Rorri

32 minutes ago, trogers said:

 

No, I am suggesting All students! Especially Christians...

Wow, you do have issues..

28 minutes ago, Si Thea01 said:

 

 

I am fully aware of what is required in detaining someone and under terrorism laws in most countries, people can be detained for certain periods of time, usually 7 days, in order for police to gather evidence and prevent any possible act being committed. 

 

Now, not all people detained are kept in custody and are released because of lack of evidence but are put on watch lists.  The only people that police have to advise of their reason for detention are those detained plus their legal advisors.  They are not obliged to tell the general public anything else other than suspects have been detained.  I don't think I have assumed anything about their guilt, as I, like you, have no knowledge of the intel information forwarded from Australia or what evidence, if any, has been gained through police interviews.

 

A court of law determines the guilt or innocent aspect but given certain people were detained, it is reasonable to accept that they were those whose identities were listed in the classified information provided or do you think police would just go and pick up 8 or 10 students that they just happen to see on the street?  If the students are totally innocent, which they may well be, then yes they may become hostile towards authority, as has been seen in many instances but as for police radicalising them, I don't think so given what it consists of.  Maybe if you checked out this link then you would understand how inaccurate your statement is and what is actually involved in radicalisation.

 

https://www.google.com.au/#q=define+radicalisation

 

 

 

 

 

Oh dear, people are detained, if there is reason to suspect them, there is no indication that there is/was any reason to suspect these students, even now, the police had not released any details, eg, bomb making material, terrorist paraphernalia etc, it was simply because they are students, and Muslim, how do you think other Muslims would feel. And today we have the RTP saying they want to bring peace, to the south, not going about it the right way.

53 minutes ago, oxo1947 said:

.

So you have polled everyone --good work-- but as Mr Spock would say, try to think about rationally..FHT, I am sure the answer will come to you in time....just how much time should be interesting.  ....

 

 

Your comment also has me scratching my head. Mr Spock would say it's illogical.

1 hour ago, Si Thea01 said:

 

No one said all Muslims, that is your statement and a pretty childish one at that given the additional rubbish you added. I clearly stated that some were following fanatical Islam after having been radicalised.  Don't you read?   It was referenced as such owing to the intel received from Australia and what is actually occurring around the world.  Aren't you aware of that?  Given your response I'd say not.  Heightened security and car checks, yeah right, that works, just look at Brussels, Paris, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, need I go on.  No, it will not act as a deterrent, not even to some degree.  Oh some degree, how much is that 5 percent, 10 percent.  A great conclusion, I think not.

 

Where are you going to conduct all you bag searches, car checks, please enlighten us, it should prove interesting reading?  Millions of vehicles, millions of bags, the next thing is you will be on here complaining about people being stopped and searched.  Show me where that car checks have thwarted car bombs, doesn't and is not a viable situation.  The only time car bombs have been detected is where the idiots have stuffed up and abandoned them, the others did their jobs and have killed thousands of innocents. Oh, bag checks, ask the relatives of those who died at Brussels Airport if that would work.

 

 

And please, get off the islamophobia bit.  Come out of you ivory tower or wherever else you sit to write your populist nonsense and see what is going on in the real world.  I am really sick and tired of people taking something and then attempting to generalise it by suggesting people who are being critical are saying all.  We are not but look around you, who is blowing up who, what is their origin, what religion do they follow, albeit a highly fanatical and misinterpreted version of Islam and the Koran.   Just ask any decent Muslim their feelings, they will tell you but because Muslims are killing Muslims they are fearful to speak out, publicly, for fear of reprisals.  If I was living within such a community I would be too considering what these fanatics are up to. 

 

Read the first line, in your first paragraph where you say " That's enough given the age, and positions and more so being Muslims ."

3 hours ago, Si Thea01 said:

 

That's enough given the age, and positions and more so being Muslims, some of whom tend to be followers of fanatical Islam after having been radicalised and are into the killing of  others who are not of the same ilk.

 

Just look at what is happening around the world and the ages, sexes and positions of those involved.  I'd rather be safe than sorry and people should start thinking of the victims and their families and not be so precious about those being detained.

 

You ask why they are being interrogated and then go on to answer you own question without any knowledge of why.  Simply those detained are quite capable of being involved and it appears there is Information about a credible threat to the city from car bombs came via Australian security services. 

 

If the police had any proof, you know what that means, that these students were involve, then arresting them would be OK, but hey, they gave no reason, you are assuming they must be guilty, simply because they are Muslim students... wow! If these students are innocent don't you see the the police could be in fact radicalizing them.

6 hours ago, trogers said:

 

Missed the news in Malaysia on their arrest of an IS suspect who is an undergraduate? One who tried to get into Syria through Turkey?

 

Simply students?

So, are you suggesting, without any evidence, ALL Muslim students are suspects, interesting logic.

Just who are these 8 "suspects" and why are they being interrogated,  last night it seems they were simply students, ok, muslims, but hey, no other reason.

A "war room" required, hey dumbest,  just send a few lazy <deleted> down to collect water samples, then have them tested, no need to waste time on "war rooms" or are you hoping rains will flush out the river so no one face charges, so far 2 weeks and no action.

1 hour ago, alocacoc said:

 

Nah, that's not fair. Their food is not that bad. It's always clean and fresh.

and it is tested, by dogs, before being sold.

