Bkk Brian

I tried that, he failed on 3 of them and is still rolling...

I dispute that there was any conclusion that disavows that Israel has committed gross war crimes and can fairly be described as ... war criminals.

I don't need to go to wiki, read the law from the link I posted: The rules of LOAC provide some protections for civilians, but civilians can lawfully be killed in war. The LOAC principle of distinction prohibits attacks directed against civilians, meaning it is unlawful to intentionally target civilians. Civilians, however, may be incidentally harmed or killed in attacks directed at military objectives. The LOAC principle of proportionality only prohibits attacks against military objectives if the attack is expected to cause incidental harm to civilians or civilian objects that would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated. Thus, the principle of proportionality implicitly authorizes the knowing or foreseeable (but not intentional) killing of civilians in certain circumstances. Indeed, the ratio of civilian to combatant deaths has increased over the past century, particularly with the advent of aerial warfare, the development of more destructive weapons, and the urbanization of societies.

No need. "to carry out attacks against military objectives with the knowledge that civilians will be killed"

Collateral damage is an accepted consequence of warfare. The law of armed conflict (LOAC) permits soldiers to carry out attacks against military objectives with the knowledge that civilians will be killed, provided the attack is consistent with the requirements of the principle of proportionality. https://lieber.westpoint.edu/collateral-damage-innocent-bystanders-war/

Of course they new some civilians may get killed, but also as with the rules of war, its the proportionality as to how many, we don't know how many terrorists were also killed.

Your still claiming without evidence it was a targeted deliberate act to kill all those civilians and the outcome was entirely predictable. There is nothing in your links to back up those claims "Huge lie. Dropping bombs on a refugee camp is knowingly, willingly and deliberately killing civilians. The fact that hundreds of civilians were killed and that the outcome was entirely predictable makes it deliberate."

Your claim: "Huge lie. Dropping bombs on a refugee camp is knowingly, wilingly and deliberately killing civilians. The fact that hundreds of civilians were killed and that the outcome was entirely predictable makes it deliberate."

You are not getting away with your unsubstantiated claims. Links to those needed

a meme..........your on a roll down the tunnels

That's not how it works, you need to provide evidence of you claims, regards war crimes that another subject that needs evidence, trial and convictions

Links troll not more pathetic deflection

More lies from you, here are your claims again: Provide a link that contains evidence to a targeted strike that killed 100's of civilians, also when doing it please take note that the terrorists do not wear uniforms all the time and blend in with the civilains. After you've done that, you've still got your comparison to deliberately killing 6 million Jews to evidence

Did you read all 321?

Possibly but doubtful, Hamas figures: Have you factored in: - Now over 600 Hamas rockets verified as having misfired and landed back in Gaza and landing in civilian areas - The hundred if not thousands of Hamas terrorists already killed by IDF as they claim, those figure are not separated from the figures Hamas run health authority issues. - Hamas claimed at first 800 killed by IDF hospital car park strike. That figure was then reduced to 500 or so and it turned out to be a Hamas rocket not IDF

You've got a lot of back tracking to do to supply links to your claims, currently zero received yet you lamely attempt to criticize video evidence footage. You have nothing troll

IDF Spokesman Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari briefed international media outlets with video footage of Hamas gunmen emerging from a tunnel under Sheikh Hamad Hospital, as well firing at Israelis forces from within the building itself. https://www.timesofisrael.com/idf-releases-new-intel-detailing-hamas-use-of-gaza-hospitals-for-terror-purposes/

That is not a link to your claims and you know it troll

Nah you're lying again. No links provided by you

Now your just trolling and a liar:

When you get back to me with links of your claims we can carry on a debate, until then you have zero credibility

Still waitng for your previous links, while I'm waiting digest this Collateral damage is an accepted consequence of warfare. The law of armed conflict (LOAC) permits soldiers to carry out attacks against military objectives with the knowledge that civilians will be killed, provided the attack is consistent with the requirements of the principle of proportionality. https://lieber.westpoint.edu/collateral-damage-innocent-bystanders-war/

You made specific claims not opinions, I am waiting

Whatever links, waiting