Thorgal

You're welcome Mr. Neeranam.

Has been answered to BKK Brian. Speculate without proof (as usual) as much as you want in the meanwhile...

I'm waiting for the confirmation of Israeli authorities to confirm that these buildings have been used for military purposes. Hamas sign-up ? I don't know what you mean.

Wrong : https://casebook.icrc.org/case-study/protection-journalists Quote from source : "Protection of media facilities as civilian objects Radio and television facilities are civilian objects and as such enjoy general protection. The prohibition on attacking civilian objects has been firmly established in international humanitarian law since the beginning of the twentieth century and was reaffirmed in 1977 Protocol I and in the Statute of the International Criminal Court." I've just pointed out that this protection of press building and maybe press personnel has not been respected. France requested explanations and has the right to receive for me them if these building have been used by the Palestinians for military purposes. No personal problem for me if Israel wants to continue or extend its PR disaster outside the region to the EU. As usual, you're just guessing without backup. Even the French authorities have no feedback but you're able to "produce" a conclusion... Quote from source : "Loss of protection for civilian objects It clearly follows from the above-mentioned instruments of international humanitarian law that the immunity enjoyed by civilian objects and protected objects is not absolute and that such immunity is lost if these objects are used for hostile purposes. Civilian objects (ships, aircraft, vehicles and buildings) that contain military personnel, equipment or supplies or that in any way make a major contribution to the war effort, incompatible with their status, constitute legitimate targets. [...] For example, if the facilities of the RTS building in Belgrade were really being used as radio relay stations and transmitters by the military and special police forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, the review committee set up by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) was right in concluding that they constituted legitimate military targets for NATO."

AFP (Agence France Press) office in Gaza has been bombed by IDF, together with the buildings of the French Institute (inter-cultural exchange). Macron asks for explanation... We're getting closer to possible Palestinian depopulations from Gaza to Sinai desert. https://www.afp.com/en/agency/press-releases-newsletter/afp-condemns-strike-its-gaza-bureau https://www.france24.com/fr/moyen-orient/20231103-🔴-en-direct-israël-renvoie-les-travailleurs-gazaouis-et-coupe-tout-contact-avec-le-territoire

Antisemitism (etymologic) per definition is racism and all discriminatory behavior applicable on all Semitic populations that speak Semitic languages. Judeophobia is specifically racism and all discriminatory behavior applicable on Jewish population. The term "antisemitism" has been "hijacked" or has been decontextualized wrongly through history as racism and all discriminatory behavior applicable on Jewish population only. The term "antisemitism" has even been further used to denominate all critics against "Israel", "Zionism" or any critics specific related to "Jewishness". Best example I can give you in this topic is the "octopus-case" from Greta Thunberg. The magnifying effect and decontextualization has been over exploited in this case, even if there's no single sign or proof of genuine "Judeophobia". The term "antisemitism" is nowadays more used due to the situation in the Middle East (pogroms, apartheid, bombing, etc...) as an offensive and defensive trigger or smokescreen on social media platforms.

So explain once and for all why bombing pregnant Palestinian women as retaliation is OK when they carry a boy, but they should not be bombed if they carry a girl? Your quote : "The pregnant woman would depend on whether she was having a male child or a female child . If shes having a Female child, then she shouldnt be bombed " https://aseannow.com/topic/1308598-israel-is-at-war/page/201/#comment-18461857

Not true : https://aseannow.com/topic/1308598-israel-is-at-war/page/256/#comment-18473241 My quote was : "The question is not if there are war crimes happening since 7th of October in Gaza, the question is which expertise and reports are required to officialize the variety and severity of these war crimes. My opinion is not a relevant vector in this whole process. It's based on the expertise of the ICC prosecutors and the decision of the ICC judges. Multiple times people ask these non-innocent questions to smear this impartiality to proportions of antisemitism, Hamas lover, etc...just scroll the last 5 pages back and your intellectual honesty will understand that's it's actually a malicious game."

Case closed.

