Bkk Brian

"Capitol hill protest" It was an attack on Capitol Hill and attack on democracy itself but you must have missed that. Many of those already convicted have directly accused Trump as the reason they took part. In July 2023, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington published an analysis showing that 174 defendants said they believed they were following Trump's request. "Another rioter stated in her guilty plea that she marched on the Capitol specifically after hearing Trump encourage Pence to "do the right thing."[87] In April 2022, a defense lawyer for one of the rioters told jurors that Trump had been "using his position to authorize this assault."[88]" Pamela Hemphill pled guilty to demonstrating in a Capitol building. In May 2022, she was sentenced to 60 days in jail and 36 months' probation. In 2023, Trump publicly claimed her sentence was harsh. In response, she tweeted: "I pleaded guilty because I was guilty!" She told reporters: "It's a struggle trying to get away from gaslighting, Trump's narcissism and all the tactics they use... It was scary to leave the cult." Not surprising that the NAACP have initiated this lawsuit considering that Trump election lawsuits targeted areas with large Black, Latino populations. You are aware that there are also Police Officers who have filed lawsuits?

Reading your recent rants on here I doubt you've got the capability of examining any evidence provided since its already been posted multiple times. Where have you read that "Most of the hype is we are all going to die if something isn’t done right now!!" ??

The cult on full show............................

I suggest you re read your own link from Law.com "A loose coalition of conspiracy theorists, libertarians and conservative groups have gone after those who have provided fact-checks used to counter misleading claims circulating on sites such as Facebook and TikTok" “They make a point of going after the fact-checkers because, in addition to stopping regulation, they also want to prevent or discourage climate scientists from doing things that might educate the public,” said Lauren Kurtz, executive director at the Climate Science Legal Defense Fund. Climate Feedback is one of those this group of conspiracy theorists has attempted to sue. Is there some relevance to that remark and the fact that Patrick J. Michaels admitted that 40% of his funding comes from the oil industry....lol

Read my post again. Perhaps you'll see that very portion of the quote I included..................doh

Actually some Jan 6th protestors have received far larger sentences by other judges, are those judges biased to?

Not my narrative, I quoted what the judge said who is not the only judge to make similar remarks when sentencing rioters from Jan 6th and left out the opinion piece promoted by Trump and his followers which is indeed nonsense.

Isn't that the same sentiment raised by many judges? “I see the videotapes. I see the footage of the flags and the signs that people were carrying and the hats that they were wearing, and the garb,” Chutkan said. “And the people who mobbed that Capitol were there in fealty, in loyalty to one man, not to the Constitution, of which most of the people who come before me seem woefully ignorant; not to the ideals of this county and not to the principles of democracy. It’s blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day.” Chutkan’s sentiments have been common among judges who have sentenced Jan. 6 rioters. Several have expressed discomfort over punishing rioters — who had been deluged with lies about the election by Trump and steered to the Capitol with a warning that their country was being stolen and their livelihoods were in danger — while those who misled them have faced no consequences. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/14/trump-inflammatory-comments-judge-chutkan-00111041 The added opinion that "Chutkan appeared to lament the fact Trump was not yet in prison" is made up nonsense.

Of course you can source this claim with a link.........

Before accusing others of errors you need to check your own sources, they are a joke. https://www.ourenergypolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/regv36n3-6n.pdf The above which is authored by Patrick J. Michaels is nothing but a misrepresentation and misinterpretation of the models used in the IPCC reports and an old one from 2013 at that. "Many of the supposedly factual statements made in Michaels' testimony are either inaccurate or are seriously misleading" He's often on FOX news peddling false claims On Fox News, Patrick Michaels falsely claims humans are only responsible for half of global warming https://climatefeedback.org/claimreview/on-fox-news-patrick-michaels-falsely-claims-humans-are-only-responsible-for-half-of-global-warming/ Not surprising really since he's received donations from energy companies and advocated on their behalf numerous times in the past. In fact he's even admitted that 40% of his funding comes from the oil industry. "fossil fuel companies have helped fund Michaels' projects, including his World Climate Report"

No you didn't but made this claim and when asked for a link you have failed to do so There are recordings (and public appearances) of Biden committing crimes and confessing to crimes!   Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source. https://aseannow.com/forum/158-world-news/

You missed that polls are weighted to reflect the demographics of the population of interest and have a credibility interval or a poll’s margin of error. Each poll conducted will tell you where they got their volunteers from, how the data was collected and the exact questions asked. Obviously you fail to go to poll sources to get this info.

