![](https://assets.aseannow.com/forum/uploads/set_resources_40/84c1e40ea0e759e3f1505eb1788ddf3c_pattern.png)
Caps
-
Posts
1,302 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Caps
-
-
37 minutes ago, tonbridgebrit said:
I would like to say. Looking at all the xenophobic and anti-immigrant comments here, I am ashamed to be British.
In America, a democratic vote took Mr Trump to the White House. Donald Trump hinted and implied a whole load of measures that were, in my opinion, xenophobic and anti-immigration. Lot's of people reckoned these ideas were silly and foolish. But, looking at the comments here, I really wonder, do lots of people support such silly and foolish ideas ?
Maybe, Trump's victory was not surprising at all. How many people want to keep the "foreigners" out ? How many people genuinely, or secretly, supported Trump's xenophobic and anti-immigrant views ? Looks like, that loads of people in America and Europe share Trump's views.That would depend on what type of foreigners....if you are talking about families who want to come into, lets say the UK, and work, pax taxes and contribute to the country then I dont have a drama, if you are talking about the thousands of single fighting age men (vermin) coming into the country hopeing to get free board and lodging or the people that come in and dont want to live as we do and preach hate and want to bring there backward ways then NO not at all, keep them all out
-
6 hours ago, pgrahmm said:
But thankfully they are not US states so the facts are quite irrelevant
-
11 hours ago, Baerboxer said:
How many years were you there?
If i were to hazard a guess I would say he did None. Its far better/safer/easier being a keyboard warrior. Having worked with the RUC very closely in the 3.5 years I spent there I found them to be very professional and brave doing a difficult job and I worked with catholics in the RUC
-
I see the plan of making america great again is working really well, especially if it meant alienating all other countries and getting them to forge new and possibly better alliances
-
18 minutes ago, tonbridgebrit said:
Look, the anti-foreigner and anti-Muslim sentiments we see here are a bit silly. The above picture, is of a Muslim bird called Haleema Butt. This Muslim lady has been sacked from her job at Heathrow Airport, because her brother was involved in a terrorist act in Britain. Haleema is a stunningly beautiful lady. Does Europe really want to stop women, who look like her from entering Europe ?
Off-couse not.If her brother has been involved in terrorist acts, who is to say that she could not become involved and having access to Heathrow is not really the best thing. Especially if she had air side clearance. The security of thousands of people is far more important than her job
-
Just now, eezergood said:
then walk away.........
in your infinate wisdom...why?
-
Just now, melvinmelvin said:
maybe so,
but they just might do better in the north of UK than in the middle east and afg.
debatable
-
Maybe the US should sort out its own problems before butting its nose into others countries.
-
1 hour ago, ilostmypassword said:
And what makes the hypocrisy of the critics of Juncker here so blatant is that he was reproaching the MEPs for not respecting a small nation. Which is just the opposite of what his critics would have you believe are his true sentiments.
Thanks for pointing out the obvious point in the Op
-
have a look at the Isuzu Mu7
-
Juncker tells near-empty EU parliament: 'You are ridiculous'
These could be the most sensible words Juncker has ever spoken
-
I am sure the govenment wont wake up and realise people are getting fed up of their countries being used as free board and lodgings
-
6 hours ago, ilostmypassword said:
Language reminiscent of that which was used in Europe about 80 years ago.
I aint interested, preach to someone who is
-
well done Austria, although a bit late to the party, keep the pressure on italy then hopefully it will close its ports and impound all the ships used to bring the vermin in
-
That's big of them
-
as per the above ^^
-
Its got naff all to do with the UK and US. Keep you nose out where it aint warranted (and I am a Brit)
-
2 minutes ago, stephen tracy said:
No they don't. Sex-tourists that marry a hooker normally end up in remote Issan villages whinging about something or other on TV.
Not all Issan women are/or become hookers
-
What an awesome idea...close the ports then maybe they will start to get towed back to North African coast and not to the EU.
-
Wow, another story from the religion of peace......oh, sorry wrong group, same outcome
-
14 minutes ago, champers said:
It was everything to do with protection - from Soviet expansion and from the internal strife that followed WW1 and led to WW2.
Ok, i thought its was after the defeat of the Germans in WW2, the allied powers asserted their authority over all territories. The four powers, Britain, France, US and Russia divided Germany into four occupation zones for administrative purposes, into what is collectively known now as Allied Occupied Germany. Maybe later it was more about protection.
-
Just now, RuamRudy said:
Would that really be so bad, now that the current government has set the precedent of getting into bed with terrorist supporters?
Yes i know, it was a bit of sarcasm, hence the coffee
-
2 hours ago, Retiredandhappyhere said:
According to Corbyn, May has no mandate. Well, someone should remind him that her party still managed 56 more MPs than his motley Labour crew. Exactly with whom would he collaborate to form a Government?
As always in the past, Labour just wants to spend, spend, spend......other peoples' money.
He could form a government with some of his Sinn Fein (IRA) buddies or even the that non terrorist group ISIS
-
1 hour ago, champers said:
She wants to be considered as the leader of the free world. Germany should not forget who protected their country after WW2 and who invested to rebuild her industry and infrastructure.
who did protect Germany after WW2?
I think you might find that Russia, UK, French and the US occupied Germany and it was nothing to do with protection
Four Arab states leading Qatar boycott say initial demands void, vow more measures
in World News
Posted · Edited by Caps
spelling
So..what with the billions of dollars of fighter jets to Qatar and the 100 billion plus weapons deal to the Saudis is looks like the US is supporting all types of terrorism