CMHomeboy78

Where is this regulation?

Search engines exist. Use them.

I have searched for years... I have never found a regulation that says that. No one, including Thai attorneys, have ever given a link to such a regulation.

If you are sure I wish you could provide a link because any people have been searching for a very long time.

I don't think such a law exists.

If it did, surely someone would have found it by now.

This is the latest incident in the long running controversy regarding the question: do foreigners have to carry their passports with them at all times?

It would be nice to know whether or not a law exists that says so.

There is no controversy. The regulation exists.

It just isn't enforced often. But if you come to the attention of the authorities for any reason, you must be able to produce it on demand.

There is a controversy and it has been going on for some time now. Where have you been... ?

In the mid-'90s an authoritarian zealot named Purachai - recently promoted to a high position in the national police - gave a long interview to the leading English language newspaper where he stated categorically that foreigners must carry their passports at all times. Photocopies were unacceptable because they were too easily altered.

Since then there have been mixed and confusing signals [re: post #44] coming from the authorities.

A while back I started a topic on this subject but nobody could cite a specific law.

I am still waiting - along with many other farangs - to see it in writing that foreigners must carry their passports.

If indeed such a law exists, it will be a burden for all of us. Until now, photocopies or alternate forms of ID have seemed to satisfy them. But how long will it be before this too becomes an issue and another excuse for extortion in the name of law enforcement?

In reading the full blog posting, it seems that everyone who could produce a passport with a valid visa or current visa-exempt status was left alone. And perhaps a misunderstanding that the people were working (employed by) PunSpace.

So, I wonder if it's really an exercise in harassing digital nomads, or just an opportunity to check visa status for a group of foreigners who are congregated together. I wonder what's next? Will they storm the next Expats Ladies Lunch and ask to see that we all have our passports with valid retirement visas?

I now carry my passport with me at all times. Yeah, I know it's a hassle. I put it in a plastic bag and hopefully it won't get stolen or trashed out.

This is the latest incident in the long running controversy regarding the question: do foreigners have to carry their passports with them at all times?

It would be nice to know whether or not a law exists that says so.

Own a condo there for the past 12 years, never had a problem. A few years back I was in the lobby early in the morning a guest was waiting for a ambulance in a very distressed state. A staff member was sitting with him holding his hand, comforting him.

I was touched by it, it never left me. A good a place as any to hang your hat.

Welcome to the forum Eramus.

It's good to have someone posting who has experience of Chiang Mai, along with insight, and sensibility.

I agree about Wat Phumin. Also the museum, near this temple, is worth a visit. It is located in the former palace of the Lords of Nan, who ruled longer than the CM dynasty and much longer than Bangkok.

Excuse me for bluntly contradicting you, but it should be pointed out that the last ruler of Chiang Mai, Chao Kaew Nawarat died in 1939, and was predeceased by the last ruler of Nan, Chao Mahaprom Surathada who died in 1931. As for the Chakri Dynasty in Bangkok, it continues to this day in the person of HM King Bhumibol Adulyadej.

A comprehensive history of Nan has yet to be written; but what might be of interest to you is The Nan Chronicle. [David Wyatt trans. Cornell. 1994]. Translated from a palm-leaf manuscript written in 1894, it draws on sources dating from the founding of the city in 1368.

Nan played an important part in Lanna T'ai history during the reign of King Tilokarat of Chiang Mai in the 15th century. In 1480, Nan along with the neighbouring kingdom of Lan Chang and its capital, Luang Prabang were seized by the Dai Viet Empire based in Hanoi. The Lao king and his two sons lost their lives in the fighting. Tilokarat helped the youngest son Phaya Saikhao to safety. The Lanna T'ai troops counterattacked, retaking Nan then launched an assault on Luang Prabang forcing the Dai Viet to withdraw.

The French occupation of the Lan Chang kingdom in 1893 ended the importance of Nan. The Chao Luang overnight lost half or more of his territory. and the wealth and power that went with it. Nan was no longer on the trade routes heading east. It became a backwater on the road to nowhere.

So it remained throughout the 20th century. The positive aspect is that so far Nan has escaped the disaster of mass-tourism.