Not true : I've pointed that my opinion is not relevant. The decision is on a legal level by ICC prosecutors and ICC judges. https://aseannow.com/topic/1308598-israel-is-at-war/page/256/#comment-18473241 My quote was : "The question is not if there are war crimes happening since 7th of October in Gaza, the question is which expertise and reports are required to officialize the variety and severity of these war crimes. My opinion is not a relevant vector in this whole process. It's based on the expertise of the ICC prosecutors and the decision of the ICC judges. Multiple times people ask these non-innocent questions to smear this impartiality to proportions of antisemitism, Hamas lover, etc...just scroll the last 5 pages back and your intellectual honesty will understand that's it's actually a malicious game."

Can you prove your statements? Where (of my posts) did you get such conclusions?

I don't see the connection between Tass and your previous post blaming me of being impartial and favoring Hamas crimes. https://aseannow.com/topic/1308598-israel-is-at-war/?do=findComment&comment=18473303 You didn't provide any copy of my posts or snippets on AN to conclude that your findings are on spot and beyond reasonable doubt. Can you prove your statements? Where (of my posts) did you get such conclusions?

I don't see the connection between Tass and your previous post blaming me of being impartial and favoring Hamas crimes. https://aseannow.com/topic/1308598-israel-is-at-war/?do=findComment&comment=18473303 You didn't provide any copy of my posts or snippets on AN to conclude that your findings are on spot and beyond reasonable doubt. Can you prove your statements? Where (of my posts) did you get such conclusions?

You didn't provide any copy of my posts or snippets on AN to conclude that your findings are on spot and beyond reasonable doubt. Can you prove your statements? Where (of my posts) did you get such conclusions?

Can you provide facts of my posts and prove that I've mentioned a possible false flag attack by Israel ? I didn't post such things.

You didn't provide any copy of my posts or snippets on AN to conclude that your findings are on spot and beyond reasonable doubt. Can you prove your statements? Where (of my posts) did you get such conclusions?

Can you provide facts of my posts and prove that I've mentioned a possible false flag attack by Israel ? I didn't post such things.

Can you provide facts of my posts and prove that I'm not impartial? Can you provide facts of my posts and prove that I support the Palestinians and NOT Hamas? Can you provide facts of my posts and prove that I want Israel no more exists and to be replaced by the Palestinians? Can you provide facts of my posts and prove that I was celebrating and cheering Hamas on when they first began the attack?

Can you provide facts to your conclusion? I don't understand where and how you come to that conclusion with what I'm posting.

Victim of what? You can formulate your own findings so that I can better understand you.

The question is not if there are war crimes happening since 7th of October in Gaza, the question is which expertise and reports are required to officialize the variety and severity of these war crimes. My opinion is not a relevant vector in this whole process. It's based on the expertise of the ICC prosecutors and the decision of the ICC judges. Multiple times people ask these non-innocent questions to smear this impartiality to proportions of antisemitism, Hamas lover, etc...just scroll the last 5 pages back and your intellectual honesty will understand that's it's actually a malicious game.

Why (again) a personal attack on me, why on AN as it's just an informative platform to exchange findings on the current conflict in Gaza ? The French NATO general replied that Gaza is "a black hole" for Israel on intel. Your fallacy (attempt) doesn't work to shift the French general his conclusions and findings to me so that I have to answer in his place... If I do answer for him...you gonna ask me to prove it... You've tried this trick multiple times in the past Morch without success. Your quotes: How would the French general know what intel Israel possesses ? How would he know Israel does not have Hamas collaborators/agents/informants?

Hamas application form ? The French NATO general pointed also that IDF intel inside Gaza is very poor. They have no Hamas collaborators and most of the population has no affinity at all with Israel. The 7 October Hamas operation was successful due to stealth (online + underground - lit/fig) operations and trainings. Expecting to find any Hamas online application form is euh...very optimistic...

You're welcome Mr Candide. I've no problem to share this competent and honest man (impartial sometimes) his experience and views here on AN. I've no problem that other posters disagree with me. At least we can agree that we disagree...

I'm glad you still can laugh, or you just forced yourself to mimic a laugh. Posters like me are not accusing Israel of war crimes. Even the French lawyer is not accusing Israel of war crimes... It's only the State of Palestine that can accuse Israel of any war crimes, genocide, ethnic cleansing etc. The ICC prosecutor will have to investigate after 09/11/2023 and the ICC judge will decide much later the verdict, if any. Why always trying to drag AN posters in decisions or conflicts that happen on another level, continent,...