Jump to content

15Peter20

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    968
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by 15Peter20

  1. Did I imagine that just 24 hours ago he stressed that the rule of law must be followed. Today's outburst said that basically when he thinks he has bought enough support from the retarded and feeble-minded, screw the rule of law and democracy, he will rally his slackjaws and attempt to gain control over Thailand through terrorism. Entirely predictable IMO.

    By 'retarded and feeble-minded', are you referring to a large portion of the electorate?

    Just want to know where you're coming from.

  2. "He said that it would depend on the National Reform Council to decide whether there should be a referendum or not."

    Probably better to come from the reform committee than from the PM. Mind you, from comments I gather some posters would really like the PM to force his way through rolleyes.gif

    Do you enjoy being lied to?

    He said he hasn't got the power to order a referendum. Section 44 gives him that power. What part of this logic do you disagree with?

    Not sure how things were phrased in Thai. "no power' or 'not wise to use the power' ?

    Anyway, the logic which keeps on suggesting the PM uses A44 as a magic wand and then goes on about the dictatorial aspects of using said wand is somewhat faulty logic.

    I suggested nothing, but anyway, well done!!! You are so right!!!! Amazing!

  3. Oh... The woes of billionaires! Definitely deserve sympathy from the 60 million Thais living on mere pittance incomes.

    You quie aptly sum up one of the major issues with foreigners here.

    That you think about class issues and not that he was a victim of crime.

    Why should anyone think he was the victim of crime? He will be a victim of crime if his allegations are proved in court.

    No.

    Being the victim of a crime doesn't require proof in court.

    Being guilty of having committed a crime requires proof in court.

    Your reasoning would say that a person who was robbed actually wasn't unless the perpetrators were caught. The same with murder victims / rape victims etc

    I understand what you say of course, but without the proven facts the idea that he is a victim is not much more than speculation.

    Of course he might be a victim in actual fact, but if we don't see the evidence for it, then by suggesting that he is indeed a victim, you are engaging in that which I think I have seen you chide others for in this forum - speculation.

    • Like 1
  4. Oh... The woes of billionaires! Definitely deserve sympathy from the 60 million Thais living on mere pittance incomes.

    You quie aptly sum up one of the major issues with foreigners here.

    That you think about class issues and not that he was a victim of crime.

    Why should anyone think he was the victim of crime? He will be a victim of crime if his allegations are proved in court.

    • Like 2
  5. I've been intimate with women that have passed out from alcohol and drugs.So being intimate with A dead woman I guess about the same except A little stiff,and the smell.

    I talked to her after she woke up and she say's she didn't care what I did.That if she wasn't awake,then not A problem.

    I mean if A woman wants to be intimate with me when I'm sleep or dead it wouldn't bother me.

    OMG......

×
×
  • Create New...
""