Bkk Brian

Extreme false equivalence but expected from you

In direct opposition to his own foreign minister, Iran's supreme leader has just made a statement saying that the damage was “nothing significant” so how does that fit in with your little theory?

Oh my, another one who hasn't read the OP and what it's about...😶

This is about Iran's wish to get nuclear weapons. If you want to talk about something else start a topic on it.

B.S. You are covering for terrorists to get their own weapons of mass destruction. Disgusting

Deflection to more Trump hate rather than facts. The claims below are false, fact

NYT followed CNN in its reporting of the misleading preliminary assessment did it not?

Here comes the Trump hate rather than facts about the report

What has that got to do with what he said?

Who made the false claims?

He was referring to the report that was leaked and taken out of context by CNN. That's the point and to try and defend that very fact would be lame at this point seeing all the evidence that has now come to light to p[rove it was very wrong.

Can you link where the goal was to wipe Iran's nuclear program for a decade or more.? Who said its only for a month or two?

His point: The skill and the courage it took to go into enemy territory, flying 36 hours on behalf of the American people... to take out a nuclear program is beyond what anyone in this audience can fathom. And then the instinct — the instinct of CNN... The New York Times is to try to find a way to spin it for their own political reasons What is it you do not agree with?

Short and to the point. Why did you not agree with his point?

What did he say that you did not agree with?

Did you even read the link posted earlier, what makes you think this particular facility was 300ft underground?

No, correction, what you alluded to was more misinformation as you usually do.

No statement on the veracity of the statements within the letter was made. Because as you just read in my reply but refusing to acknowledge, there are clear false and unsubstantiated claims made. 36 co signed this letter out of 300.

Suggest you read about the Israeli strike on the Natanz nuclear site and pay attention to what the IAEA says about it with regards to radiation inside and not outside. IAEA issued an update, saying that based on continued analysis of high- resolution satellite imagery collected after the attacks on the nuclear site at Natanz, the Agency has identified additional elements that indicate direct impacts also on the underground enrichment halls at Natanz. There has been no radiological impact outside the Natanz site, but circumscribed radiological and chemical contamination inside the enrichment facility, Director General Grossi reported. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-on-developments-in-iran

There's over 300 elected representatives. 36 co signed a letter that had unsubstantiated claims and 5 have been suspended you say.

Not true, radiation leaks can occur deep inside, just because its not been detected outside yet means nothing

That's a bit random and off topic, has nothing to do with the alleged lying in the video

Is that true?

I asked a question to the member who posted the link, I added some further information in the video to you that she lied.

She claims that "we now know that 880lbs of highly enriched Uranium was moved, you can tell that from the footage and pictures." Interesting that she has confirmed this and nobody else has but she reckons Trump is the liar. Its a possibility it was moved but its certainly not confirmed.