Bluespunk

The study that advocates of ivermectin used to boost its profile as a treatment for Covid-19 is now being questioned as being a valid study. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2021/jul/16/huge-study-supporting-ivermectin-as-covid-treatment-withdrawn-over-ethical-concerns?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiWusWex63yAhWcAGMBHdhRCNsQFnoECAgQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ema.europa.eu%2Fen%2Fnews%2Fema-advises-against-use-ivermectin-prevention-treatment-covid-19-outside-randomised-clinical-trials&usg=AOvVaw057X6KfJctqpSytSKBx8pR

The WHO has said governments choosing to mix vaccines based upon research is justifiable. Canada, Germany and a number of nations have chosen to mix and match vaccines.

My question stands.

Asking questions is criticism? My but you are thin skinned. Why a doctor would not want to ease infection rates is beyond me.

But the families will still be in that small space when the day is done, they live in that space regardless of whether there is a lockdown or not.

And how will that ease infection rates?

Page 2 of the last thread contained a news item explaining that only certain brands with damaging chemicals were banned.

As has been said before, there are sunscreens available that do not contain the reef damaging chemicals.

The vision, direction and beneficiaries of that future being decided by China of course.

You have no idea what would have happened if the U.K. had not left the EU, just project fear supposition. Whereas it is a fact that the U.K. could have acted as it did under EU rules and regulations.

@jonnyF: Any replies to this post will be replied to as long as they do not contain abusive name calling because you know you are losing the argument...

You are just continuing your project fear with your unprovable claims... My point that what the uk did would be perfectly legal and allowable under EU regulations...that is a fact,

Not true. EU regulations and rules allow for vaccine rollouts at the discretion of sovereign nations within the EU. The rest of the above quote is just the usual brexiteer project deflect from the facts tactics.

None so tired as he who cannot back up their claim, but keeps digging the hole.

Macron is not the EU, he is the French president, not the EU president. How does that rather vague reference to Merkle equate with anti az rhetoric? Suspending the use of something because of safety concerns, whether they were proven correct or not is not anti az rhetoric. You said anti az rhetoric, now please show the evidence that the EU as a body engaged in this.

I’ve read the links and they do not back up your claims about anti az rhetoric coming from the EU, the Tony Blair article in particular has nothing to do with it at all. The daily express article likewise does not back up your assertion. It’s not me that needs educating as I am very well read up on the EU’s attitude as a body towards az.

Yes countries delayed the roll out and were concerned about the blood clots issue but that is not anti az rhetoric. Macron as french president was skeptical, as I have said. Personally I think he was wrong, but he is not the eu. You said Brussels anti az rhetoric. You have yet to show anti az rhetoric coming from the EU as a body in your links.

You said the EU was anti az. That is not true. The EU’s regulatory body has always favoured az use. At least that is what I assume you meant by “Brussels”…neither macron or Merkle are Belgium. Now I know macron was sceptical over az but not Merkle, what did she say that was anti az?

The EMA is an eu advisory body. What individual nations decide is up to them. The EMA advises, it does not dictate individual nations policies. Those articles are not all opening but the ones that are do not seem to be full of or about anti az rhetoric. Please link to articles showing EU anti az rhetoric.

Anti az rhetoric? What anti az rhetoric? The eu body regulating issues around vaccines, the EMA, consistently said the benefits of az outweighed the risks at that time.

Ah the brexiteer becomes the remainer. How the cosmos doth spin…

So why get the wife of an investigator to chat with him online?

as it made government proclamations all but impossible.

Yeah, well I have little time for conspiracy theories and the netizens who keep promoting them despite known facts. Though there is no doubt the govt has completely ****ed up the vaccination programme.

I know that the full situation wasn’t revealed till later, that’s why I quoted the part from the OP which stated that even after the situation was clarified some netizens still carried on complaining…