Johnsen

Still not enough evidence to charge these 2 boys with murder.

Then why are they allowed on the island in the first place. People renting bikes to people with no licences should be charged..

Still say there's not enough evidence to charge these boys with murder.

What part of there is not enough evidence to charge them with murder do you not understand.. We can agree on rape via DNA but not murder.

I hardly think I'm the only one who thinks there is no evidence of murder. Let's ask shall we and keep this one fact right out there right up front. No blood stained clothes. No finger prints or DNA on the hoe. No wine bottle. Only a DNA semen match, again that does not prove murder.

So let's charge the 2 kids with rape which they allegedly have DNA evidence of and get back out there and look for the murderers. At the very least let's not close the case.

Yes let's take it to trial with no evidence of murder. They r all in here today people JD, JTJ etc. Reckon we might have hit a raw nerve somewhere.

You might ask why they would do that if the police evidence was so strong against them. Basically signing themselves up to life and or death. Why recant their confessions. Forget lawyers and crocodile tears, you get a reduced sentence if you admit to a crime in Thailand. Strange they would recant confessions if the did it. To which of course the police have no proof of murder.

Because they have put the case to bed based on no evidence of murder. The case has twice been sent back. Rape possibly with DNA, murder absolutely not. Not enough to stop investigating anyway.

Yet still the possibility of murderers roaming the island and the police have put the case to bed.

Thought you wouldn't be to far away. Still doesn't prove murder.

And their retracted confessions don't make any sense. We all know you get a reduced sentence if you confess. Why would the boys retract knowing if proven guilty they its life or death. Again that doesn't make any sense. The only people a confession helps is the police who are doing a terrible job. Let's leave the confession no confession out for that reason right there.

SEMEN DNA DOES NOT PROVE MURDER. No evidence of that, no blood stained clothes, nothing. Finding a phone doesn't prove murder, they could have been dead already and stupidly picked it up...

Again the problem we have is if the DNA matches the 2 Burmese kids it doesn't prove they murdered her. No DNA on the murdered weapon, no fingerprints and no wine bottle. Even in media reports a case for murder has not been solved or proven. Why has the case been closed.

If they don't have DNA then they have nothing. I agree if there case was so conclusive it would not have been sent back twice. Strange thing is its been sent back yet the police have said they have closed their file....

What's wrong with suggesting it would be unwise to visit koh toa with the possibility the murderers are still at large. Any sane man would tell you that we don't know for sure these 2 kids did it. I think that's very relevant to this discussion.

There is no evidence to hold them for murder?

Is that why you abuse so many on here....

Recanted confessions that you have already alluded us to...... Well where is the evidence do you still have no thoughts of your own..

For gods sake now your just hanging yourself and talking to yourself in the third person. Why hang around if you feel that way... Who says all this..

Where is the evidence to hold them for murder????

Where's the evidence to hold them for murder????

No mate I won't calm down. Why calm down because you say so. We have reached an interesting conclusion. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO HOLD THESE 2 kids for murder. Its a bit rich of you to say calm down when you are the one on here spending overtime replying to every man and his dog. How about you do us all a favour and calm down.

Everybody if you want to shut these 2 up just ask the simple question. WHAT EVIDENCE DO THEY HAVE TO HOLD THESE 2 KIDS FOR MURDER.

Look who has been drawn to the table. Old mate JTJ come to help out JDINASIA. Neither of them can answer the question.

And that's where your argument ends. Legally a conspiracy is an agreement to commit a crime.

You couldn't answer the most important question of them all. What evidence do the Thai authorities have to hold these kids for murder.

Recanted confessions that you have already reminded us of... And