Bkk Brian

Off topic and just to be clear. There have not been 26000 innocents slaughtered.

Interesting that "you" maintain that. Have you been in private consultations with Hamas, not even the terrorist listed that as a reason in the "publicity" released report on their reasons. https://aseannow.com/topic/1317750-hamas-oct-7-was-necessary-normal-response-to-israeli-conspiracies

What on earth has that got to do with the hostages held by Hamas? Some sick attempt to make a comparison?

You need hostage both sides for that, there are only one set of hostages and they are stuck deep inside dark tunnels being sexually abused, those that haven't been murdered that is.

Conspiracy nonsense, a sick attempt to minimize the terrible atrocities and blame Israel for the massacre

Yes this has been gone over repeatedly in previous topics, you've championed this many times, but its off topic here, read the OP. Here is the topic. More genocidle attacks by Hamas shown to ICJ Footage recorded by a Hamas terrorist go-pro camera shows him approaching a civilian home, shooting a woman, hearing her scream in agony, and then shooting her again.

If the terrorists remain their genocidal attacks will continue. A clip shown to the ICJ Footage filmed by a Hamas terrorist on his cell phone shows him and another terrorist taking a child hostage by force as he cries and tries to leave

You can imagine I said that but I said this: The October 7 'genocide' video evidence in full https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13005021/october-genocide-evidence-video-slaughtered-mutilated-hamas-terrorist-israel.html

Yes Oct 7th was one. Read the topic,

Crystal ball now, if that happens and they make such a specific claim such as "He was killed as part of a genocide." I will also call them out on the rules of this forum.

More nonsense. Your constant refusal to provide a link to specific claims such as "He was killed as part of a genocide." is the problem, if we all did that this forum would be chaos. There are rules, expect to be called out if you don't keep to them.

I hope to see plenty of discussion from you, never seem many links though;

I can connect deflection to..............

You made a specific claim and you cannot back it despite being asked to several times. "He was killed as part of a genocide." 5. You will not use ASEAN NOW to post any material which is knowingly or can be reasonably construed as false, inaccurate, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise in violation of any law. Topics or posts deemed to be scaremongering, deliberately misleading or which deliberately distort information will be removed. In factual areas such as news forums and current affairs topics member content that is claimed or portrayed as a fact should be supported by a link to a relevant reputable source.

That's not a link to your claim, the links to his death have already been posted. Where is the link that he was killed as part of genocide

Read the OP

We also know that when they first invaded and press were there filming it, those press who were contracted by major media outlets were also terrorist sympathizers who must have known in advance what was going to happen. Video of these sick so called photojournalists laughing in the article below EXPOSED: Gaza Photojournalists Shared Call to Infiltrate Israel on Oct. 7 A Gaza photojournalist working for international media called on residents of the coastal enclave to cross the border into Israel on October 7, after Hamas terrorists had breached it, an HonestReporting investigation has found. Mohammed Fayq Abu Mostafa, a freelancer who has been working for Reuters, made the comments while excitedly displaying footage of Hamas atrocities on an Instagram Live hosted in Gaza by another photojournalist, Ashraf Amra. Amra has been working for AP, Reuters and APA Images, as well as for Turkish agency Anadolu. The investigation also found Amra had been honored with kisses by Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh on two previous occasions. https://honestreporting.com/exposed-gaza-photojournalists-shared-call-to-infiltrate-israel-on-oct-7/

More wild imagination and assumptions, no I rely on the information to hand, the OP, something you obviously don't read before making unsubstantiated claims again, I even gave you a clue in my last post to read it. Terminating a contract does not constitute an investigation, that's still to come. So link or retract. "UNRWA Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini expressed shock at the accusations and swiftly took action by terminating the contracts of the implicated staff members. He emphasized the importance of conducting a thorough investigation to determine the truth behind the allegations, stating, "Any UNRWA employee who was involved in acts of terror will be held accountable, including through criminal prosecution."

Link to your claim or retract it

Why not read the OP before making comments. Now a link to that claim is still needed. "U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, emphasizing the need for a speedy and comprehensive investigation."

They already investigated. You keep making these claims, link to that investigation?

Yes move the goal posts then, all known suspects where as before you claimed: That is what the investigation is for.

Rubbish, it supports the stance and views taken by all the other western countries, the rest is your imagination. How do you know they have all the culprits?

Exactly: "It’s not bad apples. It’s a rotten barrel." https://twitter.com/EylonALevy/status/1751373518149656874

Where did I imagine there won't be?