JCauto
-
Posts
1,793 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by JCauto
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, steven100 said:he means kids in schools
Careful Steven! By proxy, you're actually criticizing his boss, the great man you have admired slavishly since he stole power in a coup. Wouldn't want to go back on years of undeserved praise and defense for the sake of ganja now, would you? Perhaps you ought to try some, could maybe help your muddled brain.
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
12 hours ago, RichardColeman said:The way the current far left are destroying America from within, I cannot blame them
Far Left. LOL. How little you understand about politics.
Bernie Sanders would be a Centrist politician in Canada.
- 4
- 1
-
9 hours ago, Sparktrader said:
Consensus isnt science and there is no one opinion. Lots of views from mild to strong.
Of course. But you understand what I was saying. This is not a controversial issue among the informed.
-
6 hours ago, Sparktrader said:
Google skeptics. Look at how many there are.
Yes. And they're a tiny minority. It's a big issue involving an enormous amount of scientists in a wide range of disciplines. The consensus is overwhelming.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, Sparktrader said:Do some research. Study the data. You will find there is a lot more to the story.
Start with 1908 to 1942.
Dude, you're welcome to join the discussion with those people (there are many) who are working in that aspect of Climate Science. I too work in related fields (forest conservation), but different ones than those. I have too much work to casually review the decades of effort in another field I haven't received specific training in.
But understand that when I say "join the discussion", I mean do what you actually wrote. Do the research in a structured way and compile or source your data and publish your analysis in a credible publication (the bigger the better, but you'd want such groundbreaking stuff to get the widest distribution and receive the most criticism so you can be sure you've got it right). Then you'll be taken very seriously, and your research will be looked at with the aid of fine-toothed combs. Perhaps you're the One, the man who discovered the straw that broke the Climate Change back! You'd be applauded by all of your friends and the fossil fuel industry will lay gold and jewels at your feet.
But until you do that, <deleted>. There is widespread consensus about Climate Change among a huge coalition of credible scientists working in a range of different fields whose data all points to the same conclusion.- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, BritManToo said:Why would Thailand pander to a woke, western delusion?
Because they wish to follow the science that overwhelmingly backs such policy?
Perhaps the eminent poster would care to provide their credentials and world-class research that has been peer-reviewed to open a reasonable discussion about minutiae of the policy or scientific consensus? Of course they wouldn't, because the "Climate Change is a hoax" crowd have long coalesced into a confederacy of dunces. But do tell us about it, now that you've exhausted your research on epidemiology or whatever other Youtube U you "graduated" from.- 8
- 1
- 4
- 3
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 7/23/2022 at 7:57 AM, RichardColeman said:I vote we keep every penny and say it is reparation for all the migrants the EU has allowed to travel to the UK and their subsequent social services and benefits bill for the years ahead.
You've already gotten what you voted for. Enjoy it and accept your responsibility rather than continually whine against others who had much more sense than you and your ilk.
- 3
- 2
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 minutes ago, worgeordie said:He most likely slept through the coup.wake me up when its over ????
regards wrgeordie
That's why he needed all those expensive watches, the alarms on his ordinary casio didn't work.
- 4
-
4 hours ago, RichardColeman said:
Sure bet my compatriots back in the UK will be moaning like hell about the cost of gas and electric come the winter months and moaning they wish it was summer again.
No doubt. You live in Thailand and moan like two cats courting in the middle of the night.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, Thechook said:Seriously we're we taking readings and records 125,000 years ago?
Are you this dense and ignorant of science? If so, why do you post publicly your lack of knowledge?
- 2
- 3
- 3
- 2
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 hours ago, smedly said:I have no issue with someone partaking in consuming weed in private - but this idiot is trying to get a country addicted, a government promoting this is very careless and will not end well, the medical use excuse has been abandoned - they need to get control of this now before it gets out of control otherwise the basket case ratio in Thailand will rocket, weed has long lasting well documented mental side effects when abused
LOL! Here comes ol' Smedly from antediluvian times to proclaim that despite the decades of research showing the opposite, cannabis is actually addictive and doesn't have any medical benefits! Tell us about how women abandoning petticoats has affected the morals of youth!
