Bkk Brian

I am certainly asking you to justify all your claims with the relevant pieces of evidence. Factual claims need links as per forum rules

Again...........

Can you go ahead and list with links the many laws that were broken along with links to them regarding this particular case and why? How do they refute the immigration laws of 8 USC 1182 and 8 USC 1227 ?

No need to read your posts again, even you are admitting you know little about the case in the OP which you obviously have not read.

Laws can be wrong and vague; Yet they are still the law and the case has already been laid out in the topic before you posted

Read the OP and listen to the statements then, because I agree, you know nothing about the case that this is all about yet are posting as if you do and again nothing to do with first amendment, that's pure deflection.

Nothing to do with first amendment Its basic immigration law. 8 USC 1182 and 8 USC 1227 again showing just how little you know about this case

Yes you were very wrong Its all on video too. It can be challenged but there is more than enough evidence.

The law regarding this individual and again your showing your ignorance to the topic and the OP "5. ⁠Separately, though no crime of “material” support of terrorism (or any other crime) is legally necessary to deport an alien, his distribution of pamphlets with Hamas iconography and language is “material” support (yes, producing and distributing documents is considered material support — look it up — just like other forms of “material” support like direct financial assistance). "

Wrong, when you are actively supporting a designated terrorist group and actively spewing that speech in private buildings that you have taken over. You fail again

His case is being heard now in the courts, you are talking nonsense and arguing against established US immigration law and the numerous posts outlining the evidence and procedure already in this topic. Do you put this much effort into demanding the release of the US hostage still being held by Hamas in the terror tunnels, the same terrorists that Khalil supports?

Excellent news. "Two Chinese state oil companies have halted purchases of Russian oil, and two more have decreased the amount of oil purchased - they are assessing compliance with the US sanctions on Russia, Reuters reports. Since the US sanctions were introduced on January 10, imports from Russia sharply declined in China and India. A source in Beijing told Reuters that their company stopped buying oil from Russia until it gets a detailed compliance check. If the USA were to lift or ease sanctions against Russia in a possible ceasefire deal, then the company would probably resume purchases of Russian oil. Two Russian companies, Surgutneftegaz and Gazprom Neft, export about 1,2 metric tons of oil to China per month." https://x.com/Gerashchenko_en/status/1900526788196917636

Here’s why Mahmoud Khalil will be deported, without a doubt. 1. Legal permanent residents are still aliens subject to 8 USC 1182 and 8 USC 1227, and thus explicitly deportable for any speech expressing support for designated terrorist organizations or statutorily defined “terrorist activities,” as well as deportable for foreign policy grounds at the sole determination of the Secretary of State and/or AG. These are not crimes, but they don’t have to be. They are removal grounds under 8 USC 1182 and 8 USC 1227. No criminal conviction is required to remove aliens. IF a crime is committed, it can serve as grounds for removal, but no allegation of criminal misconduct is necessary. 2. ⁠No due process has been denied. He is entitled to a basic statement that he is being detained and subject to removal proceedings, and he got one, and he’s entitled to a removal hearing before being deported, and he’ll get one. 3. ⁠He is not missing. The ICE detention database, available to the public, clearly lists that he is in a detention facility in Louisiana. 4. ⁠These actions are not being done in the name of “Jewish safety.” They are being done on the basis of expressing support for terrorism organizations or activities and on foreign policy grounds which is the prerogative of the Secretary of State and/or AG. 5. ⁠Separately, though no crime of “material” support of terrorism (or any other crime) is legally necessary to deport an alien, his distribution of pamphlets with Hamas iconography and language is “material” support (yes, producing and distributing documents is considered material support — look it up — just like other forms of “material” support like direct financial assistance). 6. ⁠This is an open-and-shut case. At the removal hearing, the government will recite the above, and the judge will affirm that these recitations have been made. On the “foreign policy” grounds of 8 USC 1227 alone, Mahmoud Kahlil is deportable and the government’s declaration that his presence is contrary to foreign policy is non-reviewable. The judge is not entitled to second-guess this; the judge can only require that this invocation be made by the government, and indeed, this invocation will be made.

In the bill currently being read, what law that they are replacing will work and address the example given in the OP?

You're welcome NumbNut!

Its mainly left wing in the UK, does that make it spastic? https://www.allsides.com/news-source/sky-news-media-bias

He's doing away with one of the largest quangos which will hopefully be excellent news but unfortunately he's creating more. What's a 'quango' - and how many are there? The Labour government has set up more than 20 since winning power last July. These include Great British Energy, which will invest in renewable energy to help meet clean power goals, and Skills England, which supports people in finding jobs. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cx29lrl826rt?post=asset%3Adbb12fde-3492-498a-a601-2a48e25149d9#post

Welcome to the board, your first post and US Immigration law.....lol oh and he is getting a trial

None is consistent, non has at legal basis. You're a lawyer acting on his behalf now are you? There is plenty of material and video evidence including his direct interviews on tape. View some direct evidence for yourself below. "When you see people gnashing their teeth and rending their garments over the arrest and potential deportation of Mahmoud Khalil, one of the lead Hamas acolytes at Columbia University, show them this thread of his greatest hits" https://x.com/EFischberger/status/1898953421048193345

Rubbish you have no idea of the laws

No fact: Check US immigration Law 8 USC 1182 and 8 USC 1227

It begs it for you yes but in the real world there does not have to be charges laid, another deflection point from you. As for allegations and evidence, they are on video for all to see. Right wing press? Have you read the OP and the statements on video?

Where does it apply to this case? This is about American immigration law.

Civilians or Freedom fighters they were not, terrorists who murdered innocents civilians they were. It was an illegal organisation in the Republic of Ireland and designated a proscribed terrorist organisation in the United Kingdom and the United States. The Real IRA waged a campaign in Northern Ireland against the Police Service of Northern Ireland—formerly the Royal Ulster Constabulary—and the British Army.

So true. Left wing "ambulance-chasing, human-rights zealots"