Bkk Brian

Media Matters has a higher factual rating than Fox News. Besides all the direct source links are included if you care to click on the links. So now that you try to kick the messenger and because you don't like the message, whats your response?

Its called free choice. If you want to worry about anti social behaviour I suggest there's a lot more out there than people wearing masks if they want to.

How have some of the right wing media attempted to justify Carlson's racists comments? Easy, add some more racism. Daily Wire’s Matt Walsh furthered the racist narrative, saying, “In nearly every video on the Internet where gangs of people viciously assault another person, the gangs are comprised of people who are not white.” TPUSA’s Charlie Kirk claimed, “Tucker Carlson did nothing wrong,” adding, “There is a disturbing pattern of Blacks jumping people of all races in the urban corridors in America. That is a fact.” Megyn Kelly “sounds like gang violence to me. … And if you look at stats on gangs in America … literally it’s 99% non-white. … If Tucker is responding to what looks like gang violence, it is not inaccurate to say it’s not typically a group of white people doing that.” https://www.mediamatters.org/tucker-carlson/right-wing-media-defend-tucker-carlsons-racist-text-messages-more-racism

This from Tucker last year, interactive view of some of his clips Carlson has repeatedly promoted parts of the “replacement” theory on his broadcast. In more than 400 episodes, according to an analysis recently published in The New York Times, Carlson backed the idea that elites want to substitute white voters with immigrants or people from the “Third World.” https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/04/30/us/tucker-carlson-tonight.html

"Not how white men fight" Pure racism. Unless I'm mistaken and he meant that they should have had AR-15's

80 million views, really? Wow, how many times did you view it? Considering 92% of his audience at Fox were white and older generation then it seems their missing their idol. How sincere is this for instance? “I’ve got four more years here. I’m stuck with Fox. Got to do whatever I can to keep our numbers up and our viewers happy.”

Hell on earth, no other way to describe this onslaught of sheer terror.

"As degrees become worth less" Where did you pull that one from..................?

Oh dear........................ “It’s true with stars that they can grab women by the pussy?” Kaplan asked. “Well, that’s what, if you look over the last million years, I guess that’s been largely true, not always, but largely true, unfortunately or fortunately,” he replied. When Kaplan asked Trump if he considered himself a star, Trump said, “I think you can say that, yeah.” The deposition also included an apparent gotcha moment in which Trump, who maintained that he didn’t rape Carroll because she wasn’t his type, mistook an old photo of Carroll for his ex-wife Marla Maples, who was presumably his type. https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-deposition-footage-shows-him-admit-stars-get-away-with-sexual-assault

You should check who has shares in Bud Light..............lol

Its not an opinion its a fact.

You said: "This is apparently what the majority of people in FL want." I corrected you, the majority of the people in Florida are against this law. State Legislators are elected to represent the constituents of their congressional district. They failed.

Read the statement of facts contained in the article links

From the statement of facts, some pics of the explosive device detonating along with a still of him throwing it.

Recent polling finds the six-week abortion ban is not popular among Florida residents of either political party. A University of North Florida poll in March found 75% of 1,452 respondents said they either somewhat or strongly opposed the six-week ban. That included 61% of Republicans. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/floridas-legislature-passes-6-week-abortion-ban-rcna78988

She had scans before 15 weeks that were fine. It was only after in subsequent scans that an abnormality was found, you need more than one ultra sound to make confirmations. its fully explained in the Washington Post article I just posted as it is in the CNN article if you followed all the links. But again you prefer to blame CNN rather than the law which caused this situation

This article on her back in Feb. The medical experts were unfortunately right. Diagnosis by the doctors was not made until she was 23 weeks pregnant. Too late with the 15 week ban. "Deborah left carrying the scan stamped with the fetus’s gestational age — 23 weeks Even though medical experts expect their baby to survive only 20 minutes to a couple of hours, the Dorberts say their doctors told them that because of the new legislation, they could not terminate the pregnancy." https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2023/02/18/florida-abortion-ban-unviable-pregnancy-potter-syndrome/

Thanks for the confirmation that you failed in that respect and insinuate that CNN spun it.

You didn't read it very well. Her own doctor in a youtube video explains all. Link in article

Yes you're missing a lot of info, you didn't read the article that would answer your questions including from her own doctor.

Something that could have been decided on if Trump had supplied a sample of his DNA when asked for in 2020, which he refused to do.

"Ms. Carroll first requested in early 2020 that Mr. Trump provide a sample of his DNA for comparison, Mr. Trump repeatedly refused. Nearly three years later, Mr. Tacopina told the court that his client was finally willing to provide a DNA sample, under certain conditions, specifically, Mr. Trump offered his DNA in exchange for an appendix to a laboratory report that Ms. Carroll commissioned about genetic material on the dress. Judge Kaplan called Mr. Trump’s offer a stalling tactic, noting in a pretrial ruling that his offer came after a deadline to disclose evidence had already passed, Judge Kaplan also said that the two sides had already agreed in a joint order that no DNA experts would be called as witnesses." https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/27/nyregion/dna-evidence-trump-carroll-trial.html

How many stories need to be exposed on Clarence before action is taken?? Clarence Thomas Helped Kill Eviction Bans That Threatened Harlan Crow’s Business Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas voted to end federal tenant protections that his billionaire benefactor’s company says threatened its real estate profit margins, according to corporate documents reviewed by the Lever. Thomas did not disclose his relationship with real estate billionaire Harlan Crow, nor did he recuse himself from the 2021 case, despite its potential impact on Crow Holdings. Now, rent control — which Crow Holdings’ documents also say threatens the company’s business — could come before Thomas, and there is no indication he would recuse himself if it does. https://jacobin.com/2023/04/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-gifts-eviction-ban

In addition to that, its also worth noting the often referred to false claims that there were no weapons: The FBI on Tuesday arrested a Florida man accused of setting off an “explosive device” in the US Capitol tunnel during the attack on January 6, 2021. "In one of the most violent scenes of the Capitol riot, a line of police officers protected an entrance to the building against violent rioters who used poles, bats, fists, stolen riot shields, chemical spray and, according to court documents, small explosives to attack the officers." https://edition.cnn.com/2023/05/03/politics/florida-man-charged-explosion-capitol-riot/index.html & here's another one of those peaceful rioters............................ "An ex-FBI official who allegedly urged rioters to "kill" officers during the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol was previously the supervisory special agent in charge of Homegrown Violent Extremism for the FBI New York Field Office's Joint Terrorism Task Force, a senior law enforcement official told NBC News" https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/ex-fbi-agent-feds-say-urged-jan-6-rioters-kill-police-worked-terrorism-rcna82775

He said Carroll was not his type....................lol During the October deposition, Mr Trump was shown a black-and-white photo of himself speaking to people at an event. He said: "It's Marla," referring to his second wife Marla Maples, before his lawyer corrected him saying: "No, that's Carroll." https://news.sky.com/story/its-marla-donald-trump-confuses-rape-accuser-with-ex-wife-trial-told-12873372