Jump to content

OmegaRacer

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    976
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by OmegaRacer

  1. if in Bangkok, why not?

    Well, you have to dress up like a 'gentleman' for one thing. No Sidis, no leathers, in fact it appears no protective gear at all. Okay I guess if they're pottering around on step-throughs, Forzas etc but on sportsbikes it'd obviously be impractical. Can't really see you doing this!

    Suzuki GSX-R1000 L3 182 hp in-line 4 Superbike

    Here we go again. Doesn't seem like a year ago.

    Raleigh Chopper Mk 1 0.5 HP pedal bike

    Hehe I was thinking the exact same thing! Déjà vue

  2. Hey guys

    Just wanted to let you know about this year's DGR. This is the 3rd year for this ride, which is held on the same day throughout hundreds of cities around the world.

    If you've never heard about it, check out last years pictures here:

    http://omega-racer.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-distinguished-gentlemans-ride-2013.html

    To see the details and join the ride, please go to the official DGR forum:

    http://goo.gl/TQzU2m

    see ya

  3. Hi

    I put this question in the ER6 thread, but since there's no answer forthcoming, I hope it'll get more exposure here.

    I recently bought a 2009 ER6n with only 69km on the clock. Love it apart from 1 thing: it's way to quiet!

    I'm used to hear the rumbling and thumping of my SR, which is not only satisfying, but also gives me information about my speed, gear and rpm without having to check.

    I'm therefore looking for a slip-on muffler in the 10k price range that is not too loud, but louder than the original. I do like the understated look of the carbon Akrapovich.

    Do these slip ons already have the bung for the O2 sensor, or does it have to be welded on? Also, will I have problems with backfiring?

    Any brand or shop you can recommend? I don't mind copies as long as they're professionally made.

    Thank you

  4. Creationism is not debated by serious scientists anymore. I think that stopped a couple of hundred years ago maybe more.

    One theory of creation is not as plausible as the other.

    Life after death is a religious myth. I learned this in college 40 years ago and my father 100 years ago and his father 150 years ago.

    Who talks about this stuff anymore? Not in any non religious institution of higher learning except as an example of folklore.

    Please allow me to respond:

    "Creationism is not debated by serious scientists anymore."

    Of course it is, if for no other reason than to refute it. Don't take my word for it, do a google search.

    "One theory of creation is not as plausible as the other."

    Of the two theories I discussed, please explain which is more plausible.

    "Life after death is a religious myth. I learned this in college 40 years ago and my father 100 years ago and his father 150 years ago."

    It may very well be a myth, but I don't know, and neither do you. You have stated a belief, not a fact.

    "Who talks about this stuff anymore?"

    Lots of people. Again, do a google search.

    1. No credible science teaches creationism as a reasonable cause of anything.

    2. Billions are being spent to find details of the beginning of the universe (Higgs boson). 0 is being spent on detailing creationism.

    3. Death is not a myth. Death is a fact. Death is not a belief. When you die you are dead. If you want to provide different information feel free to do so. But hurry up because now we are burying or burning dead people.

    1. Don't know if your statement is accurate or not, but I never stated anything to the contrary.

    2. There is no disagreement that a great deal of money is spent to find details of the beginning of the universe, and I think it is money well spent. I would dispute that 0 is being spent on detailing creationism. I suspect that churches and other religious institutions spend quite a bit on just that. I assume this is in response to my request that you explain which of the two theories of creation I discussed was more plausible. Is the determining factor of plausibility the amount of money spent trying to prove it is true? If not, please explain why one is more plausible than the other.

    3. I never said death was a myth. You made the declarative statement that life after death was a myth. I agreed that it may very well be, but that is a belief, not a statement of fact.

