sweatalot

10 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

Going to have to ask, as your post is somewhat unclear.

 

Are you saying you doubt this woman's story?

Yes, I doubt this woman's story. She might not know the truth. The reason for being drunk and passing out - and being a willing victim -might not be what she thinks -the drinks she consumed

It might be some knock out drug put into her drink by others with  evil intention

But on the other hand I doubt every woman's story of being raped - if she or the police cannot prove it.

Pretending to be raped is a dangerous and sometimes fatal weapon that allows every woman to bring innocent men into prison and destroy their life. So if she cannot prove it it is no rape. If it can be proved that she lied she has to go to prison. If she can prove it - the rapist has to get punished. 

Unfortunately the law seems to believe every woman's rape story and does not even try to investigate if there a proofs for the womans's allegation or if the man might be innocent.

2 hours ago, DM07 said:

Wow! I have read some disgusting 5h1t on here, but this is way up there with the "best"!
What a sad and bitter person you must be!


Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

You are so wrong. There are a lot of alleged rape. German statistics say it might be over 50 %. It is so easy for a woman to pretend being raped and get innocent men into prison. If you dont' believe me I can give you plenty of sources (unfortunately in German) Nut I don't believe women in other countries are much different,

1 hour ago, OldBag said:

No matter how often women are told to stay sober, to stay away from strange men, to buddy up, to dress conservatively, women are raped. Even when women say “no,” women are raped. They are raped when they don’t say “no” too.

There are ways that rape can be prevented, though and they have absolutely nothing to do with a woman’s dress or her behavior. The only people who can prevent rape are men. A meme that’s going viral across social media shows a list of “Ten Rape Prevention Tips” that are sure to stop rape dead in its tracks. If every single man followed these tips, there would be no more rape.

1. Don’t put drugs in women’s drinks.

2. When you see a woman walking by herself, leave her alone.

3. If you pull over to help a woman whose car has broken down, remember not to rape her.

4. If you are in an elevator and a women gets in, don’t rape her.

5. When you encounter a woman who is asleep, the safest course of action is to not rape her.

6. Never creep into a woman’s home through an unlocked door or window, or spring out at her from between parked cars, or rape her.

7. Remember, people go to the laundry room to do their laundry. Do not attempt to molest someone who is alone in a laundry room.

8. Use the Buddy System! If it is inconvenient for you to stop yourself from raping women, ask a trusted friend to accompany you at all times.

9. Carry a rape whistle. If you find that you are about to rape someone, blow the whistle until someone comes to stop you.

10. Dont forget: Honesty is the best policy. When asking a woman out on a date, don’t pretend that you are interested in her as a person; tell her straight up that you expect to be raping her later. If you don’t communicate your intentions, the woman may take it as a sign that you do not plan to rape her.

Absolute and utter rubbish. It is concerned only with the minority of men who want to rape - and they will no way comply to this "rules". These rules are made by malign feminist women who hate all men. The purpose is not to protect women from being raped. The purpose is to put men down.

It is a defamation of the male sex and opens the door to get every man into prison if one of the multitude of malign women decide to do so.

Obviously the poster believes every man is a potential rapist - that's what the men hating feminists are trying to put into the common believe system in order to continue suppressing the men.

1 hour ago, 6thST said:

Ladies,you have to be more careful.This can be a dangerous city.

 

and the cause of your being drunk might not be the alcohol that you consume

9 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

Defence tactic number 1 from the rapist charter.

proved rape ...

there might be injuries that would show there was no consent

(even this could be abused (for instance by te infamous malign German woman Claudia Dinkel who planned to have her ex lover in jail for pretended rape) .. and she only failed because her victim could afford expensive lawyers and expert witnesses who could prove her injuries were self inflicted

another thing to mention about the Aussie woman - maybe somebody put k.o. drops into her drink .... to make the planned rape easy

new dim3nwion of  unbelievavbility and utter failurr

now the need a really

good idea to save their face

SWAT or nukes come to mind

Merkel should use this as an example

police will decide when to arrest Dhammachayo:

555555555555

and I thought more face loss would be impossible

11 hours ago, waldroj said:

It's hard to feel sorry for the protagonists (Jatuporn, and Prayut and his cronies) in this particular "battle" for the hearts and minds of the Thai people.

 

For Jatuporn it's a question of his freedom (because, he "... missed his wife and children so much...").

 

But for Prayut, it must be enough to make him want to bang his head against the wall - a decision where he is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't !!!

 

Does he intercede so this "thorn in his side" can gain his freedom, or does he keep him locked-up and risk this becoming martyrdom ???

 

"... risk this becoming martyrdom ... "

He cannot become a martyr because by now most of the Thai public will have understood that his goal never was to help the people

His goal was to pile up riches by becoming another populist in a populist's mercenary army that had the purpose to rob the country

I don't understand why he should be bailed out

I don't understand why he thinks he should get bail

and

I don't understand why Nattawut is still free

good that the police is doing their job in a case of gang assault

would be really nice if  they decide to make this the standard procedure in every such case, no matter who  the victim is

3 hours ago, hanuman2543 said:

They can test her hair for drug use. How far back depends on the length of the hairs. That will even work when all metabolites left her body long ago. Standard drug test will show the use of meth approximately one week after the last use.

now I understand why jenpop became a monk - as an excuse to cut his hair

"their jobs are being stolen ..."

interesting world view

how can a job be stolen ?

competition is either more qualified or they do the same job for less money

So the police condemned him because of some people accusing him.

Did they check if those people had a motive?

And they just drop in his house and do what they want.

Plenty of opportunity to plant whatever evidence they want to find.

There should always be a lawyer in such an action to protect the accused's rights.

I don't dare to imagine if the police would appear in my house - no rights (and no reason for sure)

13 hours ago, lemonjelly said:

Brave lady, wish her the best.


Sent from my twisted mind using Thaivisa Connect

Thailand needs more of her kind

8 hours ago, DavidVincent said:

A bit like Military/PM then...but when it comes to the greens it seems OK

but, but, but the PM ....

stay with the topic

.. another deadline

did the passenger say he felt unconscious?

what happened to the bar owner?

Nothing?

9 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

 

Giving free money away without even working for it must surely qualify as the mother of all populism. 

so every government that has a welfare program is populistic?

but if Prayuth starts some  kind of welfare - it must be populistic ?

No excuse any more for the DSI to not arrest him now

Of course PTP (the masters of selling their get rich themselves schemes as help for the people) does not want another government doing good for the people

I agree with the Dalai Lama. Seeing things negative, expecting negative things, will only result in more of those.

political correct or not - why not remove anybody who from their ethnicity, religion or behavior might be a terror risk?

Their are peoples in that region who have been living their for centuries without terror attacks from their side. They need protection

Risk?

What risk?