That's not a left winger, that's a psychopathic murderer Evidence on all counts, that I'm a lefty woke and that Biden became "suddenly rich" I'll wait left winger........................

Left winger.........lol Joe Biden tax returns since 1998 https://www.taxnotes.com/presidential-tax-returns

Way off topic, why not start your own thread

How do you know if its even the same pupil if they are wearing a Burka?

What made you assume that? LOL There you go again making assumptions and in addition claiming that they try to ban and regulate everything.

Anyone who can't see that has no credibility as a functioning human being. I can't see that no. The majority of all major countries including Europe prefer Biden. Quite an inflammatory remark there Bignok. Are you claiming all those people including me have no credibility as a functioning human being?

Most of the climate models were accurate. In addition: "Today, the models are much more sophisticated. Mainframe computers driven by paper punch cards have given way to supercomputers running trillions of calculations in 1 second. Modern models account for myriad interactions, including ice and snow, changes in forest coverage, and cloud formation—things that early modelers could only dream of doing. But Hausfather and his colleagues still wanted to see how accurate those bygone models really were."

"Indictments inspired by radical Da's" Indictments handed down by the jury who saw the evidence actually

It is rather satisfyingly I agree, particularly since trump is known for his racist attacks. How Trump’s attacks on prosecutors build on history of using racist language and stereotypes NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump’s aggressive response to his fourth criminal indictment in five months follows a strategy he has long used against legal and political opponents: relentless attacks, often infused with language that is either overtly racist or is coded in ways that appeal to racists. The early Republican presidential front-runner has used terms such as “animal” and “rabid” to describe Black district attorneys. He has accused Black prosecutors of being “racist.” He has made unsupported claims about their personal lives. And on his social media platform, Truth Social, Trump has deployed terms that rhyme with racial slurs as some of his supporters post racist screeds about the same targets. https://apnews.com/article/trump-race-georgia-indictment-new-york-prosecutors-04b69a8f3e4873eadb03c132cdee09c8?

Serves them right, a few days ago they mislead the judge in claiming they had to sift through 11.5 million pages of documents likening it to having to read 78 copies of War and Peace a day. In actual fact much of the documentation is duplicated and a lot already made public to them for months. The defense review also produced many documents twice: once to show the original source from which the government obtained the document, and again in a separate witness folder if the document was used in interviewing a witness. In actual fact the discovery in this case is somewhat like 78 copies of War and Peace, but not in the way the defense meant, after you read the first one, you don’t need to read the other 77. In yesterdays hearing the defense counsel were getting ever more heated refusing to budge even one day in their proposed hearing date of April 2026 until the judge had to tell them to calm down. "She gave the defense team several opportunities to come up with a more realistic proposed trial date. He refused to budge even one month or one day." Let justice commence.

Even 50-year-old climate models correctly predicted global warming Climate change doubters have a favorite target: climate models. They claim that computer simulations conducted decades ago didn't accurately predict current warming, so the public should be wary of the predictive power of newer models. Now, the most sweeping evaluation of these older models—some half a century old—shows most of them were indeed accurate. https://www.science.org/content/article/even-50-year-old-climate-models-correctly-predicted-global-warming

The hammer has been dropped. Trump's Jan 6th case trial date set for 4th March 2024. Prosecution wanted Jan 2024 but Trumps defense wanted April 2026. Trump’s Jan. 6 trial raises the stakes for the Florida presidential contest https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/28/trump-jan-6-trial-florida-presidential-contest-00113244

91 indictments were not handed down by journalists.