- 4
-
On 7/19/2022 at 3:07 AM, smedly said:
engineer of what exactly ?
how about sharing your opinion on the the topic instead of the "I'm an engineer and you are all talking ##" stupid nonsense and quite frankly for a self claimed expert on everything - well you have to be since according to you we are all talking z3#................the engineer of ? ##, I will guess you from the USA who have to odd ## that thinks they know everything..........you don't
oh and I have 3rd level education but I don't need to brag about it, common sense overrides stupidity no matter how smart you think you are, right now pretty much everyone has an opinion about you, try joining and contributing to the conversation instead of telling everyone they are stupid because you are "an engineer" lol
Civil engineering, seeing as you're so interested.
Despite your 3rd level education, you were unable to discern my point, that being the almost complete lack of technical expertise or experience amongst the vaccine and mask skeptics. That you are so interested in the minutiae of my degree yet unable to describe any technical aspects of your own (other than "3rd level") tells me I was correct. -
Yes, they're so much more influenced by pornography in movies than by, oh, the dozen or so places selling sex openly that they walk or drive past every day on their way to school. I'm sure the dreaded porn affects them much more than their father having a mia noi who is only a few years older than they are.
- 1
-
2 hours ago, smedly said:
and you of course are a genius at everything
No, not at all, although I may be better at maths and science than you since I'm an engineer. Or perhaps you're one too?
Doubt it, since you're rabbitting on about pandemic response without acknowledging the millions of people who were saved by it. In my experience, practically none of the Google PhDs in Epidemiology that suddenly appeared have much if any of a technical background. But boy, they sure do learn quick! Seems I made a big mistake by studying and working in technical fields for years when all I needed was a few Youtube videos and Bob's Your Uncle!- 1
- 1
-
Wow, all the amateur epidemiologists are back! Were you finally going back to uni to catch up on those noisome statistics courses you missed out on the first time? Excellent that y'all realized you were talking about things you hadn't a clue about so decided to swot up! Just wondering though how you managed to acquire decades of experience as well in that short time since you were last pontificating...
- 2
- 5
-
9 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:
The answer is obvious , everyone would choose the baby .
But if I were to reply with "The baby" , he would try to use that to make me wrong about something, or that I'm a hypocrite or something or prove some other point .
He seemed to be making the point that babys have more value than unborn babies .
Everybody would choose to rescue the baby
Exactly. Thank you for being honest. Now use the same calculus to assess the value of the unborn in comparison to that of the mother. The unborn do not in any case have any precedence over the living.
- 1
-
16 hours ago, JCauto said:
There was a great analogy I read the other day that clarifies things in this endless and fruitless debate. It's a variation on the "Trolley Problem".
You're in a house that has caught on fire. The house is a Center for Reproductive Health. You wake up in a panic and rush to get out. On your way out, you quickly open a door because you hear someone screaming in terror and inside there are two chairs. One has a child of 1 year old on it. The other has a big container with 1,000 in-vitro fertilization eggs that have already been impregnated with sperm and the cooling systems to maintain them. You can only carry one and what is left will burn. What do you do?
Yo! Mac! Mac Mickmanus! Did you see this post? Why haven't you responded? What would you do? You've responded to other posts since I sent this and you responded to my other posts about this topic. Simple question. What do you do? HELLO!!!!!
-
2 hours ago, JCauto said:
There was a great analogy I read the other day that clarifies things in this endless and fruitless debate. It's a variation on the "Trolley Problem".
You're in a house that has caught on fire. The house is a Center for Reproductive Health. You wake up in a panic and rush to get out. On your way out, you quickly open a door because you hear someone screaming in terror and inside there are two chairs. One has a child of 1 year old on it. The other has a big container with 1,000 in-vitro fertilization eggs that have already been impregnated with sperm and the cooling systems to maintain them. You can only carry one and what is left will burn. What do you do?
By the way, the person who wrote the original analogy observed that when he would post this on fora, he practically NEVER gets a response because everyone knows what the answer is including the so-called "right-to-lifers", hence they simply won't answer. Prove us wrong Mac!
- 2
-
1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:
Though Thaksin was beloved by millions, and did a far better job than Prayuth could ever dream of doing, it seems that the family is fairly toxic at this point. Time for some new blood. Some smart, creative, youthful leadership.
Oh, you mean the Future Forward Party? Gee, what happened with those guys?
-
1 hour ago, Misterwhisper said:
This is like freakin' deja-vu.
In my opinion, it's rather clear why PTP fields an unexperienced "girly" like Paetongtarn. who at 35 years old cannot possibly have attained the political acumen to head a government and whose knowledge of economics is limited to spending her family's wealth....
Then again, Thai politics has NEVER been about political competence and fielding the right people. Instead it's ALWAYS been who is going to get their turn at the feeding trough next.