Let's hope that continues.

The 19th century murals in the viharn of Wat Phumin are worth seeing. They were the subject of a very interesting study by the distinguished historian David Wyatt... Temple Murals as an Historical Source. The Case of Wat Phumin, Nan. [Chulalongkorn University Press 1993].

These fresco secco paintings depict the usual Jataka Tales seen in most wats, but here farangs are included. French army troops and gunboats; civilian men. women, and children; and a few oddly dressed figures who have been tentatively identified as clerics.

The various theories surrounding these paintings are studied and explained in detail by Professor Wyatt.

What's it to you?

You aren't a policeman, you don't have a work permit.

Too many old weirdos, watching other old weirdos, get a life, mind your own business.

No, sorry I don't want to drop my kids off somewhere and have them subjected to weirdos like that. Some of those people are child molesters. It's another thing to worry about when you have kids.

Spot on.

My two daughters are grown and can take care of themselves because their mother taught them from an early age that no older man who is not one of the family or one of their circle of friends would make an advance to them with anything other than evil intentions.

Not always true perhaps, but it was a part of their traditional upbringing that I never argued with.

Within Design

9 Charoenprathet Rd. Soi 9,

A. Muang, Chiang Mai

Tel. 053-272111

A good place for graphic design and commercial artwork of all kinds.

Excellent quality work, reasonable prices, courteous and efficient people to deal with.

Good luck getting tickets.

I don't know if "scalpers" exist here. It may be a Western practice that hasn't reached Chiang Mai yet.

Incidentally, welcome to the forum.

If you can't get tickets, the event can be viewed from two satellite venues: the College of Media Art & Technology [CAMT] at CMU, and the Meeting Room Art Cafe.

Contact them directly.

"Just wondering, now that Chiang Mai has once again made the list of top ten retirement countries in the world"

Please tell me what is the capital of Chiang Mai?

Never was good in geography.

I realize that CM is not a country but to better help with your needed geography lesson, CM city is the capital of CM providence, is it not?

Yes it is. Changwat Chiang Mai.

From an historical perspective Chiang Mai was the capital of Lanna T'ai until 1874 when sovereignty was lost to the central government in Bangkok.

A Siamese royal commissioner was appointed whose task it was to oversee local administration.

That was the end of Lanna T'ai's autonomy; but the beginning of its history as an important part of Siam, then modern Thailand.

Chiang Mai is a rat hole! I'm not trolling! The traffic has got to be the worst in the world, there are hardly any footpaths that you can walk on safely, you take your life in your hands trying to cross major roads inside the city, the Dr's are so second or third rate that flying home for health care is a reasonable option. Every Thai in the city sees all falang as an easy mark!

As you can tell I don't live there. After 3 years of making excuses, trying to understand, allowing for low IQ & low EQ, I'd finally had enough and left for friendlier climes.....Lamphun, Uttaradit, Phrae, Rong Kwan, Nan all of these towns are far far better to live in with all of the resourses nessessary for the good life! They even have pizza's!

Chiang Mai is a rat hole? ...well, if you say so.

Every rat smells his own hole.

What will Chiang Mai gain if it becomes a UNESCO World Heritage Site?

Have other cities benefited from it, or have there been problems? Those are the questions that should be asked.

Historically Chiang Mai has been two cities - within the walls, and without. Foreigners were settled outside the walls. Although there was free movement everywhere and never anything like ghettos here.

Lawas, Shan, Jeen Haw, and in the 19th century, Bangkok Chinese. American Protestant Missionaries, and British teak-wallahs had their communities on the east side of the Ping River.

After the arrival of the missionaries in 1867 they were soon followed by British employees of the teak companies. These two groups were the first resident farangs and they have left many first-person accounts that were subsequently used by a number of distinguished historians. Notably, W.A.R.Wood, Camille Notton, Hans Penth, David Wyatt, and more recently, Andrew Forbes.

The traditional division of the city could be applied to a comprehensive conservation plan where restoration efforts are focused on the old town within the moat - the walls have all but disappeared - and the outside areas allowed to develop freely with few restrictions on commercial activity as long as they don't cause harm.

