Bluespunk

She is exercising her right to peaceful protest.

I don’t know much about her nor have I claimed to do so. All I have done is point out she is exercising her democratic right to peaceful protest as were all those involved in this peaceful protest.

Not sects. Different branches of the faith. No different to Christianity in this respect.

Nonetheless she has every right to peaceful protest and bring attention to actions that will add to the climate change crisis. lol-woke

yes, those exercising their democratic right to protest and exposing issues climate deniers would rather aren’t are pesky aren’t they.

As the OP makes clear, many Muslims do not have a problem with the type of depiction at the centre of this dispute. “Sunni Muslims tend to be more strict in their interpretation of a ban than Shia Muslims. For instance, images of the Prophet are more common in Shia-majority Iran. “

She is highlighting a global issue, something climate change deniers do find to be a nuisance. The truth often is for such. She was exercising her right to protest and the poster I quoted stated she should be locked up and the key be thrown away for doing so.

Where did I say she was removed unlawfully? Can you please back that erroneous statement up?

I I thought she was 20

Not opinion. It is a fact she exercising the democratic right to peaceful protest.

From the OP ”Another advocacy group, the Muslim Public Affairs Council, came out with a full-throated defence of the professor. “Dr Prater was trying to emphasise a key principle of religious literacy: religions are not monolithic in nature, but rather, internally diverse," the group said.”

I call it that because that is what it was.

For exercising the democratic right to peaceful protest?

To serve and protect…themselves https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jan/19/two-former-met-officers-charged-with-child-sexual-abuse-offences?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Worship me, gad dammit, worship me you Christian bastards.

They probably do now...

"There's a guy down the chip shop swears he's Elvis, But he's a liar, and I'm not sure about you'' Kirsty McColl

Yeah, I was wondering about that...not sure how much a 3 baht weight gold necklace or a hermes bracelet adds up to. Maybe the amulet was valuable.

Groomed. Not flirted.

Just go to gaol is the better course.

Already given you two links reporting on Charles and Willie being prepared to robustly refute unfounded claims. They have not done so as yet…hmm, maybe no “unfounded” claims have been made…

Nonsense

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/royals/king-charles-william-robustly-respond-28680252.amp

It has already been reported that they will respond to any claims that find objectionable. Don’t you you follow the U.K. media? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11514297/amp/Charles-William-respond-robustly-unjust-claims-Harry-Meghans-Netflix-series.html

No it doesn’t.