up everything and moving the cash offshore and having nothing in Australia that can be taxed. I had a look at your link, and when I read things like below, I think I can see the writing on the wall for the future. It reads to me, stay inside Australia for 183 days, no problem. Stay outside of Australia 183 days, and here's your non-resident tax bill. "The proposed stage one test (being the primary test) is based on physical presence in Australia and will be a ‘bright line test’ – that is, a person who is physically present in Australia for 183 days or more in any income year will be an Australian tax resident."

Has Foxtel blacklisted the Australian servers for this Kodi VPN?

If still working, one could financially recover from The Issan Hustle. It's the retired guys that have a set amount of money to last them until they pass, or a small pension. They put a significant portion of it into a Thai family, and into rural Issan, in a country where laws are not favorable to foreigners. I don't need the bright lights of a city such as Bangkok, but I need more options for leisure time activities in retirement than what Issan can offer.

As discussed in previous posts, it turns from "choice" to "no choice" because they have ploughed all their life savings into a Thai family, and rural Issan. In effect, they made a rod for their own back, and they have every day until they die to deal with the consequences of this.

What part of my post do you see any "assumption" in? In your own words the house must be sold in 12 months, the house can be left to family, and a farang can't own land. Put one, or a combination of these together, and how does a foreigner maintain access, that is, living in the house, that sits on land, that he paid for, should his Thai wife die before him? He has to sell it in 12 months, and he can't own the land it sits on, or, it's left to a Thai son, for example, who gives notice to the foreigner because he wants to live in it himself or sell it and keep the money. How often do you think the foreigner could sell it to the Thai family for 1 baht, and the family allow him to live in it until his demise?

There are a lot of toxic relationships / marriages based solely on the exchange of money here. I have no problem with that. There are many western women in "kept relationships / marriages" as well. If one enters into a financial agreement with a Thai lady, that's fine, but they should pay as they go, not buy land, build a house, throw in a bar, shop, or farm, all up front, and expect the Thai lady to then uphold her end of the deal, especially when it's all in her name. Often, when the Thai lady accepts the financial agreement, and thinks now she got the guy on the hook and start to go to work on him, she can manipulate that agreement and he will bend. As you say, guys don't put their foot down. I suppose it's guys feeling comfortable in the relationship and are too afraid to start again, so, they bend, and it's all downhill from there. So funny to hear the threat, "I'll have to go back and work bar again." I'd be saying, "See ya." ???? A lot of guys don't call their bluff, and even if they were serious and did go back to the bar, what's that say about the relationship or financial agreement you entered into? Neither were real in the first place. Foreigners can't own land here, but there's some ways to cover yourself. One way is to have the Thai lady take a mortgage out on a property and you pay the bank every month. Paying the loan interest can be looked upon as insurance. The money in your own bank earns some interest, so it's only the difference you are paying. She leaves, you stop paying the mortgage, the bank can have the house back, and both can move on. The guy you met is correct. It's his house, just not the land it sits on. It's my understanding he would be perfectly entitled to put a bulldozer through it and face no criminal charges. Another phenomenon that you see in these relationships if when the Thai lady starts to compare the money, assets, or wealth of one of their friends or family's foreign partners. The Thai scammer version of "keeping up with the Jones" and what does the foreigner do, he goes and buys a bigger car, or more expensive gold, or more land etc. The two Thai ladies play the foreigners off on each other for spending on them, because each foreigner doesn't want to be seen as not "taking care" as good as the next guy. Too funny. ????