1 hour ago, sahibji said:

Rorri those are well trained and disciplined dogs who will not sniff food items.  That is THE great difference.

sahibji, my comment as in fact towards the dog, in 7-11, licking products, not the better trained dogs.

42 minutes ago, tukkytuktuk said:

The first car looks like a Honda civic sedan from 2003-5
The second SUV is a Mitsubishi Triton from 2006-8

Who cares, just think a little, how the hell would the RTP know what cars are being used, if the did, they'd know where they are, and who the "bombers" are... So, my guess is, they have no idea what cars are being used, or who  the "bombers" are. Like many things here, fake.

2 hours ago, ammagic said:

Go to France people - dogs are allowed in most restaurants & even in some supermarkets. I personally wouldn't take my dog but ranting on about hygiene in Thailand is really a bit of an oxymoron

I think it's more to do with the dog licking the products.

3 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

So to put simply, military spokemanLG Sansern lied when he said the deportation was on China's request. Not a trustworthy spokesman. Wonder how many lies he told in the past. 

mmmm, how many times has he opened his lying mouth.

9 hours ago, Brer Fox said:

I suppose to his credit he didn't take out a gun from underneath the  seat and shoot the train for deliberately ramming his car.

He couldn't see a train, how would he see where the gun is, or what to shoot at. :)

1 hour ago, Sooo Upto Me said:

I wonder if these amulets can control their brain?

Also amazing  how the pick up driver behind didn t even bother to get out an help. 

Amulets and their brain, have something in common, when the amulet is made, there is no way of putting any "magic" into it, when their brain is made, there is no way of putting common sense into it, both are useless.

21 minutes ago, sahibji said:

can we also lay some blame on the low test standards for obtaining a driver's licence.

I think we can blame a lot more than that, including genetics.

3 hours ago, Shot said:

Ask your friend if he is prepared to run up and down the street at 70 teaching his kid how to ride a bike. Ask your friend if he is prepared at 75 to spend endless hours coaching/teaching/participating with his child in sports. Will he be ready at 80 to fend off the dipsticks his child might encounter as a teen?

Assuming  he'said medically fit enough, or even alive. Before trying to prove how virile he is, he should be thinking of the kid, have a grand dad as dad. Do'es  he want his kids bought up being poor, uneducate with no really future.

1 hour ago, tbthailand said:

As the activists and Taweesak were about to leave the station, police searched their vehicle and found pamphlets described as "anti-charter" and "Vote No" stickers. All four were accused of disseminating "false", "intense", "provoking" or "intimidating" messages in order to incite unrest or influence voters, which was proscribed by Section 61 and carried penalties of up to 10 years in jail.

 

 

a sticker that says "vote no" is a "false", "intense", "provoking" or "intimidating" message

 

and worthy of 10 years in prison. 

 

Morons... 

 

1 hour ago, tbthailand said:

As the activists and Taweesak were about to leave the station, police searched their vehicle and found pamphlets described as "anti-charter" and "Vote No" stickers. All four were accused of disseminating "false", "intense", "provoking" or "intimidating" messages in order to incite unrest or influence voters, which was proscribed by Section 61 and carried penalties of up to 10 years in jail.

 

 

a sticker that says "vote no" is a "false", "intense", "provoking" or "intimidating" message

 

and worthy of 10 years in prison. 

 

Morons... 

 

Just as well the UK didn't have the same "laws" when the Brexit referendum  was taken, shows Thailand doesn't  have the foggiest idea of "democracy."

If I was Yingluck I'don't spend much lest and ask someone to "remove" a few unelected people, permanently, by whatever means they want.

No that I'don't ever sanction violence 

35 minutes ago, JAG said:

The reality of democracy in Thailand. 

And they are going to "work with " Amnesty International!

 

I suppose that the word "Amnesty " caught their attention, 

Currently  there is no democracy, in Thailand,  even when there is the facade, of democracy, it is always overseen by the military, hence the number of coups. In other words, follow what the military wants, or face another coup. Amnesty is one, of few, organisations, who do not kowtow  to these despots, unfortunately the international community is too silent, they allow these despots to hold power far too long, they should take action immediately  this coups take place, yes there would be short term suffering, but to allow it to go on only leads to long term suffering.

Some drivers should never have advanced past riding a buffalo,  in fact the Buffalo has more brains.

On 30/07/2016 at 3:05 PM, ravip said:

I wonder why so many foreigners strive to live there. .. are they worse perverts?

Paedophiles, ever heard the word?

Majority of those are not Thai. Visit a shrink fast, for your sake.

How many times must people be reminded,  this is about Thailand, no other country,  we all know no country if perfect, but please stop protecting Thailand, just because you choose to live here, face the facts, face the truth.

On 30/07/2016 at 2:28 PM, Agent Sumo said:

Spoken like a typical ignorant farang

"Ignorant" is being given blind date to the TRUTH,seems you might be the ignorant  one. Open your eyes to the truth.

On 30/07/2016 at 1:11 PM, gdgbb said:

Which children are they that are victims of rape that don't make it to the news reports? How do you know about them if they are not reported?

Mmm, you don't  live in a village, do you.

5 hours ago, GOLDBUGGY said:

Not sure I would want to shoot a 357 Magnum with a BB Gun Barrel. Or at least more than once. Some good strong pipe would do better I think and maybe cheaper to. 

Read the last paragraph "from BB guns that he bought from the market, the have their barrels and trigger mechanism replaced with real ones."  even so, I wouldn't risk it.