Benmart

26 minutes ago, nobodysfriend said:

Better he pleads guilty to all points .

It all could have been done much better than he and his " crew members " , did .

But , of course , he will deny it all and find excuses or somebody or something else to blame . He's a politician , after all ...

He's a General masquerading as a politician.

Repeating past greedy behavior and expecting different results. A failure in the making.

Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.

I'm sure that the unemployed, destitute, homeless and struggling businesses will take great comfort in seeing money spend on repairing beaches without people, which in all likelihood, will again be washed out to sea.

Numbers and statistics are puddy which can be manipulated for any agenda. The current lot at the helm have had years to fabricate and corrupt anything they see as useful to control the masses. This latest adventure fits in nicely towards that aim.  Time shall reveal the real story.

Fake news.

The question by the OP is pointless. What others are doing does not remove my responsibility to comply with a law, regardless if I agree with it or not. The defense for non-compliance is weak when using the behavior of others as justification.

This rag is from Xinhua News Agency headquartered out of Beijing. 

TAT is redundant and nothing more than dreamers at this stage.

Eye candy and a money maker under the table. The foot paths are a shambles, stop signs bleached white by the sun or blocked from view, wires hanging and concrete poles leaning from the shear weight of the cable madness, screaming scooters/motorcycles with modified mufflers, no mobile traffic enforcement and on and on. Eye candy does nothing to address the ills of this dying city.

11 hours ago, ramrod711 said:

I'm not sure about the "sandbox", I hear it can be murder.

Tasteless. Any murder, including your's, is not a basis for humour.

1 hour ago, Gottfrid said:

And a "wealth" of 104 million baht is something for the news because of what? There are many persons in Thailand with that amount. Nothing to lift any eye brows over. Just let the guy be.

Public Servants are a bit different than private citizens. Access to public money, unchecked power, opportunities for corruption, nepotism and other irregularities are reason for disclosure and verification. There is but one Chief of the RTP and he supposedly works for the people who seemingly,  are entitled to that information by Thai Law. 

3 hours ago, Rampant Rabbit said:

Doubt it was her  only debt, those seeking money often  borrow  from anyone stupid  enough to lend it.

Lots of stupid around, and some tapped out on keyboards.

No shortage of critics who most likely have never spoken to this women. Plenty of scolds saying "she should have", when most likely they are not paying her way in life. Anyone have cancer and in a similar condition? Please speak up.

The usual bar-stool comments. A lady has been serious injured during a violent domestic disturbance and some creatures use this as a platform for their juvenile comments. Truly sad.