Jump to content

Krataiboy

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    7,685
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Krataiboy

  1. 2 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:

    Better look at this Krataiboy, if you did not read it earlier.  The biggest age group now coming down with Covid is in the under 40's age range and on top of that the scientists are seeing some new things with Covid.

    https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2020-06-26/inside-the-body-the-coronavirus-is-even-more-sinister-than-scientists-had-realized

    Blimey! Scared the living daylights out of me. . . .truly creepy

     

     

    Columbia University microbiologist Stephen P. Goff urged caution in assuming that filopodia are necessarily behaving as a second mode of infecting cells with virus.

    “It’s intriguing and a really cool observation,” Goff said. The study’s striking images show that the filopodia contain a lot of virus and that in the lab, inhibiting their growth seemed to reduce viral replication. This strongly suggests that filopodia are somehow amping up the virus’ ability to infect cells, he acknowledged.

    “But we don’t yet know what stage [of infection] is affected” by the strange protrusions, he said. “It will be great fun to find out.”

     

     

    • Confused 1
  2. 22 minutes ago, robblok said:

    Its only logical, one should even add the deaths normally caused by songkran and the dangerous roads and it is even more.

     

    Face masks works has been proven that they help you NOT spread it. They don't work good for not catching it. That is why others should wear it too and only selfish Tommy Robinson followers like you seem to be against it. 

     

    That masks don't work good if others don't wear it was known its even posted with images in this topic. So don't come up with tests that are not done with that in mind. These tests don't test how much less infections there are if the other person wears them. These tests are test of someone trying to protect them from infection while the other person does not wear them.

     

    Sneezing coughing and all are all limited a lot when you use a mask. So your doing it for someone else his or her safety. 

    Logic is obviously not everybody's strongpoint, so I won't bother asking about the logic of dragging the Tommy Robinson into this debate.

     

    An attempt at guilt by association, maybe?

     

    Do try actually reading the link I posted about masks. It's fairly technical and takes a bit of wading through. But then, as any logical person would agree, effort generally brings its reward. 

    • Like 2
  3. Assuming the virus still around, the draconian measures being taken at newly-opened schools and colleges, while psychologically harmful to the students, will do little to prevent them becoming infected.

     

    All returnees should be tested in situ this week and at regular intervals thereafter, and parents of any infected children provided with quarantine information. Otherwise, many elderly relatives in multi-generation households will be at risk.

  4. 2 hours ago, Sunderland said:

    I hope you realize that seasonal flu probably makes up only about 3-5% of the deaths that you mention. Influenza typically kills about 1,000 - 3,000 people per year in the whole of Brazil.

    According to the latest WHO data published in 2018 Influenza and Pneumonia Deaths in Brazil reached 92,498 or 8.39% of total deaths. The age adjusted Death Rate is 42.68 per 100,000 of population ranks Brazil #76 in the world. 

     

    https://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/brazil-influenza-pneumonia

  5. 2 hours ago, Sujo said:

    Fauci is a politician? I didnt know. But i did my own research by listening to the experts in their field that have spent a lifetime of studying such things.

     

    They are diammetrically opposed to what you say.

    Your really should read what other posters say before attempting to rubbish them. I didn't describe Dr (there's a clue!) Fauci as a politician. I called him a maven, because that is what he is.

     

    It is commendable to research the subject under review for yourself. This is something we all should do, rather than rely what we are told by politicians, mass media and others who may well have a vested interest in not being totally objective or honest.

     

    Those "experts" we look to for help are as divided over various aspects of this pandemic as they are on many other issues (The Kennedy assassination, 9/11, climate change, Black Lives Matter- you name it). So arriving at the truth is, necessarily, a tortuous process.

     

    We probably won't know for sure who is right about the pandemic - or plandemic, or panicdemic, depending on your view - until it has disappeared into history books. Meanwhile, let's keep having these lively and useful debates.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  6. Yesterday, I watched a video clip of some "peaceful protesters" who had invaded a middle class suburb in America. They were chanting something in unison, which I couldn't pick up at first. Then I realised they were shouting, "Eat the rich!"

     

    Nice.

     

    It was gratifying to see in the video Trump published how quickly the baying, intimidating mob backed off, as bullies and cowards generally do in the face of determined opposition.

     

    But one has to ask in both cases: where were the forces of law and order who have a duty to protect as well as serve the public?