The rebirth of Chiang Mai as a city that respects its past and encourages the highly refined folk arts of its people might be an example and have a civilizing effect on the crass commercialism seen everywhere now.

To address your concern: I don't think that a conservation plan "...may force CM to remain out of the times to preserve an older tradition which is no longer relevant."

As Faulkner said, "The past is never dead, It's not even past." Nothing confirms that more than the dynamic situation faced by Chiang Mai today.

Some very important decisions have to be made by the people who are in positions of responsibility. Let's hope they will act in everybody's interest - not just their own.

Well, if they - the powers that be - consider your words wisely, I will take my hat off. I have neither confidence in local businessmen or do-good NGOs. Only the people who live and breath Chaingmai can come up with the best plans and strong but firm responses to the commercial interests disguised as jobs for locals, that will keep this city alive for another 1000 years. Folk arts...yes, that sounds like an excellent starting point for Chaingmai. I well remember the arts & crafts of 15 years ago which have stood the test of time.

Agreed.

I don't have much confidence in organizations either... governmental or non-governmental.

So much of their money seems to be consumed by administrative costs before they even begin their projects. In the worst cases of corruption and greed they are just pigs feeding at the trough. There are exceptions however, so let's hope that if Chiang Mai achieves World Heritage Site status, UNESCO will be one of them.

Let me clarify what I meant by "folk arts". What I had in mind was the cottage industry production of goods for general use, and not just for the tourist trade. Although the promotion of locally made products for sale to visitors would be a good idea. I'm no fan of Mr.T and his rapacious clan, but his creation of OTOP was laudable, and it should be encouraged to continue.

Gandhi's adoption of Khadi in it's larger sense was a basic element in his revolutionary theories. Similar ideas might work here, even though conditions are quite different now. Education is the key to making any kind of change in attitudes.

What is needed now is a re-evaluation of consumer culture and finding ways to coexist with it without being overcome by it.

Old Chiang Mai is worth saving... I'm sure you agree.

They've got 48 F-16s, about an hour north of BKK (by car). That represents the majority of their airpower. The heads just recently visited the US Embassy to make sure the US would still assist with the 20 year maintenance that is due soon. As long as they don't use them on their own people; it is unlikely to be a problem. F-35 sales might be a different story, but I noticed Oz is buying 72 of them.

Thanks for your factual post.

It could be added that Chiang Mai was conquered by the Burmese and became their vassal state from 1558 until independence was regained in 1775.

Flying sorties near the border is a way of telling them that it won't happen again.

I have a house here in Pattaya from 2009, so far no problems, it's not sinking and the walls haven't cracked too.

It's cheap to have re mods done but the problem as others noted, difficult to find competent people.

We have now found a fairly competent guy and his prices are fair too so all is good.

No shortage of skilled tradesmen in Thai cities... but there is a serious shortage of farangs who are willing to pay them a decent wage and not nickel n' dime them to death.

You seem to take a lively interest in Chiang Mai and its history and traditions.

I share that interest as well, but I must admit an almost total ignorance of UNESCO and its possible agenda for Chiang Mai.

You mention Luang Prabang - a favorite place of mine, although I've only made three visits and none recently, it impressed me very much at the time. I saw a number of restoration projects being carried out, but I'm not sure to what extent, if any, UNESCO was involved. Their activities in Laos and elsewhere in the region might be an indication of what we can expect here.

The preservation of what is left of the old city of Chiang Mai is a concern to all of us, Thai and farang alike, who don't want to see this unique place turned into another concrete jungle.

It can only be hoped that becoming a UNESCO World Heritage Site will slow down, if not stop the mindless commercial development that has destroyed so much already.

Chiang Mai can grow and prosper outside what is left of the walls and on the ring roads, but the old city should be protected the way so many cities in Europe, large and small, have been.

Whether or not UNESCO can further that objective remains to be seen.

I would balance that with it must be true to its locals - the locals have changed recently to combine wealthier incomers though I doubt that is new in the long history of this country as Lanna. I don't think it should serve transient tourist income which serves the economic aims of a local minority and may force CM to remain out of the times to preserce an older tradition which is no longer relevant. My impression of this town is one where you can feel free and friendly and enjoy the beautiful landscape, it has a beating heart.

