RSD1

A sad and sorry state of affairs. Thoughts and prayers.

Just avoid marrying the bar girls all together, period. Thank me later.

Two tarts stacked on top of each other. Best set of smashed burgers you could ever imagine.

Because many men are greatly turned on by having a big wet growler shoved in their mouth.

I think it's clear why the women do it. They're lazy, they want an easy life, they don't want to be forced to continue to sleep with a variety of men that they don't wanna be with, and they're looking for a larger sum of money than they get from working on a daily basis. So it seems like a small sacrifice for them to be around an older man all the time that they don't care for in exchange for forgetting everything else out of life that they ever wanted. To me the bigger question is why do the men go for it when clearly they are in a position where they have more and better options? Why do the men choose these girls from poor villages and dysfunctional family background where the women are often drunk, angry, loud, combative types who have lots of tattoos, no education, that believe in ghosts and superstition, and who will usually give you the worst advice on how to handle any situation in Thailand because they are from a lower socioeconomic class and simply don't have any experience or know any better.

Yes, that’s you, but one size doesn’t fit all. If you read the OP, he’s comparing going short-time versus having someone he can call on to fulfill that need more regularly. In both cases, he’s not really looking for a relationship though. A deeper relationship is not what some people need. Not everyone values the caring, companionship, understanding, or familiarity that comes with having a long term female partner. For some, a temporary human touch is enough, and in this case, it’s purely about the human touch and no more. The only question is how best to go about getting only that.

I'm confused, I thought the tart was the ham sandwich and that her smoking your doobie is normally a standard part of the service? Farting is also useful to get them to leave.

Tyson clearly knew he shouldn't have gotten in the ring. He just posted this on his Instagram.

For many the money isn't the real consideration. It's the variety, freedom, and no grief aspects mentioned in the OP that draws many into that ST lifestyle exclusively. Also, there will be times a GF may not be in the mood, or the painters might be in town, all potential cockblock events. But with ST that's never a problem.

Going down is relatively low risk. Many men are also now on PrEP, which prevents HIV transmission. Much less risk now without condom.

I've seen that so many times in Thailand. Such a common and repeating narrative. But it's usually no more than five years until the man regrets the mistake that he made.

Depends. If the happy ending at the end of a massage is just a herky-jerky, then no, that's not usually considered ST. That's a rub and a tug. Proper ST involves throwing the girl the bone and then letting Rover take over.

Short-time is a standard of one hour in most cases. Has been that way for decades.

Spoken like an expert.

Since you are into really into Thai tattoos, you could get one just like him that says "I had sex with a ladyboy." https://www.koreaboo.com/stories/tourist-wakes-thailand-unknowingly-sexual-tattoo-chest/

No, that's not short time. Short time is great though. Kudos to whoever invented it.

Rigged! Hoax!! Fixed!!!

Anecdotal garbage from a clinic selling treatments for erectile dysfunction. This isn't from a respected medical journal nor are there any peer reviewed studies.

But you are still kicking. So it is always an option!

And she cleans out your tubes too. Another thing that GG is forced to do by himself, alone, and single handedly.

Absolutely, no objection or disagreement with that conclusion.

This topic isn’t about erectile dysfunction.

Paul had stepped on his foot, which triggered the slap. It is mentioned here: https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/sports/he-must-die-jake-paul-mike-tyson-slap/5987243/

I do believe too much sex of any kind (real, porn, masturbation, etc) can result in over saturation and make it more difficult to reach orgasm. All this stuff you are talking about are all sideshows from the real issue. They may be real issues for some people, but unlikely to be an issue for someone who is functioning normally in every other way. So if you normally ejaculate between 1-3 times per day, and then reduce that to once every 3 days then that will probably fix most of ones problems with being able to ejaculate. You can forget about death grip too much porn and all that stuff. That's not the problem. If somebody can masturbate to porn or masturbate to anything and still reach orgasm then they don't have a real problem. As I said, I think it's an issue of frequency. If somebody can still get normal erection, still feels aroused, and still enjoys sex, but simply can't cum without a lot of difficulty, then most likely it's just an issue of frequency. So the bigger question is this. If somebody is used to having sex and/or reaching orgasm 1-3 times per day, and then they want to cut back on that to say once every three days, then how do they do it? That is the bigger challenge, isn't it? Just like trying to cut down on over eating, drinking, cigarettes, weed or anything else that you are trying to reduce your dependence upon. That's why I mentioned sexual addiction earlier.

I didn't see any mention in the OP about drinking alcohol at all.