Okay...so first of all, PTP hasn't fielded this woman as their leader, this is the response of people to a NIDA Poll. You know, as in "I, Prayuth, NEED A Poll that shows I am a popular Prime Minister..." That he finished 3rd in a NEED A Poll is about as big a condemnation as you're likely to observe in this land when it comes to powerful people who gained it via having guns.
Second of all, while your last sentence is true, why should it be accepted as being so? When it appears that there may actually be an independent candidate or party, he's sure to be quickly moved to the side (do you recall Thanathorn?). And don't think this is just the Military who were on board with that; the Democrats and Peua Thai would similarly be pleased to see him shuffled off to the sidelines. That's what they REALLY don't want! But second-worst is Thaksin, who for all of his bluster, lack of respect for institutions and corruption did something nobody else had previously done - pointed the government firehose of funds towards the North and Northeast and decentralized power to them. That's something they'll never forgive, and why he's still Public Enemy Number One. Once the people realized that this was possible, the genie was out of the bottle. Now they'll put him or his relatives or sock puppets back whenever they're allowed to do so.
The biggest disappointment for me remains the pathetic attitudes of the Bangkokians and other Thai who know better but won't vote against their own interests because they're essentially beneficiaries of the corruption and, at the end of the day, aren't willing to suffer even minor inconvenience to get real change. Oh, and the even-more-pathetic foreign cheerleaders (Steven100, care to offer another full-throated defense of the powers-that-be?).- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
5 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:A paid for dog of the General who himself was installed as a Senator and not elected speaks out....time the curs leave the government to the regular people.
His Master's Voice:
- 3
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
17 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:You dont seem to be aware what an "elective abortion" is :
"An abortion is referred to as an elective or voluntary abortion when it is performed at the request of the woman for non-medical reasons."
The figures and graphs I provided state "elective abortion" which means not at the advice of a medical person but voluntarily elected by the woman .
You're not the sharpest tool in the shed. Yes, an elective surgery is one where it is performed at the request of the patient rather than required according to the medical necessity of their condition. However, this does not mean that a woman in this case goes "I want to abort my baby at 27 weeks" and the doctors go "well, she said she wanted to do it, so let's scrub up and get to it!" Are you really that ignorant of medicine and medical practice? Have you never been to a hospital?
And while I don't have nor am I willing to do the research into how your maps or graphs were created, in a situation where the doctors examined this woman and discovered that her foetus would almost certainly have birth defects or other issues, or that the pregnancy was unlikely to reach term, or any host of other reasons, then she would have a choice to make. If she chose to abort, then that would be "elective", but does that describe this woman's situation in detail? It lumps her in with someone who discovers they are pregnant at 4 weeks and does a simple abortion.
You clearly have little understanding of the realities of modern medicine and the situations of women, whom I will note don't rate a mention in your considerations. It's all about YOUR unborn baby's life. Women are not your vessels or property.- 2
- 1
-
18 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:
It doesnt really make much difference , you are still depriving a living being of a life , whether you do that after 9 weeks , 20 weeks or 30 weeks, doesn't really make much difference . To are just ending that life a few weeks earlier
There was a great analogy I read the other day that clarifies things in this endless and fruitless debate. It's a variation on the "Trolley Problem".
You're in a house that has caught on fire. The house is a Center for Reproductive Health. You wake up in a panic and rush to get out. On your way out, you quickly open a door because you hear someone screaming in terror and inside there are two chairs. One has a child of 1 year old on it. The other has a big container with 1,000 in-vitro fertilization eggs that have already been impregnated with sperm and the cooling systems to maintain them. You can only carry one and what is left will burn. What do you do?
- 1
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
On 6/28/2022 at 9:57 AM, Mac Mickmanus said:Can we just talk about normal relationships and pregnancies , rather than abnormal relationships like rape and incest ?
No, because when you make laws, they apply to everyone UNLESS those exceptions are made. And the laws that are being passed by the anti-abortion states allow for no exceptions.
There's quite a simple way for you to understand this. Imagine yourself as a woman, and consider that situation where some guy is insisting that you have to do something with your body, or even that you're being forced to maintain a pregnancy for 8 months or so with no options, and that you cannot make any medical decisions without that person, whether their rapist or abuser or relative, having an equal say in the matter. You okay with that?- 2
- 1
PM Wants Nationwide Entertainment Venues Checked
in Thailand News
Posted
Horses gone? Quick! Bolt the barn door!