    I am not trying to have an argument with anyone. The only reason I brought up the creation of the universe in this thread was to point out that with so much unknown about our existence how can we say definitively that there is no existence after physical death. We see a magician make a dove appear out of nowhere. We know this is just an illusion, because it is impossible to create a dove out of nothing. But many of us accept that the entire universe was created out of nothing, whether spontaneously or by a supernatural creator. Gravity was mentioned previously. Yes there is gravity, and we know what it does, but we don't know why. We don't even know why time exists, and there is even dispute that it only goes in one direction. Many scientists support the idea of parallel universes, and some even say there are different times in each universe. Perhaps we continue our existence in one of those universes. As I stated before, I don't know the answers, but I do enjoy thinking about the questions, and discovering others viewpoints.

    Life after death is a fairy tale, myth or any thing else you want to call something made up. There is no life after death and that is a fact until someone proves otherwise. I didn't kill cock robin and that's a fact until you prove otherwise.

    An argument from ignorance occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proven true. This has the effect of shifting the burden of proof to the person criticizing the assertion, but is not valid reasoning.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophic_burden_of_proof

    I think you're a bit confused.

    Nobody has proven that there's nothing after death, therefore it's not a fact. Nobody knows for sure, but chose to believe or not to believe in it.

    Based on your wiki quote your statement is just another argument from ignorance.

  5. When one makes fun out of something they don't understand, it says more about their ignorance than about the thing they try to ridicule.

    when some one embraces something they don't also understand. what does that say about them?

    or do you understand reincarnation? if so please explain.

    I never said I understand how it works, nor do I make fun of things I don't understand.

    Do you embrace the teachings about string theory or the theory of relativity? You probably do, but what do you know about it? You have to take a leap of faith and trust those who you think know more about the subject.

    What does that say about you?

    I base my faith on evidence, and there are a lot of evidence to support all the Scientific theories, otherwise they would not be scientific theories ,

    Whet do you base your beliefs on? evidence, or wishfully thinking?

    because call it what you want, all this life after death and magic guy in the sky is nothing other than hubris and wishful thinking, .

    Look at me I am so important the whole universe revolves around me, and unlike everything else, I will live for ever.

    Bla bla bla,

    get over your self.This is all there is, make the best of it now because there is no later.

    I am sorry to be so blunt, I am sure you are probably a very nice man, not unlike all the other very nice religious, metaphysical people, but your thinking and assistance. provides the substrate that nurtures all the other nutcases that have being compromising my life for the past 56 years. and have stifled the human development through out history,

    and frankly I am tired of it.

    Fair enough. You have some personal issues with religious nutcases and I'm sorry that happened to you. I had my fair share of it, too.

    My point was simply that there are plenty non-religious nutcases, it's not a prerogative of religion.

    I base my believes on personal experiences and studies. If they don't conform with your or other poster's worldviews, so be it. I don't mind.

    Everybody has his own learning curve and path to walk, no problem.

    • Like 1
  6. When one makes fun out of something they don't understand, it says more about their ignorance than about the thing they try to ridicule.

    when some one embraces something they don't also understand. what does that say about them?

    or do you understand reincarnation? if so please explain.

    I never said I understand how it works, nor do I make fun of things I don't understand.

    Do you embrace the teachings about string theory or the theory of relativity? You probably do, but what do you know about it? You have to take a leap of faith and trust those who you think know more about the subject.

    What does that say about you?

    Whats good about science is everything starts as a theory that can be scrapped and re thought out when/if proven wrong by others, whats good about gods word? nothing as " Thats it"

    I'm not religious, I don't follow any religion and I hate religious fanatics just like you.

    Spiritual teachings can be examined through the practice of meditation.

    Why don't you try it out and see for yourself?

  7. When one makes fun out of something they don't understand, it says more about their ignorance than about the thing they try to ridicule.

    when some one embraces something they don't also understand. what does that say about them?

    or do you understand reincarnation? if so please explain.

    I never said I understand how it works, nor do I make fun of things I don't understand.

    Do you embrace the teachings about string theory or the theory of relativity? You probably do, but what do you know about it? You have to take a leap of faith and trust those who you think know more about the subject.

    What does that say about you?

  8. I'm not trying to put them on the same level. Just as science explores and maps the manifest world, there's another 'science', or school of thought, that explores and maps the unmanifest world.

