Bkk Brian

Far better than taking my post on Trumps dear love affair with Kim and returning with a hysterical rant

I thought my post was about Trump & Rocket Man but carry on with your hyperbole.

But you just said they were pretty inefficient, what makes you say that if you don't know?

Perhaps they believed Trump had handed them all over so no, they've learnt their lesson now, hence the court order and where we are today. Pity Trump did not give everything back when asked and ordered to don't you think?

Did I reject your link about a claimed 6 lies from Biden? Or did I just provide with a list of links and lies which disproves your unsubstantiated claim that was: "I believe that this "serial liar", as you brand him, was at least as fit to serve as any of his recent predecessors, who lied just as regularly, as does this latest one in the line right now."

Jan 2022: DOJ removes from MAL highly classified Top Secret docs But Trump keeps more. June 2022: DOJ returns and finds more highly classified Top Secret docs But Trump keeps more. Aug 2022: DOJ under court order removes more Top Secret docs

Please, Trumps buddy Kim Rocket Man Un...???? "Former United States President Donald Trump has told associates since leaving the White House he has remained in contact with North Korea’s reclusive leader Kim Jong Un amid raised tensions over recent his country’s missile tests, according to a report on Thursday. Trump famously declared in 2018 that he and Kim “fell in love” after exchanging letters, but three meetings with the North Korean leader failed to persuade him to give up his nuclear bombs and missiles." So what was it they talked about that was nothing to do with sugar?

To what do I need to read back to exactly, here is what you said: "I believe that this "serial liar", as you brand him, was at least as fit to serve as any of his recent predecessors, who lied just as regularly, as does this latest one in the line right now." Here is what I provided to refute your nonsensical claim: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/16/politics/fact-check-dale-top-15-donald-trump-lies/index.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/24/trumps-false-or-misleading-claims-total-30573-over-four-years/ Final tally of lies: Analysts say Trump told 30,000 mistruths – that’s 21 a day – during presidency https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/trump-lies-false-presidency-b1790285.html

From your link: "But by all accounts there was nothing in the safe and the FBI didn’t take anything from it." Who were all those accounts? Couldn't have been Eric Trump could it?

Better check the links I posted then eh..........

Even the Kangaroos are at it.....lol Roo-krainian protestor attacks the Russian embassy as the furious animal tries to push through the fortified gate Kangaroo filmed attacking the front gate of the Russian Embassy in Australia https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11104623/Kangaroo-tries-gate-Russian-Embassy-Canberra-Australia.html

You really need to open your eyes: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/01/16/politics/fact-check-dale-top-15-donald-trump-lies/index.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/01/24/trumps-false-or-misleading-claims-total-30573-over-four-years/ Final tally of lies: Analysts say Trump told 30,000 mistruths – that’s 21 a day – during presidency https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election-2020/trump-lies-false-presidency-b1790285.html

What you believe and what the truth actually is, are a world away. Can you provide some evidence that Biden or Trumps predecessor lied just as much?

Can we all screenshot entire articles and post them or is this a Trump supporters exclusive?

If I was you instead of hysterics mirroring the truth social tweets of Trump and his right wing conspiracy theory foot-soldiers why not be a little patient and wait for the results of the investigation and the release of the warrant details, something Trump failed to do.

Hardly surprising attacks on the FBI have started when Republicans like Paul Gosar, U.S. representative for Arizona's 4th congressional district tweet this rhetoric: https://twitter.com/RepGosar/status/1556821907726630915

Could be something to do with this? Flynn-backed plan to transfer nuclear tech to Saudis may have broken laws, say whistleblowers Investigators fear President Trump is still considering the plan, which was pushed by Flynn and Trump friend Tom Barrack. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna973021 Trump Admin Weirdly Eager to Hand the Saudis Nuclear Secrets Lawmakers want to prevent Saudi Arabia from getting a nuclear weapon. The administration isn’t worried! https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/03/trump-admin-eager-to-hand-the-saudis-nuclear-secrets Jared and the Saudi Crown Prince Go Nuclear? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/02/opinion/sunday/saudi-arabia-jared-kushner-nuclear.html

Yes thanks saw that, there's a new OP on it here: https://aseannow.com/topic/1268625-garland-said-he-moved-to-unseal-trump-search-warrant-defends-doj-from-attack/ Nuclear docs

It could be nuclear.........???? FBI searched Trump’s home looking for nuclear documents and other items, according to people familiar with the investigation, experts in classified information said the unusual search underscores deep concern among government officials about the types of information they thought could be located at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago Club and potentially in danger of falling into the wrong hands. People familiar with the investigation did not offer additional details about what type of information the agents were seeking, including whether it involved weapons belonging to the United States or some other nation. https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1557880239287455744 https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/08/11/garland-trump-mar-a-lago/

Yes she's extreme but she's no entertainer, she's also elected to Congress & the U.S. representative for Georgia's 14th congressional district. Just the right candidate to run with the conspiracy theory planted by Trump. She's also not alone in her wacky beliefs, two dozen Republicans across the country in their congressional districts have engaged with the QAnon.

Yes Trump could have made the details of the warrant public himself, now Garland is asking the court to release them publicly, Trump has until Friday to object. Donald Trump: Mar-a-Lago search warrant could be unsealed The US Department of Justice is asking a Florida court to unseal the warrant that let FBI agents search former President Donald Trump's home. If granted, the request would make the documents available to the public, the justice department has so far not revealed the reason for the search - but the unsealed warrant could. Mr Trump has until Friday to object to the unsealing - or could release details of the warrant himself. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62512360

Nice summary from the Drive with all the current available evidence on the Saki Air Base attack in Crimea. At least 9 jets destroyed probably many more. Widespread Destruction Seen After Blasts At Russian Base In Crimea Though it remains unclear exactly what caused the blasts at Saki Air Base yesterday, the clear focus of the damage on areas where combat aircraft were clustered, together with the craters that look to be major munition impact points, only further point to a deliberate aerial attack or strike of some kind. Regardless, it seems somewhat unlikely that the damage we're seeing was inflicted during some kind of special operations ground raid – the fact that it happened during the day makes that even less plausible. The craters, especially, are not what you would expect to see from explosive charges emplaced by teams on the ground. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/widespread-destruction-seen-after-blasts-at-russian-base-in-crimea

Possibly, another possibility being that they obtained the CCTV as confirmed in this article and then had to act based on that within a certain time period: If Trump took documents from the White House to Florida twenty months ago, would a judge want some reason to think that the documents are still there? Yes. One of the requirements for the search warrant is evidence that the information will be there during the two-week period that the F.B.I. is authorized to do a search—the information is not “stale.” And that’s the term of art that people talk about. Is the information being presented by the F.B.I. to the court stale? What you are looking for is some evidence of recency. https://www.newyorker.com/news/q-and-a/what-the-fbis-raid-of-mar-a-lago-could-mean-for-trump

Of course we also know that The Department of Justice obtained security CCTV footage from inside Mar-a-Lago, before requesting a search warrant.

You use a search warrant, and not a subpoena, when you don’t believe that the person is actually going to comply. Its now quite a few months since so yes I guess so