Bkk Brian

If I want to bring up "facts," I do usually post a link. Noted. I'll wait for some proof on that when you claim any facts in future posts

More of your alternative reality, facts can be backed up with evidence and links, your fantasies cannot

No. I stick to facts. Not your fantasies

Rubbish. The Guardian article you refer to does not say he is sacked at all. In addition. You are reading too much disinformation on social. It’s Not True’ – Ukraine’s Defense Ministry Responds to Reports That Zaluzhny Has Been Fired https://www.kyivpost.com/post/27339

There is of course the conditions of release of all hostages, Hamas leaders removed, terror infrastructure dismantled. There is a new topic on it here actually with Cameron's full transcript on his proposal better than cherry picked bullet points by the apologists. Foreign Secretary David Cameron writes on how to solve the Gaza crisis https://aseannow.com/topic/1318495-foreign-secretary-david-cameron-writes-on-how-to-solve-the-gaza-crisis

Off topic, nothing to do with UN Agency Staff Involvement in Hamas Attacks

Can you tell your freedom fighters that the families are waiting...........the ICJ has demanded their immediate release. Oh wait, the freedom fighters don't care and are mocking with a sick video to prove it.

Nah there is no context to label them freedom fighters and those that try to make that case are pretty sick

I love the way you tell me what my intentions are...... Back in the real world I stick to the facts. Who are these war crime deniers?

They back designating a terror group terrorists because of the terror attacks they commit.

Of course, Hamas love to call themselves freedom fighters but that does not make it so. They have been delegated terrorists by numerous countries for very good reasons.

Why do I get a sense of deja vue? don't know why? You got that link on the "irrefutable evidence of a war crime" in the incident yet?

Numerous times actually, here's one

Really, can you provide evidence to that, ICJ did not otherwise they would have insisted on a ceasefire. Still for someone who calls Hamas freedom fighters I expected nothing else

Your opinion is not supported by IHL International Humanitarian Law "IHL allows for the killing of civilians when militarily necessary, subject to the principles of distinction and proportionality."

Pathetic, I have no need to discuss anything, you have a need to deflect because you know you have no link to back up your ridiculous claims again.

Link to the war crime? You have not provided evidence to this war crime. What war crime? 3 terrorists were killed, no civilians were injured.

Rubbish, since when do you make the rules here? Wasting my time so get back to me when you have a link to your claim. Every poster could use perfidy as their disclaimer and never provide links again. Time to come back down to earth

No off topic deflection. Nothing to do with provided links to claims. Very dishonest way to deflect.

You do understand you are just deflecting from the plain facts of not providing a link to your claim of this incident being a war crime.

"In factual areas such as news forums and current affairs topics member content that is claimed or portrayed as a fact should be supported by a link to a relevant reputable source." You know the rules, I am waiting for a link not your off topic nonsense on the meaning of perfidy

ditto below

Read the quotes and links to my posts. I provide links unlike your false claims then deflect with nonsense