What will Chiang Mai gain if it becomes a UNESCO World Heritage Site?

Have other cities benefited from it, or have there been problems? Those are the questions that should be asked.

Historically Chiang Mai has been two cities - within the walls, and without. Foreigners were settled outside the walls. Although there was free movement everywhere and never anything like ghettos here.

Lawas, Shan, Jeen Haw, and in the 19th century, Bangkok Chinese. American Protestant Missionaries, and British teak-wallahs had their communities on the east side of the Ping River.

After the arrival of the missionaries in 1867 they were soon followed by British employees of the teak companies. These two groups were the first resident farangs and they have left many first-person accounts that were subsequently used by a number of distinguished historians. Notably, W.A.R.Wood, Camille Notton, Hans Penth, David Wyatt, and more recently, Andrew Forbes.

The traditional division of the city could be applied to a comprehensive conservation plan where restoration efforts are focused on the old town within the moat - the walls have all but disappeared - and the outside areas allowed to develop freely with few restrictions on commercial activity as long as they don't cause harm.

The rebirth of Chiang Mai as a city that respects its past and encourages the highly refined folk arts of its people might be an example and have a civilizing effect on the crass commercialism seen everywhere now.

To address your concern: I don't think that a conservation plan "...may force CM to remain out of the times to preserve an older tradition which is no longer relevant."

As Faulkner said, "The past is never dead, It's not even past." Nothing confirms that more than the dynamic situation faced by Chiang Mai today.

Some very important decisions have to be made by the people who are in positions of responsibility. Let's hope they will act in everybody's interest - not just their own.

Well before the city even puts it name forward, it should be burying the electricity and telephone wires. An absolute mess. Huge big transformers hanging near the side of the pavement. If it thinks it can submit itself in that state its an absolute joke.

The problem of overhead wires - conspicuous and unsightly as they may be - is an issue that can be dealt with.

Other things, it seems to me, such as bulldozing large areas to make way for commercial development in the old city are a greater threat.

The role that UNESCO could play in conservation efforts and education is the question being asked now. It would be very helpful to have more information to base a judgement on. Getting that information is what is important. I was hoping that it would be forthcoming on this thread.

Don't allow yourself to be distracted by minor issues. Tangled and unruly wires can be compared [in human terms] to an otherwise attractive woman having a bad-hair-day. It can be remedied.

Your knowledgeable and often helpful posts about Chiang Mai history set you apart as one of the members whose interests go beyond pizza, burgers, and police checkpoints.

Choke dee.

I grew up in Westchester County, north of New York City.

Now you can't even do minor repairs on your own home. You need a village permit and the work has to be done by a licenced contractor at grossly inflated prices.

That's just one of the many reasons that I like it better here.

valid point.

but there you get it repeired once.here the contractor have to show up show up several times until it is done properly,in the end= same price

Nonsense.

I do my own work here and it lasts. But if I wanted to have it done by others I would know where to find people in the building trades that would put to shame the Americans and third-world immigrants who call themselves carpenters, electricians, and plumbers in the New York area.

The issue isn't about the quality of the work, it's about the nanny-state laws that forbid you to work on your own house. that's what you should be concerned about if you live in a place where they are in effect.

Laws like that have yet to reach Chiang Mai, and like I said, that's one of the reasons I like it.

They were essentially mercenaries and probably didn't know for sure who the "mastermind" was.

It was the money, the car, and the excitement they wanted.

Try "Yar- soop" ยาสูบ should work, I use to smoke ,the firt time I tryd a Yar soop, on a farm ,to say it make me cough is an understatment, it is strong, try black cat ,meow dum in Thai ,5 bart a packet any Thai shop.

+1

Also try the Black Cat Menthol... 20 baht for a 1 oz. plastic can.

I smoke a pipe myself and usually bring premium pipe tobacco with me when I return from trips to Farangland, but when I run out I'll smoke the Black Cat Menthol.

Incidentally, "Yah-soop" is closer phonetically than "Yar-soop"

Areca nut wrapped in betel leaf with lime and occasionally other ingredients added., is chewed here. Legal as far as I know, it was outlawed for a brief period in the 1940s.

