Thorgal

That's a typical example of : 1. devaluating the original message of a poster 2. continuing repeated persecution on divers topics through guilt tripping and stalking 3. impersonating the AN authority by repeating to adhere to the rules, moderator warning, etc...to legalize the future report function and to generate a virtual warning

Your reply confirms a specific part my previous post : "Problem that I have with AN is that public bullying is at a much higher frequency than TV. This bullying includes (and not limited to) : targeting alone or in group of an individual, gaslighting, harassment, name calling, racism, stalking, threatening, framing to get suspended, etc. Just watch the last 10 pages of “Israel is at War” topic to have an impression."

1. Correct, but that's rather a model of the 80's that has been replaced with total quality management. Your suppliers, workers, all third parties have to be implemented in your total quality plan to create quality assurance. And yes, I did a core well hidden Ishikawa to be honest before posting my top 10. 2. Customer satisfaction is not re-evaluating the concept of used emoji's.

A certain healthy favoritism is always acceptable and can be seen as a good marker in all sorts of relationships. But I think that TV moderation was going too far to mutate/transform this favoritism to offensive and defensive cronyism. It started to develop in such way that argumentations of posters were unconditionally backed by some of the moderation. Posts could be removed or modified and posters could be suspended for multiple times. This was part of the informal ruling on TV. I also understood that the high quantity of members at a certain time also allowed some of TV moderators to exaggerate in these informal ruling that made (many) posters quit TV. Please check out online debates or complaints available of many who left TV and you will see that overall TV critics is not per se on the content that was available, but more on the treatment or injustice that happened for those who highlight the TV cronyism. Being a neutral moderator is very difficult and, in some cases, even impossible. Many of us are also not the most polite, elegant or eloquent posters on TV/AN. But they’re also needed to boost or generate more “click-traffic”. Problem that I have with AN is that public bullying is at a much higher frequency than TV. This bullying includes (and not limited to) : targeting alone or in group of an individual, gaslighting, harassment, name calling, racism, stalking, threatening, framing to get suspended, etc. Just watch the last 10 pages of “Israel is at War” topic to have an impression. Again, this works both ways: it generates a lot of “click-traffic” but some members can/should not be able to carry these personal attacks for a long time. So my top 10 of reasons why people leave (and some stay) : - Cronyism: some posters are over-protected by moderation - Cronyism: some posters feel injustice and misunderstood - Cronyism: in some cases: POTY election - Unfair suspension and/or banning - Limited (political) international news - Bullying in person or in group by other posters - Low variety in posters with same interests or taste: for instance : no much (expat) women - Bad/unclear transition from TV to AN - There’s no sign of quality management and customer satisfaction process - Little or no criticism to moderation is allowed

I've talked about the evidence that is irrefutable. I didn't say that the editor or news channel is irrefutable. Try harder.

The AJ_EN evidence in the footage is irrefutable. The IDF_Twitter evidence is twisted and fake. The origin of the messenger is not relevant, but agreed, can be an indicator in being biased or fake news under war propaganda from both sides. I've checked both evidences and I had to accept AJ_EN as acceptable and correct, despite the relations between Hamas leadership and Qatar.

AJ_EN is a reliable source and the tunnel case next to the hospital was debunked. Case closed.

Ah, the HVAC boy My quote : "There's not western press in Northern Gaza and IDF Twitter is not reliable." There's no Western press in the Northern Gaza area above the Gaza river (IDF ground invasion phase 1 ongoing now).

In eschatology you need to see the full picture and be on the right side from the beginning.

Agreed, it reflects a response in line with supremacist and exterminalist agenda (AMALEK) of the Israeli coalition of Benjamin Netanyahu with the ultra orthodox and ultra right wing conservative and radical political parties. I've denied the labeling of anti semitism on me multiple times in this thread in my post like others. I've asked to back up or proof multiple times through my posts (snippets) that I've posted anti semitic content = none of them were replied... I didn't provide an analysis as I didn't provide a conclusion...let's call it a guideline for one side and a warning for the other side as you promote only bipolar logics.

Let the moderators reply. They have the authority.

Scroll back to page nr 1 and you will see that these "antisemite" denominations have been created to frame people like me and others Criticizing Israeli government = you become anti semite Criticizing Zionist ideology = you become anti semite Criticizing Apartheid ideology = you become anti semite Criticizing war crimes = you become anti semite Criticizing crimes against humanity = you become anti semite Personal attacks are common and daily practice on this topic if you criticize one of the above. There are 3 levels : 1. Level: You will be replied : liar, idiot, stupid, waffle, etc 2. Level: You will be replied : Hamas lover, anti semite, you want the destruction of Israel, etc 3. Level: You will be replied : holocaust denier, nazi, you like Hitler, etc. Note : this structure is also used on other public platforms, so it's not something new or unique on AN

I think this choice is at the discretion of the moderators of AN and I don't know where it's written or communicated that these Russian media outlets are forbidden. Some AN members are from Russia and living in Thailand. This is not really inviting for this community. If it's not accepted by forum rule : no problem for me to abide these forum rules. Note : I still have the TV framework in mind, that's why we might differ from using external resources

My quote : "Don't try to distort my words that combatant extra judicial fighters from 7th of October became freedom fighters too." Why do I have to give a link of something I didn't say or why should I give a link of what you distorted...? Case closed : You've tried this already. Didn't work.

I'm not a Hamas supporter. You don't need to try to brainwash me. I've no affinity with Hamas leadership. Again, my position is neutral and unbiased. Israel government created this Hamas Golem in 1987. they have to fix it. I feel for the neutral Israeli and Palestinian civilians that want fast peace and want to live fast together. My position (and other posters) has been distorted ad nauseam since the beginning of this topic.

In case of self defense as per international law they become from non combatant to freedom fighters. This was my warning that this conflict will be extended. Don't try to distort my words that combatant extra judicial fighters from 7th of October became freedom fighters too. Russian preferences to media is that I like to double check with their channels RT, Sputnik, Tass, etc...for topics related to ME, UKR/RUS, SYR,...

Ah Ok, I get it. You cut off the water, gas electricity from the civilians in Gaza and you will show the marble-floored mansions and luxury hotels in Qatar for the Hamas leadership to distort public opinion against Hamas leadership...as war propaganda?

Why my buddies?

There's a logo from Hamas on each video footage like there's a logo of IDF on each of your IDF Twitter footages. Double standards again ? Yep.

Are marble-floored mansions and luxury hotels on topic ?

Hamas footage is also from a government media...

There's not western press in Northern Gaza and IDF Twitter is not reliable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PC6M0d9euT4

Thanks for you reply. Here's latest combat footage of Hamas in Gaza city from 08/11/2023. video_2023-11-08_19-01-54.mp4

Well, you just confirmed that there were never 1.400 causalities. This was an estimate. The total casualty list is lower than 1.400 victims. Thanks. Case closed.

I've mentioned in my first post that you need to subscribe to Haaretz.. My 683 figure is from 23/10/2023. and this list was available without subscription. Today the figure is 1.149 victims. This is not 1.400 victims as per figures given by Israeli media since the beginning of the conflict.