  7. "Ordinary people" (I think that means us) rethink the future and find an alternative to the dystopian technocracy being planned for us by corporate/political oligarchies like the United Nations and the World Economic Forum.

     

    The COVID crisis has demonstrated that millions of us in developed countries don't really need to live in, or commute to, crowded, polluted cities, or have our children turned into dumbed-down, compliant little cogs by state educational systems.

     

    I am sure many of us would welcome the chance to move to the countryside and work and educate our children at home. In our spare time we could form a little commune with like-minded neighbours to grow our own food and practice real, old-fashioned sustainability rather than the ersatz kind preached by the UN.

     

    Anything has to be better than this. . .

     

    http://pharos.stiftelsen-pharos.org/global-goals-and-the-global-reset-for-global-technological-control/

     

    • Like 1
  8. 2 hours ago, brain150 said:

    I wonder why ALL countries are constantly talking about this "second wave".

    Reminds me of the underlying WHO Model that goes until end of 2021 with many waves and lock downs to come.

    The model is a complete hoax but the WHO obviously sticks to it.

     

    And isn't it funny that asymptomic people don't spread the virus according to the WHO ?

    And masks don't work ... according to the WHO

    And social distancing works only in bars but not in buses and airplanes

    And the virus likes beaches and bars much more than Restaurants

     

    ... and hospitals are empty !!!

     

    And there is not even a validated Covid-19 PCR test ???

     

    I guess if they tell us about a Som-Tam Pandemic tomorrow, people will also believe it

    Be careful. Using facts, logic and common sense can make you very unpopular in these paranoid times.

     

    Not only is the PCR test unreliable, but the existence of the SARS virus alleged to cause the so-called COVID 19 respiratory disease has yet to be scientifically confirmed.

     

    https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/09/scientists-have-utterly-failed-to-prove-that-the-coronavirus-fulfills-kochs-postulates/

     

     

  9. 13 hours ago, Susco said:

     

    Did I say I had a 30 second attention span?

     

    Wasn't that you who insinuated that, because you couldn't comprehend that I was explaining I couldn't stomach those conspiracy theories longer than that.

     

    That my attention span last much longer is proven by the fact that I managed to read most of the conspiracy drivel you have posted on this forum, which takes ages by the amount of it.

    I'm delighted to hear I have helped flatten your learning curve a little.

  10. 11 hours ago, simon43 said:

    Hence my comment about the non-technical watching YouTube videos... ????

    Cheap shot. I referenced one video, because it dealt with an aspect of 5G which appears to be generally overlooked. My other three sources were all data based, with links to a great deal of technical information. 

     

    One doesn't have to be "technical" (by which you apparently knowing a certain amount about a particular subject) to download, read and understand the reasons why so many scientists, doctors and environments has reservations about 5G.

     

    If, as you suggest in an earlier posting, some of their concerns are groundless, then I for one shall be delighted. In the meantime, just as I defer to your expertise in your particular field, I shall assume these hundreds of scientists, doctors and environmentalists may have a case to answer.

     

    21 hours ago, Susco said:

    They should rename YouTube to the tin foil hat channel.

     

    I really can't watch any YouTube, unless it is music or a live event, for more than 30 seconds

    Obviously, for someone with a thirty second attention span, a tinfoil would be surplus to requirements.

  11. 1 hour ago, simon43 said:

    Of course it is!  If the radiated power level is sufficient.  That's the whole point of industry standard maximum radiation levels.  Bit like a 1.5 volt battery.  You know it's safe to touch the battery terminals, but you also know it's probably fatal to stick your fingers in a 220 volt wall socket.

     

    Sometimes a little knowledge gained from watching YouTube videos is a dangerous thing.....

    Too technical to me. But I'm sure the scientists and doctors who researched the subject and petitioned the UN for a moratorium would be grateful for your expert input.

     

     

  12. 4 hours ago, simon43 said:

    Huh?  Untried technology??!!  As a microwave design engineer, I have been designing and using millimetric transmitters for more than 35 years.  I have yet to grow an extra head or die from brain cancer.....

     

    Funny you should say that.  

     

    The World Health Organisation recognises EMF radiation as a possible human carcinogen.

     

    https://ehtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/Scientist-5G-appeal-2017.pdf

×
×
  • Create New...