Bkk Brian

the Livingstone brothers amassed (not created) much of their wealth from buy-to-let rents Can you provide a link to your claims, still also waiting for the welfare payments claims

What about all the other investments that were the first of their successes? " Ian, who originally studied optometry, also founded an eyewear business that expanded to more than 200 stores before he sold his stake to Leonardo Del Vecchio’s Luxottica Group in 2010." Can you expand on the welfare payments that you claimed? A link to that would be a good start. "It would be interesting to know what portion of the Livingstone’s income in rents is derived from welfare payments to their tenants."

Well how about you do some research then, here's a starter for you, distressed properties that just one of the brothers was into 30 years ago, not exactly the same as their property portfolio now which is one of the largest privately owned in Europe. https://lrp.co.uk/

Read the link. It was a quote from tax advisors

If a UK citizen becomes a non-resident of the UK they will still need to pay UK tax on income earned in the UK. Why are you telling me something that was not disputed by me?

Read my post again. Obviously any physical work they did for their companies while living in the UK will no longer apply as they will not be doing it anymore! No facts have evaded me, how about you? If you live or work outside the UK for much of the time, you may no longer have to pay as much UK tax. Learn everything you need to know about expat taxes below. https://www.unbiased.co.uk/discover/tax-business/self-assessment/expatriate-taxes Thats without even mentioning all the other benifits including capital gains etc

Why would I make a comment on articles that you are trying to link them to without a shred of evidence. I reply on facts not your speculation and false accusations. I mean, you already claim I idolize them...........

There you go again, first you accuse them of being people who should not be admired. Greed is not a pleasant trait. despite evidence to the contrary and then go onto accusing me of idolizing them.....lol Further more making unsubstantiated links to the intentions for their charitable donations. I suggest you read the OP and the related articles: London’s Wealth Exodus: Capital Falls from Top Five Richest Cities as Millionaires Depart UK Exodus of Millionaires Highlights Concerns Over Labour’s Tax Policies

Your not making sense, how do those who set up their own charitable trusts to give to UK children, education and disadvantaged children fit in perfectly with them being.....................

You didn't read the OP then, the increased levy in capital gains? They earn and work at those those assets and paid a huge amount of tax on them. How on earth does this need explaining to you?

Straight for attacking the messenger again from the WSJ

They were happy to before Labour came along and changed the rules. Now how does that fit in with your post below I responded to?

Did you miss their philanthropic foundations they have actively supported for UK children and education?

Correct, they've transformed themselves into "Youth Demand" and are busy already with their new fixation. https://archive.ph/fMtgp

Good question. The only ICC remaining arrest warrant for a Hamas member was for Mohammed Deif, but he was a confirmed kill by the IDF last year and Hamas finally got round to admitting it in Jan this year. The ICC then withdrew his arrest warrant in Feb this year. ICC cancels warrant for Hamas military leader Deif, weeks after group confirms death https://www.timesofisrael.com/icc-cancels-warrant-for-hamas-military-leader-deif-weeks-after-group-confirms-death/ There are no others

Stop trolling, and so what? A little more from the topic.

And?

Actually also confirmed by Chinese media, Russia admits North Korea help, thanks troops for reclaiming Kursk https://www.scmp.com/news/world/russia-central-asia/article/3308074/ukraine-war-russia-admits-north-korea-help-thanks-troops-reclaiming-kursk

Yes, but Hamas, its in the topic, try reading it sometime instead of making your normal one line baseless and worthless comments

Deflection from what you said and my response to it is obviously not your strong point no

There you go again. Rubbish, they are blatantly holding hostages as we speak and don't need a court to be told they are guilty. https://x.com/EylonALevy/status/1916333937715986676

Nah. Hamas are guilty. Nice try

But you deflect, my example clearly was, why not read it again

Don't think Meeriam says anything about Trump and selective wokeness

No idea my post was factual and to refute the false claims made. If you want to talk about suits and ties do it with someone else who actually cares