Long-term use turns your lips red/orange and your teeth a shiny black like lacquer.

On the plus side, it is said to increase alertness, stamina, and a sense of well-being... sounds like ganja.

I've never tried it, I have enough bad habits.

Your contention that if Chiang Mai is listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site it may be the "kiss of death", is worth looking at.

The possibility that more harm than good could come to the city is very real if the work they propose isn't well planned and carried out.

The prominent architect Sumet Jumsai in his books and in his articles in the Journal of the Siam Society has documented the numerous projects of the Fine Arts Department that aimed at creating "historical parks" io attract tourists. These renovations in many cases drastically altered what they meant to preserve. The 1991-92 restoration of Chedi Luang is a case in point, with decorative elements added in Central Thai style; totally ignoring the many examples of Lanna T'ai art that still exist and could have been used as models.

I don't think UNESCO's future plans for the preservation of historical sites in Chiang Mai should be rejected automatically, but I do think that qualified and knowledgeable people in Chiang Mai should be involved in whatever is done.

It's hard to say what if any effect UNESCO has - I do think it is a precursor to big development coming into town though. Thailand and CM have changed so much in the last 15 years - not all is good. I am all for human development, especially pulling the vulnerable out of poverty and enabling the fit to work...but it is so easy for a place to turn into a theme park. I'm talking of things like local cultural monuments being fenced off from locals, local restaurants being replaced by heavy weight chains, public land being redeveloped for private businesses. The locals lose connection to their land, and lose local economic dependance. In times of economic instability, local people will have little recourse but to fall back on the state, ask for handouts, or steal. I highly doubt that the majority of tourists are gaining anything when the 'real place' has been changed beyond recognition. Exit is through the gift shop.

You seem to take a lively interest in Chiang Mai and its history and traditions.

I share that interest as well, but I must admit an almost total ignorance of UNESCO and its possible agenda for Chiang Mai.

You mention Luang Prabang - a favorite place of mine, although I've only made three visits and none recently, it impressed me very much at the time. I saw a number of restoration projects being carried out, but I'm not sure to what extent, if any, UNESCO was involved. Their activities in Laos and elsewhere in the region might be an indication of what we can expect here.

The preservation of what is left of the old city of Chiang Mai is a concern to all of us, Thai and farang alike, who don't want to see this unique place turned into another concrete jungle.

It can only be hoped that becoming a UNESCO World Heritage Site will slow down, if not stop the mindless commercial development that has destroyed so much already.

Chiang Mai can grow and prosper outside what is left of the walls and on the ring roads, but the old city should be protected the way so many cities in Europe, large and small, have been.

Whether or not UNESCO can further that objective remains to be seen.

Watch out Chaingmai.

The best part of a historic and quirky market I visited for years was demolished - directly prior to it becoming a Unesco World Heritage Site - this was in Greenwich London, right before the Olympic games. They kept the cr*ppy tourist cash generating part. But the market loved and run by locals and those with taste was closed. It has now, oh irony or ironies, become the new site for a School of Architecture...what...?

Having visited Luang Prabang which was also designated - I wonder if this is the kiss of death for local places for local people (no joke intended).

Sure for conservation areas I agree - protect those little critters and their grass before we come and stamp on them.

Your contention that if Chiang Mai is listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site it may be the "kiss of death", is worth looking at.

The possibility that more harm than good could come to the city is very real if the work they propose isn't well planned and carried out.

The prominent architect Sumet Jumsai in his books and in his articles in the Journal of the Siam Society has documented the numerous projects of the Fine Arts Department that aimed at creating "historical parks" io attract tourists. These renovations in many cases drastically altered what they meant to preserve. The 1991-92 restoration of Chedi Luang is a case in point, with decorative elements added in Central Thai style; totally ignoring the many examples of Lanna T'ai art that still exist and could have been used as models.

I don't think UNESCO's future plans for the preservation of historical sites in Chiang Mai should be rejected automatically, but I do think that qualified and knowledgeable people in Chiang Mai should be involved in whatever is done.