    Like I said, don't take my or anybody else's word for it. Find out by yourself.

    Or are you waiting for science to give you all the answers you need.

    In any case, I don't expect anyone to change his mind about life just by reading some forum posts. I know I wouldn't.

    People always find evidence somewhere for what they already believe, whatever that might be.

    All I'm saying is: I know nothing, you know nothing about life and death. Science and spirituality are different pieces of a big puzzle and a true seeker of truth is well advised to embrace both.

    • Like 1
  9. I believe reincarnation is a popular theme in many books, movies, shows. It is a great way to keep people in line. Works great with kids and most often when they grow up they do not realize that they are not kids anymore.

    Hmmm....not condescending at all...well done.

    You're so sure about how everything works, you could answer some of the big questions that have bothered humanity for thousands of years.

    I won't hold my breath.

    Those who don't know speak the loudest.

    Or...

    He who knows not and knows not that he knows not is a fool; shun him.

    He who knows not and knows that the knows not is a child; teach him.

    He who knows and knows not that he knows is asleep; wake him.

    He who knows and knows that he knows is wise; follow him

  10. Where were the souls before the earth was formed?

    This is a very 3D question...

    When we return home, we transcend 3D and merge with all there is. You might as well ask where love is or where God is (if you believe in God, that is).

    If you really want a 3D answer, I could say that Earth is a pretty young planet and there are far older ones out there.

    Besides, where is your soul now?

    • Like 1
  11. <script type='text/javascript'>window.mod_pagespeed_start = Number(new Date());</script>

    Personally, I embrace both science and spirituality (not religion). I used to be atheist until I had a profound experience. After that I just couldn't deny that there was something more. So I started reading everything I could put my hands on, trying to make sense out of what happened. I found that others had had the same or similar experiences.

    My 'believe' is rooted in first hand experience and mixed with knowledge from many very special people who have walked the path before me and I feel I can trust them.

    This is no different from what atheists do, by the way. Their believe also is a mix of their own unique experiences and data they take from reliable sources, which they assume to be true.

    I have no problems with people who deny the existence of something beyond our 5 senses, as long as they don't try shove it down my throat. Sadly, many do.

    Regarding reincarnation, I have no doubt I've been here many times before.Thailand didn't change that.

    I don't identify with my believes. If there would come along a better explanation (even a scientific one), I would gladly accept it.

    Many people are afraid of dying and they do anything possible not to think about it. I think this is the time to learn as much as we can about death. Once you lose the fear of death, you become free to live.

    Let's not forget...our 6 senses. The mind comes into contact with phenomena just like the eyes and ears etc etc.

    What was your experience, if you don't mind? (just interested)

    And i couldn't agree more with what you say about learning about death.

    [quote name="UdeBoCM" post="8098809" timestamp="1405

    -................sorry,messed up the quote..................

    I rather not throw the details of what is one of my most precious moments of my life to people who won't understand them and worse just redicule them.

    I have no need to convince anyone.

    If you really want to know, send me a PM and I'll try to answer your questions.

  12. Personally, I embrace both science and spirituality (not religion). I used to be atheist until I had a profound experience. After that I just couldn't deny that there was something more. So I started reading everything I could put my hands on, trying to make sense out of what happened. I found that others had had the same or similar experiences.

    My 'believe' is rooted in first hand experience and mixed with knowledge from many very special people who have walked the path before me and I feel I can trust them.

    This is no different from what atheists do, by the way. Their believe also is a mix of their own unique experiences and data they take from reliable sources, which they assume to be true.

    I have no problems with people who deny the existence of something beyond our 5 senses, as long as they don't try shove it down my throat. Sadly, many do.

    Regarding reincarnation, I have no doubt I've been here many times before.Thailand didn't change that.

    I don't identify with my believes. If there would come along a better explanation (even a scientific one), I would gladly accept it.

    Many people are afraid of dying and they do anything possible not to think about it. I think this is the time to learn as much as we can about death. Once you lose the fear of death, you become free to live.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...