candide

What I have mentioned are facts. BTW very damning about what, exactly?

What a joke! Jim Jordan was caught lying about it by editing the testimony! 😀 Here's the unedited part of the testimony in which Morrel replies to Jim Jordan. https://www.politicususa.com/2023/04/21/jim-jordan-just-got-busted-with-evidence-of-his-hunter-biden-lies.html/amp

No. Agents represent their administration, not ex-agents. And it did actually present earmarks of Russian disinformation: laptop content brought up by Giuliani, known for his contacts with Russian agents in Ukraine; copy of laptop given only to the NYPost shortly before the election, so no one could check it, etc.... It looks like Giuliani had done all he could to suggest it was a Russian disinformation. 😀

Ex-agents and what they wrote is not what you claimed they said in your previous post.

They were not agents and it's not what they said.

It's Putin making nuclear threats.

Nash! He will be protected by the Aryan brotherhood. Welcome dear brother!!

I already commented about it. They are not sued for reporting to the police, they are sued for diffusing the whole content to the public.

That's not the problem. He has the right, and even the duty, to inform the police, as in the case of Gary Glitter. Hunter doesn't not sue them for reporting to the police, he sues them for diffusing the content to the public. They have no right to diffuse the whole content of the laptop, in particular the most personal parts. Even if he may own the laptop, he doesn't own the content.

I did not miss the fact that the comparison used was irrelevant to Hunters case.

Sure! Lend me your computer and I will put the content on the Internet! 😃

More B.S.

The usual B.S......

MAGAs are so pathetic! They cannot get Joe Biden because they have no evidence, so they lash out at Hunter! Kind of consolation prize... 😆

Which childporn did the repairman find?

Why? They stated that It “has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.” It was true. Who could have trusted a copy of a laptop content, provided by Giuliani (😃), known for his contacts with Russian agents in Ukraine, a copy that no one except the NYPost could obtain and check.

Blah blah again. No one gave money to Biden and got classified information in exchange. And there is no classified information in the book. You are completely incohent. 😀

Hur commented about Biden being motivated by pride and money. Where did he say he sold classified documents? Nowhere. Espionage! Complete B.S. It was about his personal (written) notebooks (according to Hur's report) A lot of blah blah and obfuscation. Why can't you answer this simple question? Who gave money to Joe and received classified classified information in exchange? - not the ghost writer (he works for Biden and is paid by Biden), - not the publisher: according to Hur, there is no classified information in the book (a book about Beau Biden, BTW), - not the readers (no classified information in the book). No one gave money and received classified information in exchange. Biden did not sell it to anyone. You (Jim Jordan) are making things up again! 😀

Lol! This ridiculous and incoherent claim from Jim Jordan! Of course, you believe this proven liar. 😀 Let's start with the basics. When you sell something, you give it to someone else, who give you money in exchange. So who gave him money and received classified information in exchange? You have nothing as usual! Edit: where is it written that Hur said that Biden sold classified information?

Lol! Trump and the Republicans have been trying to get Joe or Hillary for years. Which evidence have they found? Zero, zilch, nada, waloo! BTW, you are just as uninformed as your pal who claimed they were 51 FBI officials (lol! You should at least agree together on lies before publishing them on AN). They were not CIA officials, and they stated it had all the earmarks of Russian disinformation!

Ooops! Sorry, I did not get it. I read your post too quickly.

Another B.S.! It's not what the Republican special counsel said!

You don't seem to know what you are talking about. They were not FBI agents. The non-FBI agents said it has all the earmarks of Russian disinformation (which it actually had, BTW).

FD-1023 anyone? You have nothing. 😀

What are you talking about? Which president did what I indicated in my post (with details)? You have nothing.