candide

"It was all about attacking Russia via Ukraine"

She lost! 🤣

Suuure! 50% population growth in 4 years! 🤣 You should stop making yourself ridiculous, Bignok!

Blah blah. You have nothing.🤣

Another way to say you have nothing...🙂

In summary, you also have nothing...🙂

Blah blah again... you still have nothing! 😆

Blah blah.. 3 million less voters between the 2020 (158) and the 2024 (155) elections is not huge. It's less than 2% of the total number of voters The Dems lost 6 million votes, Trump took 3 millions votes, and 3 million did not vote. You have no point....😆

She got 75 million votes. But don't let facts get in the way of a good MAGA conspiracy theory! 🤣 https://www.bbc.com/news/election/2024/us/results

I don't have to disprove something which wasn't proven to happen! 😋 BTW, not that huge. 3 million less voters in 2024 compared to 2020. The Dems lost 6 million votes. From these 6 million, Trump got 3 million more votes, and 3 million did not vote this time.

You are just confirming you have no credibility....

You talking about credibility....

The Russians have several times publicly stated what their conditions were. If I remember well, it was the annexion of Donbass and Donestk (not only the occupied part), a demilitarised Ukraine and also a regime change. If this was the offer, it's not surprising that Ukraine was not keen to negotiate under these terms.

What were exactly the terms or Russian conditions of this "offer"?

It's not really the problem. NATO countries' armies have been trained to operate together. They use the same protocols and weapons are interoperable. That's the aim of NATO: to be able to operate under united command. The real problem is that, as recalled many times, there isn't enough weapon production capacity, and it cannot be fixed on short-term. The other is that without the U.S., there are 'holes' in the system which also cannot be filled on short-term. For example, logistics or electronic intelligence. Not to mention nuclear weapons, which are meant to protect only two countries (despite Macron's speech).

And Trump cannot wear such shoes because of his bone spurs! 🤣

Something like this https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/06/european-led-ukraine-air-protection-plan-could-halt-russian-missile-attacks

Trump eliminating corruption! That's laughable.

And Russia keeps invading its neighbours....

If you were not just parroting MAGA propaganda, you would know that actually very few fentanyl comes from Canada!

No need to put troops on the ground to start with An airshield could be provided on most of Ukraine, without being inside Ukraine. It would be a significant help to Ukraine.

In particular when the U.S. is led by Trump!

Why do you have the same trolling m.o. as Mogandave. Are you in couple, or do you have more than one ID?

Are you able not to troll? 😆

it's not money spent "on NATO".